What's new

Shoaib Malik Support & Performance Watch

Should Malik be in the plans for the 2019 WC?

  • Total voters
    421
  • Poll closed .
miandadrules said:
Sorry, wasn't meant to be exhaustive. There are many names that should come before malik.
.
Click to expand...

But but but but but but but but but but ....... he is averaging 99.94 in the wins this year in the ground's where pitch is laid from north to west instead of east to west.... and the stadiums have odd numbers of gates..... and the oppositions whose captain's last name contains letter "Z".
 
I see that the man I showed so much mercy towards by posting stats that favour his extravagant ideas through the selection criteria has been leading an attack towards the same stats without a single time commenting on them.

''Why did you select number 6-8?'' has been said from that forumer who posted ''Malik has been wasted at 7 and 8 by Misbah and Hafeez and yet done better than everyone else''. So, naturally curious, I thought, let's see how magnificent his performance at that position has been. And there, oh irony, Malik didn't even play a single match at the position. Now, here, a grudge-holding man would have come back and posted how ludicrous the argument is but, as a matter of fact, I don't hold any such ill-feelings and I included the 6th spot in my stats despite it being top order in most people's mind.

''How can you judge based on 7 matches'' is the argument posted by that same guy who has been basing his whole argumentary on ''average in won matches in last year'' when Pak merely won around 10 T20 matches, if not less, and even less ODI matches.

''Why runs rather than average?'' Yet averages are on the next column and only show that Umar Akmal or Afridi have benn better than Malik, let alone Fawad Alam.

''Why start the stats at 1 Jan 2010'' is another question from the apologist who's been notorious to say YK has tried to sabottage Malik's carrer. I therefore excluded the irrelevant stats that are from the year that hater was captain, 2009, and of course before which thus becomes an irrelevant period in the ''stats since'', which is incidentally also the start of a new decade, all the more relevant.

''You posted a link without any clarification'' said the man who has a habit of Screenshoting and/or put his stats on Excel (latex?) and thus making it impossible for other posters to verify their truth without going through hours of pain. And this trait has been exploited by him to post fallacious stats with false numbers, brilliantly exposed by W63L35.

So, here, I'll also ask a question: ''Would you rather have true stats that are easily verified and which you can change the criterias of, or a fallacious and intellectually dishonest Excel sheet/copy paste?''.
 
Last edited:
the Great Khan said:
I believe the word major pwnage was invented for a post like above!

but you forgot his 250 at the oval.
Click to expand...

IMHO that is the greatest knock by a Pakistani overseas ever. I often watch on youtube when I need a break at work.

My only regret of that tour was that Malik missed out on a century at Lords. It hurts me that a hack like Yousaf has his name on the honours board and the second coming of Hanif Mohammad doesn't.

Where is the justice?

And unlike so many Pakistani cricketers Shoaib Malik has never thrown a game....oh wait....
 
Black Zero said:
I responded to your post, where you mentioned the avg...

:facepalm: @ dumbness
Click to expand...

I apologise, I'm nowhere near as intelligent or as erudite as you.

It's obvious now that I highlighted the averages of Malik and Younis against South Africa in your post.
 
endymion248 said:
I see that the man I showed so much mercy towards by posting stats that favour his extravagant ideas through the selection criteria has been leading an attack towards the same stats without a single time commenting on them.

''Why did you select number 6-8?'' has been said from that forumer who posted ''Malik has been wasted at 7 and 8 by Misbah and Hafeez and yet done better than everyone else''. So, naturally curious, I thought, let's see how magnificent his performance at that position has been. And there, oh irony, Malik didn't even play a single match at the position. Now, here, a grudge-holding man would have come back and posted how ludicrous the argument is but, as a matter of fact, I don't hold any such ill-feelings and I included the 6th spot in my stats despite it being top order in most people's mind.

''How can you judge based on 7 matches'' is the argument posted by that same guy who has been basing his whole argumentary on ''average in won matches in last year'' when Pak merely won around 10 T20 matches, if not less, and even less ODI matches.

''Why runs rather than average?'' Yet averages are on the next column and only show that Umar Akmal or Afridi have benn better than Malik, let alone Fawad Alam.

''Why start the stats at 1 Jan 2010'' is another question from the apologist who's been notorious to say YK has tried to sabottage Malik's carrer. I therefore excluded the irrelevant stats that are from the year that hater was captain, 2009, and of course before which thus becomes an irrelevant period in the ''stats since'', which is incidentally also the start of a new decade, all the more relevant.

''You posted a link without any clarification'' said the man who has a habit of Screenshoting and/or put his stats on Excel (latex?) and thus making it impossible for other posters to verify their truth without going through hours of pain. And this trait has been exploited by him to post fallacious stats with false numbers, brilliantly exposed by W63L35.

So, here, I'll also ask a question: ''Would you rather have true stats that are easily verified and which you can change the criterias of, or a fallacious and intellectually dishonest Excel sheet/copy paste?''.
Click to expand...

:))) Another one ..... in a looooooooooooooong list of ... post 9011!

Brilliant post! :14: Post of the YEAR!
 
W63L35 said:
But but but but but but but but but but ....... he is averaging 99.94 in the wins this year in the ground's where pitch is laid from north to west instead of east to west.... and the stadiums have odd numbers of gates..... and the oppositions whose captain's last name contains letter "Z".
Click to expand...

I think you might be on to something here
 
The Shoaib Malik 'Support' Thread

endymion248 said:
I see that the man I showed so much mercy towards by posting stats that favour his extravagant ideas through the selection criteria has been leading an attack towards the same stats without a single time commenting on them.

''Why did you select number 6-8?'' has been said from that forumer who posted ''Malik has been wasted at 7 and 8 by Misbah and Hafeez and yet done better than everyone else''. So, naturally curious, I thought, let's see how magnificent his performance at that position has been. And there, oh irony, Malik didn't even play a single match at the position. Now, here, a grudge-holding man would have come back and posted how ludicrous the argument is but, as a matter of fact, I don't hold any such ill-feelings and I included the 6th spot in my stats despite it being top order in most people's mind.

''How can you judge based on 7 matches'' is the argument posted by that same guy who has been basing his whole argumentary on ''average in won matches in last year'' when Pak merely won around 10 T20 matches, if not less, and even less ODI matches.

''Why runs rather than average?'' Yet averages are on the next column and only show that Umar Akmal or Afridi have benn better than Malik, let alone Fawad Alam.

''Why start the stats at 1 Jan 2010'' is another question from the apologist who's been notorious to say YK has tried to sabottage Malik's carrer. I therefore excluded the irrelevant stats that are from the year that hater was captain, 2009, and of course before which thus becomes an irrelevant period in the ''stats since'', which is incidentally also the start of a new decade, all the more relevant.

''You posted a link without any clarification'' said the man who has a habit of Screenshoting and/or put his stats on Excel (latex?) and thus making it impossible for other posters to verify their truth without going through hours of pain. And this trait has been exploited by him to post fallacious stats with false numbers, brilliantly exposed by W63L35.

So, here, I'll also ask a question: ''Would you rather have true stats that are easily verified and which you can change the criterias of, or a fallacious and intellectually dishonest Excel sheet/copy paste?''.
Click to expand...

Word phainta was invented by the great Khan for this post.
 
The Shoaib Malik 'Support' Thread

BZ can give me prediction for Malik's performance in ODI series in the game he bat at 5/6?
 
saeed-sohail said:
Them pitches were flat. Malik's ODI performances on that tour prove how flat wickets in Eng were in 2006.
Click to expand...

It's obvious Yousaf and Younis have conspired with Youtube to have Malik's centuries removed.

How much victimisation can this great player take?

It really is true we never appreciate our greats.
 
The Shoaib Malik 'Support' Thread

miandadrules said:
It's obvious Yousaf and Younis have conspired with Youtube to have Malik's centuries removed.

How much victimisation can this great player take?

It really is true we never appreciate our greats.
Click to expand...

But no one can take his awesome ODIs record away from him. According to BZ pitches were flat on that tour but still kudos to the great man.

Younis Khan (Pak)55121510153.7529672.63111281

Mohammad Yousuf (Pak)5411496049.6628153.0201091

Shoaib Malik (Pak)44016104.003743.2400100
 
W63 you are obsessed lol. I clicked on search this thread, advanced search..typed in your username.. and it shows all your posts in this thread.

"Showing results 1 to 25 of 500" (posts)
"Page 1 of 20"

This is a single thread ( and your not even a supporter :/ ). I dare to think what your total post count (where you mention malik) would be in the whole forum. Atleast this is a thread about shoaib malik, please keep your malik posts saved for this thread and this thread only, unless there is a thread specifically discussing him.
 
endymion248 said:
I see that the man I showed so much mercy towards by posting stats that favour his extravagant ideas through the selection criteria has been leading an attack towards the same stats without a single time commenting on them.

''Why did you select number 6-8?'' has been said from that forumer who posted ''Malik has been wasted at 7 and 8 by Misbah and Hafeez and yet done better than everyone else''. So, naturally curious, I thought, let's see how magnificent his performance at that position has been. And there, oh irony, Malik didn't even play a single match at the position. Now, here, a grudge-holding man would have come back and posted how ludicrous the argument is but, as a matter of fact, I don't hold any such ill-feelings and I included the 6th spot in my stats despite it being top order in most people's mind.

''How can you judge based on 7 matches'' is the argument posted by that same guy who has been basing his whole argumentary on ''average in won matches in last year'' when Pak merely won around 10 T20 matches, if not less, and even less ODI matches.

''Why runs rather than average?'' Yet averages are on the next column and only show that Umar Akmal or Afridi have benn better than Malik, let alone Fawad Alam.

''Why start the stats at 1 Jan 2010'' is another question from the apologist who's been notorious to say YK has tried to sabottage Malik's carrer. I therefore excluded the irrelevant stats that are from the year that hater was captain, 2009, and of course before which thus becomes an irrelevant period in the ''stats since'', whichis incidentally also the start of a new decade, all the more relevant

''You posted a link without any clarification'' said the man who has a habit of Screenshoting and/or put his stats on Excel (latex?) and thus making it impossible for other posters to verify their truth without going through hours of pain. And this trait has been exploited by him to post fallacious stats with false numbers, brilliantly exposed by W63L35.

So, here, I'll also ask a question: ''Would you rather have true stats that are easily verified and which you can change the criterias of, or a fallacious and intellectually dishonest Excel sheet/copy paste?''.
Click to expand...


too long yet no substance...


I will breakdown...


A- basically in your posted link, there was no higher and/or deeper meaning (I should not have given you the benefit of doubt)

B- You picked the date 01 Jan 2010 for two reasons:
i) YK tried to sabotage so you excluded 2009 (first of all no one ever blamed YK about it, even YK said this during his hearing parliament) anyway, whta's wrong with starting from Jan 01 2012? you failed to address this.


ii)as it was a start of decade as you felt that this makes it all the more relevant (Who cares about start of decade? are you Mayan? even if you are should not you start from Dec 23rd 2012? even better why not start with Malik's birthday? it will make even more relevant...right? Why not from 00 hrs 15th aug 2012...both countries got independence... to make it relevant to all the people in Pakistan and India?
you failed to make the case for date.


C-
''Why runs rather than average?'' Yet averages are on the next column
Click to expand...

Question: Why runs rather than average?

and this is your answer: Yet averages are on the next column

FYI, this is not an answer, You failed again.


D- Malik did not play at #8 but he played total of 7 completed innings at #6 and #7

since jan 1 2012, Yk avg 20 while Afridi 15...

where is the point?

E- Sample set of 8 matches in 38 months is larger (or equal) than a sample set of 11 matches in 14 months

No, it's not and you are Wrong.

In last 14 months in T20 win matches Malik avg 52 (Nasir: 32, hafeez: 29 , Umer: 20 and afridi 19)
In last 14 months, in ODIs, malik avg 58 (nasir 77, Umer 54, Misbah 43, hafeez 35 and Afridi 17)

sample set: 11 won matches

I do not know why you mentioned another poster in this ...
I have addressed and answered all the questions asked and provided proof and requested link...it's up to him to accept the evidence provided and ask for forgiveness ...
 
This thread is still active, and some old members still post in this thread barring Black Zero [a supporter - relevant to this thread].

This thread will be busy. I have checked other threads where the name of Malik has been mentioned repeatedly. I fear PakPassion will be busy [tribute to Malik] as soon as T20 and ODI series begins, Insha'Allaah!

Assalamu Alaikum!
 
shokz1408 said:
W63 you are obsessed lol. I clicked on search this thread, advanced search..typed in your username.. and it shows all your posts in this thread.

"Showing results 1 to 25 of 500" (posts)
"Page 1 of 20"

This is a single thread ( and your not even a supporter :/ ). I dare to think what your total post count (where you mention malik) would be in the whole forum. Atleast this is a thread about shoaib malik, please keep your malik posts saved for this thread and this thread only, unless there is a thread specifically discussing him.
Click to expand...

You are not first one to notice this. Unfortunately, we will never know the reason of obsession. :asif
 
Black Zero said:
too long yet no substance...
Click to expand...

Learning from the very best in business as we speak.


I will breakdown...
Click to expand...

No need for that, I will breakdown myself before having a senior, who spents half his life on this thread, bowing down to me.

A- basically in your posted link, there was no higher and/or deeper meaning (I should not have given you the benefit of doubt)
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, I'm not one to manipulate stats and I believe in that the more filtres applied to a search, the more it's irrelevant and only trying to prove an imaginary point. So, no, it's not deep or exquisite, it just had a basic meaning which is ''Blaming Malik's Performance on him batting at 7 or 8 is off the mark''.

B- You picked the date 01 Jan 2010 for two reasons:
i) YK tried to sabotage so you excluded 2009 (first of all no one ever blamed YK about it, even YK said this during his hearing parliament) anyway, whta's wrong with starting from Jan 01 2012? you failed to address this.
Click to expand...

I don't believe that YK sabottaged Malik, I only believe that Malik apologists will go to any length to do so. So, I prevented it by excluding it.

As for not picking 2012, confer infra.

ii)as it was a start of decade as you felt that this makes it all the more relevant (Who cares about start of decade? are you Mayan? even if you are should not you start from Dec 23rd 2012? even better why not start with Malik's birthday? it will make even more relevant...right? Why not from 00 hrs 15th aug 2012...both countries got independence... to make it relevant to all the people in Pakistan and India?
you failed to make the case for date.
Click to expand...

''These are Malik's winning ODI stats since 1 January 2012''

I'm a Mayan calendar fan and, if it were on me, I'd have certainly picked a square date in that calendar. But, I wanted to please you and, as you seem to be a gregorian calendar adept, I thought let's pick 1 Jan 2010 for BZ's sake. Little did I know that you were actually lunatic, so I should have picked the moon calendar.

I'm not one to explain my jokes but you seem to be highly cartesian. Which brings me to my next point.

D- Malik did not play at #8 but he played total of 7 completed innings at #6 and #7

since jan 1 2012, Yk avg 20 while Afridi 15...

where is the point?
Click to expand...

Being nice doesn't pay off in this world...

So, let me return you the favour: Malik played a total of 0 completed innings at #6 and #7. I'd have thought that someone claiming to have an IQ of 142 and being agressive to Lethal Sami for some random math crap would know the logical difference between and vs or.

I guess that's what so nice about Internet. You can claim to be anyone and use some fancy words to do so. But logic is a vicious creature and it comes back to bite your lacks when you least expect it.

E- Sample set of 8 matches in 38 months is larger (or equal) than a sample set of 11 matches in 14 months
Click to expand...

So, isn't that self-explanatory as to why I picked 2010 rather than 2012 for having a bigger sample of matches, equal to the one you've been using lately albeit on a longer period of time. Some will argue that the said period is irrelevant because, all in all, the fact that I found only 7 matches since 2010 where Malik played at 6 7 8 clearly proves that he hasn't been hidden in the lower order as you claim him to be.

Even in the short sample where he has, he was outperformed by 4 players going by average (that's why I sorted by runs not to have a tailender at the top and thus risk the health of our dear BZ on the name of statistical relevance).


I do not know why you mentioned another poster in this ...
I have addressed and answered all the questions asked and provided proof and requested link...it's up to him to accept the evidence provided and ask for forgiveness ...
Click to expand...

I don't care as to who the poster is as long as it proves that your presentation of stats is a mean of manipulation rather than aesthetics, and I'm much better off without both.
 
Last edited:
MalikMohsin said:
You are not first one to notice this. Unfortunately, we will never know the reason of obsession. :asif
Click to expand...

Which would mean that you pointed out more than once at his Malik obsession. At least he is obsessed by an international star, can we know the reason of you and shoks (who even ran a search on his posts) stalking a random Internet poster you don't know and whose influence to your life is close to nil. As a matter of fact, you'd not even recognize him if he walked past you in the street yet you're giving so much importance to whom he posts about and whom he doesn't.
 
endymion248 said:
Learning from the very best in business as we speak.




No need for that, I will breakdown myself before having a senior, who spents half his life on this thread, bowing down to me.



I'm sorry, I'm not one to manipulate stats and I believe in that the more filtres applied to a search, the more it's irrelevant and only trying to prove an imaginary point. So, no, it's not deep or exquisite, it just had a basic meaning which is ''Blaming Malik's Performance on him batting at 7 or 8 is off the mark''.



I don't believe that YK sabottaged Malik, I only believe that Malik apologists will go to any length to do so. So, I prevented it by excluding it.

As for not picking 2012, confer infra.



''These are Malik's winning ODI stats since 1 January 2012''

I'm a Mayan calendar fan and, if it were on me, I'd have certainly picked a square date in that calendar. But, I wanted to please you and, as you seem to be a gregorian calendar adept, I thought let's pick 1 Jan 2010 for BZ's sake. Little did I know that you were actually lunatic, so I should have picked the moon calendar.

I'm not one to explain my jokes but you seem to be highly cartesian. Which brings me to my next point.



Being nice doesn't pay off in this world...

So, let me return you the favour: Malik played a total of 0 completed innings at #6 and #7. I'd have thought that someone claiming to have an IQ of 142 and being agressive to Lethal Sami for some random math crap would know the logical difference between and vs or.

I guess that's what so nice about Internet. You can claim to be anyone and use some fancy words to do so. But logic is a vicious creature and it comes back to bite your lacks when you least expect it.



So, isn't that self-explanatory as to why I picked 2010 rather than 2012 for having a bigger sample of matches, equal to the one you've been using lately albeit on a longer period of time. Some will argue that the said period is irrelevant because, all in all, the fact that I found only 7 matches since 2010 where Malik played at 6 7 8 clearly proves that he hasn't been hidden in the lower order as you claim him to be.

Even in the short sample where he has, he was outperformed by 4 players going by average (that's why I sorted by runs not to have a tailender at the top and thus risk the health of our dear BZ on the name of statistical relevance).




I don't care as to who the poster is as long as it proves that your presentation of stats is a mean of manipulation rather than aesthetics, and I'm much better off without both.
Click to expand...

you missed the "C"
 
endymion248 said:
Which would mean that you pointed out more than once at his Malik obsession. At least he is obsessed by an international star, can we know the reason of you and shoks (who even ran a search on his posts) stalking a random Internet poster you don't know and whose influence to your life is close to nil. As a matter of fact, you'd not even recognize him if he walked past you in the street yet you're giving so much importance to whom he posts about and whom he doesn't.
Click to expand...

That's it? You can add more if you want. What stop you? You have assumed a lot from mine a few posts today. Anyways, welcome to PakPassion.

Don't worry. I am not offended. PakPassion knows the truth about me, but if you like to add more information about me, feel free to do so. :asif
 
Black Zero said:
you missed the "C"
Click to expand...

If you'd actually read it instead of counting which one of your quotes are in there, you'd know that the answer is in the penultimate paragraph.

I don't blame you, usually people lacking logic also are pretty lazy readers. That makes them Logicless people and Lazy readers. See, that's how you use it, thank me later.
 
Last edited:
endymion248 said:
Which would mean that you pointed out more than once at his Malik obsession. At least he is obsessed by an international star, can we know the reason of you and shoks (who even ran a search on his posts) stalking a random Internet poster you don't know and whose influence to your life is close to nil. As a matter of fact, you'd not even recognize him if he walked past you in the street yet you're giving so much importance to whom he posts about and whom he doesn't.
Click to expand...

Stalking? Dude nearly every thread you go in there's W63's malik posts staring right at you. He likes his statistics, so I just provided him with one (@post count in this thread). This is a support thread, not a bashing one. Maybe W63 could make a "The shoaib malik 'bashing' thread'' and post all his malik related comments there.
 
MalikMohsin said:
That's it? You can add more if you want. What stop you? You have assumed a lot from mine a few posts today. Anyways, welcome to PakPassion.

Don't worry. I am not offended. PakPassion knows the truth about me, but if you like to add more information about me, feel free to do so. :asif
Click to expand...

Thanks for welcoming me.

Also... No, that's it, there's not much to make from the rest of the message. :P
 
shokz1408 said:
Stalking? Dude nearly every thread you go in there's W63's malik posts staring right at you. He likes his statistics, so I just provided him with one (@post count in this thread). This is a support thread, not a bashing one. Maybe W63 could make a "The shoaib malik 'bashing' thread'' and post all his malik related comments there.
Click to expand...

I'm not W63L35's pet so I don't care about what you say about him but if you don't want to read them, you don't. If you're obsessed by the poster, you can read them and post your condemnation under. But analyzing someone's post count, I'm sorry but that's stalking for someone pretending he doesn't care...
 
endymion248 said:
I'm not W63L35's pet so I don't care about what you say about him but if you don't want to read them, you don't. If you're obsessed by the poster, you can read them and post your condemnation under. But analyzing someone's post count, I'm sorry but that's stalking for someone pretending he doesn't care...
Click to expand...

Let W63 write for himself. You are behaving like his 'pet'. For all I know you could be W63 in disguise. I was just trying to help 'W63' out. Telling him to promote what he likes rather than bashing what he hates. When your character is defined by what you don't do/what you don't like, then something is clearly wrong. I do not wish to continue this discussion with you further.
 
shokz1408 said:
Let W63 write for himself. You are behaving like his 'pet'. For all I know you could be W63 in disguise. I was just trying to help 'W63' out. Telling him to promote what he likes rather than bashing what he hates. When your character is defined by what you don't do/what you don't like, then something is clearly wrong. I do not wish to continue this discussion with you further.
Click to expand...

For All I know, you could be Shoaib Malik since you criticized those who are criticizing him, or at least his pet. See, it works both ways...
 
Last edited:
It has come to the point that whenever I see W63's post I already know Malik's name must be mentioned. lol

Funny thing is that since Afridi is his favourite cricketer, he doesnt even spend half his time on PP defending him seeing as he gets ridiculed on almost a daily basis.

In addition, guys like SS and TGK who support W63 here are amongst those who think that Afridi is a joke :afridi

This guy is a lost case
 
Last edited:
endymion248 said:
Thanks for welcoming me.

Also... No, that's it, there's not much to make from the rest of the message. :P
Click to expand...

Really? Are you sure? Surely, you could assume a lot from a few posts of mine instead of reading my four thousand posts to get to know me better?

I am suspicious about you now. You have joined recently, and already posting like experienced member of PakPassion. Anyways, once again, welcome to PakPassion, #W63L65 :jf
 
MalikMohsin said:
Really? Are you sure? Surely, you could assume a lot from a few posts of mine instead of reading my four thousand posts to get to know me better?

I am suspicious about you now. You have joined recently, and already posting like experienced member of PakPassion. Anyways, once again, welcome to PakPassion, #W63L65 :jf
Click to expand...

Because I read many of your posts before having an account. It's the franc-macon way of doing things :P

And I must say, you're a brilliant poster. Love your posts in Time Pass section. If you'd ask me, you're wasting your precious knowledge on these shores talking about a game where some Indian damaad is hitting (or not) a red ball with a wooden bat.

If I were W63L35, I'd be able to use and understand smileys in a proper way, which is clearly not the case in my previous posts. Unless of course I did it one purpose not to be accused of being W63L35. But then I should have used them in a proper way, yet a bit nooby, for people not to assume that I am W63L35 acting as a noob for people not to see he's doing self-promotion. *Inception*
 
Last edited:
Riff said:
It has come to the point that whenever I see W63's post I already know Malik's name must be mentioned. lol

Funny thing is that since Afridi is his favourite cricketer, he doesnt even spend half his time on PP defending him seeing as he gets ridiculed on almost a daily basis.

In addition, guys like SS and TGK who support W63 here are amongst those who think that Afridi is a joke :afridi

This guy defines pathetic
Click to expand...

All I knew about W63 was he hates malik. I didnt even know he likes afridi lol, since every post you come across has the words malik plastered over it. Indeed, maybe W63 could redirect his energy in defending what he supports (afridi), rather than bashing what he does not (malik).
 
Assalamu Alaikum,

Insha'Allaah! Pakistan will win the match and T20 series.

I won't be able to watch the match because i will be attending Jumuah prayer which will in the same time the match will begin. Jumuah prayer is more important, and that way i can pray for the victory of Pakistan, Insha'Allaah!
 
MalikMohsin said:
Assalamu Alaikum,

Insha'Allaah! Pakistan will win the match and T20 series.

I won't be able to watch the match because i will be attending Jumuah prayer which will in the same time the match will begin. Jumuah prayer is more important, and that way i can pray for the victory of Pakistan, Insha'Allaah!
Click to expand...

Inshallah. Pakistan Zindabad :pkflag
 
shokz1408 said:
probably a defense mechanism, Putting all the spotlight on malik, to take away the attention from afridi and the rest of the player's failures.
Click to expand...

Not sure about other players but definitely to take away the attention away from Afridi.

You have seen nothing yet. Just wait when the match starts and when Malik comes out to bat, you would see more posts in this thread by W63 than in the official match thread :waqar
 
Last edited:
Riff said:
Not sure about other players but definitely to take away from the attention away from Afridi.

You have seen nothing yet. Just wait when the match starts and when Malik comes out to bat, you would see more posts in this thread by W63 than in the official match thread :waqar
Click to expand...

I don't doubt that one bit lol :razzaq. Irrespective of whether other batsmen fail to perform, you can virtually guarantee that W63 will visit this thread when malik is batting/gets out.
 
Riff said:
I heard about fans of cricketers, but when did we start having fans of posters?

The way this guy has come to the defence of W63 shows that he is either is a defender of W63 or W63 in disguise.

I dont want nobodies replying to posts. Never seen you before on PP
Click to expand...

Your keen eye surely noticed that there is no mention of your nemesis in previous post. Or not, hence the defense accusation.

If I'm not mistaken, this ''Malik support thread'' and ''Malik ''support ''thread'', yet there has been a massive diversion in the last page.

You can go to another thread and insult W63L35, meri walun, but please do not this derail this thread because ad hominem is your only contribution to it right now.

As for being a nobody, I thought you'd be envious of this position giving your pedigree and previous posts. Then again, someone burnt the Artemis Temple to become famous, what is posting crap next to it?
 
Guys, Stick to the topic. Its" Malik support thread ", any more off topic might land you in trouble. Last warning for everyone.
 
@^ he likes to play that cut shot...

not so good looking shot...but earned him so many runs...

(ppers think that he's afraid of ball :) )
 
Last edited:
Not really. Four overs is left. Hit or miss. No need to stabilize. The job of stabilizing the inning is done.
 
Well played...Mali.... for a brilliant 50!!! :14:
My MotM!!!
 
Last edited:
all maliks shots look like he is almost falling down... should not be in the team at all
 
zeikz123 said:
he plays some of the worst looking shots i have ever seen
Click to expand...
This comment was made 4 years ago ... and still hold!

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showpost.php?p=1662876&postcount=3



Sultan Yusuf said:
Shoaib Malik has a brilliant batting technique for a tailender.

He also now has an :younis AXCILLANT new apartment in the UAE (dubai) and is on to his second indian girlfriend. You could say he is an international man of mystery. Surely staying in Pakistan will not have the same appeal for him and hopefully he will realise just how much the rest of the world needs him. Let's all hope he realises his destiny and moves abroad!

:aiqbal
Click to expand...
 
This is hit or miss situation now. I want player to play risky shot. Better to play risky shot which could either buy run or get out than tuk tuk to the death. Then again, it's impossible to have debate with tuk-tuk fans. This is T20. Grow up.
 
saeed-sohail said:
We were set for 210+ until Hafeez was there. Now we will get around 190. If we lose would you say Malik played a key role in it?
Click to expand...

we were targeting 240 when hafeez run shehzad out...
however, if we lose, then i will blame YOU...

logical?
 
The Shoaib Malik 'Support' Thread

MalikMohsin said:
This is hit or miss situation now. I want player to play risky shot. Better to play risky shot which could either buy run or get out than tuk tuk to the death. Then again, it's impossible to have debate with tuk-tuk fans. This is T20. Grow up.
Click to expand...

Malik cut the philosophy. It's a belter and players before Malik and Kami were getting 10/12 with no risk. Malik and Kami screwed up, end of.
 
I would prefer Abdul Razzaq in the T20 line-up.

The only role I can see Malik being effective in, would be rebuilding after a collapse. But I think Razzaq and Kami could do that too and Razzaq offers more with the ball.
 
saeed-sohail said:
Malik cut the philosophy. It's a belter and players before Malik and Kami were getting 10/12 with no risk. Malik and Kami screwed up, end of.
Click to expand...

It is easy to score the runs from the first overs. Because at the beginning, you take time to get and settle and score comfortably without taking risk. Plus, all the fielders are inside. At the end, you gotta hit. When it comes to hitting zone, you could miss and get out now. That's called risk. And fielders are at boundaries. It's acceptable. It could have been another four too.

You can't understand T20 because you are fan of Younus Khan. This is not Test format. This is T20. It's better if you understand the rules of T20.

It will be fair to judge him in ODI where he won't be forced to hit in the death considering it is 50 overs. Today is 20 overs game, and Malik came in 16th with four overs remaining, it would be foolish to stabilize when the inning is already stabilized. Better to attack, you could miss and get out too. I like the idea of taking risks whether to buy runs or get out than tuk tuk to death.

Both Kamran and Shoaib Malik were supposed to hit, and they got out due to hitting. I don't blame them at all. Openers did the job, and that's all it matter.

They will be required if the openers fail, and that was the case in the last T20 series and Malik has stepped up when mattered the most. He showed that he can be dependable in under pressure. Then again, having this debate with you, you know nothing about T20 at all.

Your hatred for Malik has blinded you completely, and to the extent, you used to justify Misbah tuk tuk to death in T20. But this is not case here. Both Kamran and Malik played according to situation and got out due to hitting [they were required to -- not their fault).

Insha'Allaah! Pakistan can win today match unlike the Test series where batsmen have failed despite of not required to hit.
 
saeed-sohail said:
You have been watching too many Indian punjabi films.
Click to expand...

:))
No... It is not Punjabi.... it is supposed to be American... "dah".... fo the tupe of comments we get here from some of the Kanay...dhians! :P
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dah


Here is a comment from Cricinfo:

At the beginning of the match....
Sameer: "In USA cenral its 6:20 here now. i just got up to watch the game. But i had a dream before i got up. Pak won the toss and elected to bat . and they scored 177. malik and afridi having good batting performance. hopefully it goes that way!!" You have been proven 30% right till now, we'll check the power of your dream in 2 hours from now.
Click to expand...

At the end of the Pak innings....
akhter: "what happened to somebody's dream, Malik made a mess of it"
Click to expand...
 
MalikMohsin said:
It is easy to score the runs from the first overs. Because at the beginning, you take time to get and settle and score comfortably without taking risk. Plus, all the fielders are inside. At the end, you gotta hit. When it comes to hitting zone, you could miss and get out now. That's called risk. And fielders are at boundaries. It's acceptable. It could have been another four too.

You can't understand T20 because you are fan of Younus Khan. This is not Test format. This is T20. It's better if you understand the rules of T20.

It will be fair to judge him in ODI where he won't be forced to hit in the death considering it is 50 overs. Today is 20 overs game, and Malik came in 16th with four overs remaining, it would be foolish to stabilize when the inning is already stabilized. Better to attack, you could miss and get out too. I like the idea of taking risks whether to buy runs or get out than tuk tuk to death.

Both Kamran and Shoaib Malik were supposed to hit, and they got out due to hitting. I don't blame them at all. Openers did the job, and that's all it matter.

They will be required if the openers fail, and that was the case in the last T20 series and Malik has stepped up when mattered the most. He showed that he can be dependable in under pressure. Then again, having this debate with you, you know nothing about T20 at all.

Your hatred for Malik has blinded you completely, and to the extent, you used to justify Misbah tuk tuk to death in T20. But this is not case here. Both Kamran and Malik played according to situation and got out due to hitting [they were required to -- not their fault).

Insha'Allaah! Pakistan can win today match unlike the Test series where batsmen have failed despite of not required to hit.
Click to expand...

It was a soft dismissal.
 
miandadrules said:
It was a soft dismissal.
Click to expand...

What were you expecting him to do? Tuk tu. By tuk-ing, he would never get out, but dry the run rate at the same time. I don't want that. I want a player to attack if it means playing risky shot that has 110% of getting out. This is T20. Hit or miss [out].
 
MalikMohsin said:
What were you expecting him to do? Tuk tu. By tuk-ing, he would never get out, but dry the run rate at the same time. I don't want that. I want a player to attack if it means playing risky shot that has 110% of getting out. This is T20. Hit or miss [out].
Click to expand...

If your going to slash, then slash hard, otherwise drop it and run. Basic death batting.

Don't waste balls.
 
The Shoaib Malik 'Support' Thread

miandadrules said:
If your going to slash, then slash hard, otherwise drop it and run. Basic death batting.

Don't waste balls.
Click to expand...

Have you seen his strike rate? I bet it's around 100 in last three years. Wasting balls is his speciality.
 
SS..... did you see how Malik's presence in the field INSPIRED Junaid to get this wicket...... and not to mention, helped Ajmal focus to take the catch?
 
^ That's his favorite shot. That shot is also quite some risky too. He scored 50 in the last T20 that way. People didn't complain about that. Let him play the way he does. Beside, he doesn't play that way in ODI. ODI is a different game, and Malik is different player in ODI. Let's reserve some judgement in ODI, shall we?

Opener just got out due to hitting. Sometimes, you don't hit well, and the price is your wicket. That's T20. You have to take some risks. You can't tuk tuk to protect your wicket in T20. That is liability.
 
MalikMohsin said:
What were you expecting him to do? Tuk tu. By tuk-ing, he would never get out, but dry the run rate at the same time. I don't want that. I want a player to attack if it means playing risky shot that has 110% of getting out. This is T20. Hit or miss [out].
Click to expand...

He plays this shot a lot...
scored so so many runs with this shot...
but now teams have figured this out ... and they have countered his shot...(vs Aus and vs India in AC) he got out in similar fashion...

it's a risky shot...so he needs to think about it.
 
miandadrules said:
If your going to slash, then slash hard, otherwise drop it and run. Basic death batting.

Don't waste balls.
Click to expand...

Don't waste your breath at somebody who does not have CLUE what soft dismissal means!
 
MalikMohsin said:
^ That's his favorite shot. That shot is also quite some risky too. He scored 50 in the last T20 that way. People didn't complain about that. Let him play the way he does. Beside, he doesn't play that way in ODI. ODI is a different game, and Malik is different player in ODI. Let's reserve some judgement in ODI, shall we?

Opener just got out due to hitting. Sometimes, you don't hit well, and the price is your wicket. That's T20. You have to take some risks. You can't tuk tuk to protect your wicket in T20. That is liability.
Click to expand...

Why are you talking about ODIs?

I said there are better options for T20.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

FearlessRoar
  • Poll Poll
[PICTURES/VIDEOS] Is Shoaib Malik suited for a coaching role?
Replies
40
Views
1K
FearlessRoar
FearlessRoar
C
"This is not PSL, this is international cricket": Shoaib Malik
Replies
48
Views
2K
mominsaigol
mominsaigol
FearlessRoar
"Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan should open if high-scoring games aren't happening in the World Cup": Shoaib Malik
Replies
69
Views
2K
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
T
The eerie 1994 Test series between New Zealand and Pakistan with some lessons
Replies
22
Views
701
Banda298
B
MenInG
POTW: TheSultan
Replies
10
Views
501
The Bald Eagle
The Bald Eagle
Back
Top