I'm sorry, you completely ignored the fact that you're statement about Malik being a statistically superior batsmen to Younis is wrong. You're bringing in the intangible, like Woolmer and Inzi's opinion. Why can't I talk about all the crunch matches that Younis has played in tests?
Unfair to call one trash and the other a crisis man when they have the same exact stats. Why not just say both are rubbish?
The not outs were in reference to AZ's post about Fawad, you'd know this if you'd bother to read the thread.
Secondly if you read my post you'd realize that having more not outs in less matches than Younis will certainly inflate his average more. It's not a hard concept, Malik has 21 in 192 games and Younis 20 in 221. Again this was more just to rub it in AZ's face since he seems to hate on Fawad's "inflated" average.
When you drop a player, at what point do you know he's become better? Malik has played at the international level for years now without improving, it's expected of him to perform at the domestic. It's good that he's performing and most definitely he should be looked at for a recall.
However, why should he be preferred over a similarly performing youngster who is yet to debut? That player can be moulded at the international level, Malik at the rip age of 29, cannot.
People need to accept that Malik is equal to Younis at the ODI level. No if's, and's, or intangibles can change the statistics.
