Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Typical one performance per series... goes missing in the rest of the game
Another point to note here is that arthur realized very early that malik cannot be utilized as a slogger in the lower order and his strength is the middle order. he takes time to get going and can play a long innings and build partnerships. he struggled down the order in the first 4 odis in england before he got promoted in the 5th and played a top knock.
arthur has been very sharp in identifying these intricate details. promoting shafiq in tests, making babar number 3 in odis and t20s and now promoting malik as well. waqar lacked all these qualities.
for your sake i hope he fails in the third odi
for your sake i hope he fails in the third odi
Shoaib Malik gets a free pass in the side for performing in one game per series since England 2015, however when Azhar does it then it becomes a 'dead rubber'
lol, wasn't it a dead rubber???
Azhar also performed in one game in the series, didn't he???
I'm up to criticize his bad performances but some people are here for nothing but hate.
Well not really, Azhar did well against England, whereas Malik traditionally has been playing only in dead rubbers since 2015 England in UAE..
Malik's one performance per series has been a continuous trend since England 2015.. yet he is in the side
well I guess when given the chance at no.4, he proved it! he is not a lower order hitter.
His 90 was better then Azhar's 100 and I'm sure you wan't argue their.
Overall, his performance has been way better and far more 'affective' then Azhar.
Bowled really well today. Against a couple of tailenders though it has to be said
The Don averaging almost 60 since 2015
Any sense of how that compares to others who have played alongside him? The opposition has been quite...modest for much of this time. Hafeez, and at first Azhar, have also looked formidable in the past two years.
Maybe, but the runs don't score themselves and he doesn't deserve to get dropped for now.
Completely irrelevant what he deserves. The only question selectors need ask is whether it is better for the team to play someone else in his place. And there are some interesting contenders waiting in the wings.
Is it true that Mian was the Man of The Series? Looks like Sislkotia has his lobby among the sponsors as well.
....So the openers were tailenders? Kraige Braith., Samule, Bravo are the ones he bowled to...
It is relevant, if he was failing then he'd deserve to be dropped and the interesting contenders waiting in the wings could get a look
No, he does not have to fail to be replaced, he has to be less good than the next comer.
One failure with bat and usual suspects out in full force.
Incredible bowling today. Looked like the Saqlain replica of '03.
Good show by Malik
Played 7 out of total 9 matches,
Not out once, three 50s
We expect similar performance in Australia.
Good show by Malik
Played 7 out of total 9 matches,
Not out once, three 50s
We expect similar performance in Australia.
Stanlake won't play...Malik should hope none of Stanlake or Cummins play otherwise 92mph Bouncers and Malik won't be able to cope as usual.
Malik should hope none of Stanlake or Cummins play otherwise 92mph Bouncers and Malik won't be able to cope as usual.
Only match that we won in England was due to malik and sarfraz.
Let's hope Malik improves on his colossal average of 24 in ODIs in Australia at a SR of 64.
Malik should hope none of Stanlake or Cummins play otherwise 92mph Bouncers and Malik won't be able to cope as usual.
Cummins was bowling rubbish last time he played internationally. Don't see him troubling Shobby.
he should retired soon from ODIS too within next 2-3 series.
he is 35 and WC is 2.5 years away. PCB should select younger players now
He is having the highest batting avg during last two years for Pakistan.
This would be insane to ask for his retirement.
he can finish his career on high then
he avg 34 after 240 games whch is not good enough
test amtches are different, but in ODIs, every team look to built for next WC, and he ll be 37.5 years old by next WC. and he is going be in same position where YK was in 2015 WC.
anyway this series should decide his future.
Okay, he retired from tests on high notes, his best batting and bowling performances came during his last series.
I believe he would do similar for ODI and t20 retirement.
And for the record and for perspective, he avgs, 43 at his correct position of #4
He was asked by micky to bat at lower order and no surprise he did not perform at 6, and then he was moved to #4 and he (with sarfraz) won us the match.at position 4 ? selective stats are never good.
just one series before WI series, against England , he was batting at 6 in most matches. so are you talking abt last 4 matches ?
He was asked by micky to bat at lower order and no surprise he did not perform at 6, and then he was moved to #4 and he (with sarfraz) won us the match.
He has similar avg at #3 and #2., basically he is wasted at lower order.
so you are talking abt 4 innings for selective avg.
which have 2 single digit scores and 2 fifties.
again are you happy to take 37+ yr old into WC in England ?
and again this series should decide where Malik stands, BTW he avg 24 in Australia in 13 matches
so you are talking abt 4 innings for selective avg.
which have 2 single digit scores and 2 fifties.
again are you happy to take 37+ yr old into WC in England ?
and again this series should decide where Malik stands, BTW he avg 24 in Australia in 13 matches
No, it's 79 matches for top 4 batting positions with 41+ avg.
And for same position, in aus, avg is 28+.
Core message is that he should play at #4 as he avg 33+ in aus at #4.
No, it's 79 matches for top 4 batting positions with 41+ avg.
And for same position, in aus, avg is 28+.
Core message is that he should play at #4 as he avg 33+ in aus at #4.
even though, avg of 28 is nothing to b proud of in any way.
u still avoiding main questoin, ll u take 37+ years old into WC in England or he should leave this place for now to Haris Sohail (who should b fit now hopefully) or for other emerging players ?
i am not that good in digging stats, someone need to find out where those 27 matches were played at number 4 and against which opposition
even though, avg of 28 is nothing to b proud of in any way.
u still avoiding main questoin, ll u take 37+ years old into WC in England or he should leave this place for now to Haris Sohail (who should b fit now hopefully) or for other emerging players ?
i am not that good in digging stats, someone need to find out where those 27 matches were played at number 4 and against which opposition
Malik should hope none of Stanlake or Cummins play otherwise 92mph Bouncers and Malik won't be able to cope as usual.
Stanlake won't play...
Cummins was bowling rubbish last time he played internationally. Don't see him troubling Shobby.
Remember :
1. Bounce
&
2. Pace
And this thread addressee
Have a rishta (relation) of 18 years.
Probably 1-2 years lesser than your age
Now with Hazlewood, Starc, Cummins & Stanlake it would be decided whether Malik will play WC2019 or not.
Now is his real test. Forget about performances against Bangladesh, Zimbabwe & Srilanka in last two years for a moment now.
Come on Malik turn it on. Time for record ki durusdagi against Top pace bowling line ups. 18 years turn it around now.
Go Malik Go
Seem jump and hop like he always does against pace.
He's even afraid to put bat on ball. I've literally seen fear in his eyes.
He should return to test cricket, he can be the senior figure in the team after Misbah/Younis. I think it'll be a solid middle order with Malik, Babar, Shafiq
Malik himself knows he's not good enough for test cricket yet his fans continue to live in fairyland.
Malik played 23 innings in top 5 positions and averaged 42+ and scored 4 50s, 2 100s and one double. Not breath taking, but better than most.
He is one of very few Pakistani batsmen to score 200.
Sadly, in 62% of innings he was sent #6 and lower and he avg 30 in those too.
IMO, he retired from Test Crickert as no one watches cricket and its not compatible with his role as leading T20 league player.
I am sorry what ?? EXPLAIN PLEASE !!!!!
Malik played 23 innings in top 5 positions and averaged 42+ and scored 4 50s, 2 100s and one double. Not breath taking, but better than most.
He is one of very few Pakistani batsmen to score 200.
Sadly, in 62% of innings he was sent #6 and lower and he avg 30 in those too.
IMO, he retired from Test Crickert as no one watches cricket and its not compatible with his role as leading T20 league player.
No, he retired because he's simply not good enough to play test cricket, just like his more popular and talented team-mate, Shahid Afridi.
That is just your misinformed opinion.
I provided evidence which clearly tells that you are false. And you failed to refute those points.
Just read waqar's interview on pp, where he touched this query.
No, he retired because he's simply not good enough to play test cricket, just like his more popular and talented team-mate, Shahid Afridi.
And I am providing you with a reality check in the form of Malik's retirement from test cricket. Read his own comments on his retirement and forget about what someone else says.
Malik is miles ahead of ODI TTF Shafiq.