Bhaijaan
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Runs
- 68,581
- Post of the Week
- 1
It is strange that while Sehwag remains one of the most polarising figures among online fans community, most cricketers current and retired as well as professional writers/analysts overwhelmingly regard him so highly.
Many online fans don’t take much time in putting Sehwag down by calling him an HTB/FTB. So down that as if he’s a nobody in world cricket.
But then come these professional cricketers and writers who seem to be in complete awe of Sehwag. It is astonishing how many ATG XIs he makes ahead of Hayden, Cook, Smith, Amla, Kirsten of his generation who are all respected more than him by online fans, apparently on basis of their more balanced record.
Why do the professionals not seem to care and put as many question marks on Sehwag as the online community does?
Is it favouritism/ignorance by professionals? Maybe they give too much attention to hype and word of mouth and not to statistics.
Or are online fans excessively paranoid about finding consistency and balance in statistics?
Many online fans don’t take much time in putting Sehwag down by calling him an HTB/FTB. So down that as if he’s a nobody in world cricket.
But then come these professional cricketers and writers who seem to be in complete awe of Sehwag. It is astonishing how many ATG XIs he makes ahead of Hayden, Cook, Smith, Amla, Kirsten of his generation who are all respected more than him by online fans, apparently on basis of their more balanced record.
Why do the professionals not seem to care and put as many question marks on Sehwag as the online community does?
Is it favouritism/ignorance by professionals? Maybe they give too much attention to hype and word of mouth and not to statistics.
Or are online fans excessively paranoid about finding consistency and balance in statistics?