That applies to all visiting pacers in all venues. Not just in India but in Aus, SA and Eng as well. They are all bowilng to batsmen playing in home conditions and visiting pacers are not familiar to maximize their skills in these conditions.
And yet,
Lots of pacers visiting pacers have done very well in Aus, SA and Eng - Conclusion, Pitches are far more pacer friendly.
Not many visiting pacers have done well in India - Conclusion, It's a lot less friendly for pacers.
Indian team did not have ATG batting in home conditions in the last 10 years.
Indian pacers mostly used reverse better than visiting pacers. Indian pitches, with some exceptions, did not help pacers with new ball. In the last 10 years, no one will deny that Cummins, Rabada and Anderson were good test pacers after Bumrah. All 3 of them average north of 30 with zero 5-fers in India in the last 10 years. 20 tests combined. It's not my definition of pacers friendly pitches to be honest. Now if you flip it to SA, Eng or Aus then you will find lots of visiting pacers doing well and picking 5-fers.
If you are comparing it to dead pitches custom made by PCB during Aus tour then yah, not many pitches will be that dead for bowlers. Most pitches will feel lively compared to that kind of pitch. I was only comparing Indian pitches to Aus, SA, Eng pitches for pacers.
Indian pacers simply carried the tradition of great Pakistani pacers in using reverse well. But it's with old ball. New ball is not same as bowling in Aus, Eng or SA.
Might as well add entrance music. Bumrah coming on Hollywood Rock music. 
