Shoaib Malik Support & Performance Watch

Should Malik be in the plans for the 2019 WC?


  • Total voters
    421
  • Poll closed .
After you ruined YK congrat thread, you tried your best to ruin YK interview thread with this comment but... I am bringing it here;

I do not expect him to be around when we tour NZL/EnG/Aus.
You did not expect a lot of things .....didn't you!
You didn't expect Malik to fail so many times. (38 times Sep 29, 2009).
You didn't expect Malik to get kicked out of the team so many times.
You didn't expect Malik to carry drinks under Misbah.
etc. etc. etc.

Plus, lol @ thinking about (no) retirement...
(in Pakistan no one takes retirement seriously due to U-Turns and players met natural fate :moyo)

Unfortunately nobody takes getting kicked out of the team :malik ...failures after failures... is also not taken seriously by the jokers like Ilyas who keep selecting ... because either they don't know anything about selection :farhat or PPP's govt is forcing them.
 
After you ruined YK congrat thread, you tried your best to ruin YK interview thread with this comment but... I am bringing it here;


You did not expect a lot of things .....didn't you!
You didn't expect Malik to fail so many times. (38 times Sep 29, 2009).
You didn't expect Malik to get kicked out of the team so many times.
You didn't expect Malik to carry drinks under Misbah.
etc. etc. etc.



Unfortunately nobody takes getting kicked out of the team :malik ...failures after failures... is also not taken seriously by the jokers like Ilyas who keep selecting ... because either they don't know anything about selection :farhat or PPP's govt is forcing them.

what's the question/objection?
 
That you keep giving your damn opinions without any damn supporting data........





How? Where...?? and how does it compare to your Bradman?

here are few:

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showpost.php?p=2499880&postcount=242
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showpost.php?p=2701246&postcount=449
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showpost.php?p=2702657&postcount=470
http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showpost.php?p=2736427&postcount=586


but i am not so keen abt YK...so i'll leave with that.
 
Last edited:
posted on March 2010

"and how many under twenty scores?
45% of the times Mr YK failed to cross 25.
Here is that SMALL list:
12
8
2
0
23
4
2
23
0
4
1
17
0
19
5
0
5
4
8
1
2
0
14
17
23
9
1
0
0
7
0
0
8
9
11
20
8
0
6
3
7
23
0
25
3
0
2
19
"
 
How about Feb 4th 2012?????

lajja aati hai YK's innings shamil kartey huay?


Why??? Aaj aap ki mehndi ki rasam hai...aur hathoon main mehndi lagi hui hai?

have you noticed that this stat was in reference to Malik

Let Malik play few series (test) and I'd update...
 
Guys, I am consistent on my stand about YK...so it's not related to his today's 100.

In fact I am glad that he is just validating my stand.

He may end up being the highest scorer of the series (already got the highest average) even after below average performance in other innings and thats my point that he is a very unreliable and risky inclusion for #3 (now at #4)
 
Last edited:
Younis Khan is a team man who can inspire our team and youngsters.

Shoaib Malik does not have the ability to do so.
 
The fact that you are comparing YK to Malik shows what kind of IQ you have.

Please, if you want to save any credibility please send the mods a PM and tell them you want your account deactivated.
 
posted on March 2010

"and how many under twenty scores?
45% of the times Mr YK failed to cross 25.

"

Who are you BULL-$hitting with your false, outdated and fabricated stats....not to mention your blatant lies.

Here is the latest and greatest...updated/current stats... because I did not make them... here is where I got the data from;
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting
 
The fact that you are comparing YK to Malik shows what kind of IQ you have.

.

Correction:
He thinks he has IQ of 300 and everybody else on this forum has an IQ od 30.
 
YK flourished under Malik...

even he became a decent ODI performer due to Malik.


All PPers.... let's thank Misbah for today's brilliant 100 from YK..... since YK just flourished under Misbah.
 
lol BZ in that post you were butt-hurt about Malik not getting the same chances at YK

The guy just had like 10 ODI matches to prove himself. He failed against the likes of Bangladesh trololol If he can't get a run in ODI matches against BANGLADESH, Why should he get a place in a test team where it is much harder to get runs in the first place and on top of that facing much better opposition.

Please, you are a laughing stock on this forum. You should draw the line somewhere and stop debating this issue.
 
lol BZ in that post you were butt-hurt about Malik not getting the same chances at YK
.
:))
Why do you think, he is posting today after YK's 100?


Please, you are a laughing stock on this forum. You should draw the line somewhere and stop debating this issue.

Shhhhhhh...... don't give him facts.... he does not like them.

Plus, if stopped posting, how would we be laughing then? :P
 
:)) true true, you have a good point...forgive me BZ, put those suicide thoughts to one side for the moment..we need you to continue debating :)
 
Who are you BULL-$hitting with your false, outdated and fabricated stats....not to mention your blatant lies.

Here is the latest and greatest...updated/current stats... because I did not make them... here is where I got the data from;
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting

As you wanted me to do the math again so I want to make it extra embarrassing for YK fans (Not against YK)

Here are numbers for less than 10 runs vs 10 or more against major teams:


YK: 30.83%
Malik: 26.92%

it's a very embarrassing situation for a #3 batsman, who is supposed to provide foundation... when comparing with a #6/7 player.
 
lol BZ in that post you were butt-hurt about Malik not getting the same chances at YK

The guy just had like 10 ODI matches to prove himself. He failed against the likes of Bangladesh trololol If he can't get a run in ODI matches against BANGLADESH, Why should he get a place in a test team where it is much harder to get runs in the first place and on top of that facing much better opposition.

Please, you are a laughing stock on this forum. You should draw the line somewhere and stop debating this issue.

maybe you couldn't figure out, that post was about "TESTS"
 
I feel like singing this song for Younus right now

Zehar hai ke pyaar hai, teri century Younus? (considering the amount of love and hate it has brought) :facepalm:
 
As you wanted me to do the math again so I want to make it extra embarrassing for YK fans (Not against YK)

Here are numbers for less than 10 runs vs 10 or more against major teams:

posted on March 2010

"and how many under twenty scores?
45% of the times Mr YK failed to cross 25.


Post 6194 mein table ka jawab detay huay lajja aati hai???
But then again, if you knew the meaning of lajja, you wouldn't be posting here. ;-)

First you bring up 25 run or less innings..... I prove to a complete and blatant liar..... now (without even mentioning my reply about <25 runs %) you bring up 10 runs or less innings! :))) :)))

Answer to my <25 runs post above .....then I'll embarrass you one more time.... which would approximately 5285th time!
 
Post 6194 mein table ka jawab detay huay lajja aati hai???
But then again, if you knew the meaning of lajja, you wouldn't be posting here. ;-)

First you bring up 25 run or less innings..... I prove to a complete and blatant liar..... now (without even mentioning my reply about <25 runs %) you bring up 10 runs or less innings! :))) :)))

Answer to my <25 runs post above .....then I'll embarrass you one more time.... which would approximately 5285th time!

You missed i said I wanted data to be extra embarrassing for YK worshipers... (lowered the bar to reaching double digit for a supposed GREAT/LEGEND #3 batsman)

YK failed to reach double-digit 30% of the times...

Isn't embarrassing?


Ok, I excluded every other position but #3

and failure %age increases to 32.9% (it's 1/3 of times)

Isn't embarrassing?

If not, then congratulation as

"You are shame-proof"
 
If your IQ is 143 then Shahzebayub has an IQ of 543....



As they say...... who he think of himself as too wise/smart.... is... what?? ;-)

I.Q. is related to intelligence
and not to wisdom/smartness.

I am glad to know that Shahzebayub got a extremely high I.Q.

what you say about one who tries to mock others (i.e. I.Q. of 300/543)
 
With every passing series Maliks task of matching YK is getting harder and harder.

18 hundreds in 41 games.

Surely Malik can do it in his sleep.
 
I can't believe that someone really wants to make some competition between Younus Khan and Shoaib Malik, that's like comparing an insignificant rock to a towering mountain.

Black Zero, waiting for your analysis on how Imran Farhat is Don Bradman's left-handed twin.
 
I can't believe that someone really wants to make some competition between Younus Khan and Shoaib Malik, that's like comparing an insignificant rock to a towering mountain.

Black Zero, waiting for your analysis on how Imran Farhat is Don Bradman's left-handed twin.

BZ claims YK and Malik are similar kind of test batsmen. Only difference is that YK has played more.
 
I can't believe that someone really wants to make some competition between Younus Khan and Shoaib Malik, that's like comparing an insignificant rock to a towering mountain.

Black Zero, waiting for your analysis on how Imran Farhat is Don Bradman's left-handed twin.

I care less about YK or Farhat (though Farhat won a test against NZL in NZL while as per MoYO, YK chickened-out)

If you go through the above posts, you would know that I was practically forced to present YK's stats...

I do not know if you are YK fan or not ...if you are, would you mind defending:

"1/3 times failed to reach double-digit while playing at #3"

If you are not his fan, then pass on...
 
BZ claims YK and Malik are similar kind of test batsmen. Only difference is that YK has played more.

Thanks.
but let me add:

- both are not talented/gifted
- rely on hardwork/determination
- Good against spinners (who is better, depends on the day)
- YK, less likely to settle, but once settle, will most likely to score big while Malik most like to settle but least likely to score big.
- Both are FTB
- Both can't play seam or swing (i.e. conditions favoring pace bowlers) Though overall Malik is better.
- Both are good runner (also good fielder)
- Both got similar career path
- YK is the product of Parchi while SM came through real hardwork.

and many more like if we compensate for batting positions, stats of YK and Malik are extremely extremely similar.
 
Last edited:
Thanks.
but let me add:

- both are not talented/gifted
- rely on hardwork/determination
- Good against spinners (who is better, depends on the day)
- YK, less likely to settle, but once settle, will most likely to score big while Malik most like to settle but least likely to score big.
- Both are FTB
- Both can't play seam or swing (i.e. conditions favoring pace bowlers) Though overall Malik is better.
- Both are good runner (also good fielder)
- Both got similar career path
- YK is the product of Parchi while SM came through real hardwork.

and many more like if we compensate for batting positions, stats of YK and Malik are extremely extremely similar.

I would let WL deal with this point to point.

My laptop is not charging.
 
Right, not been in here before, and will post just the once. First a few questions -

How does a support thread for Shoaib Malik reach 6,000 posts?
How does a support thread for Shoaib Malik reach 6 posts?
How does a support thread for Shoaib Malik...exist at all?

I don't know why either side of the argument has dedicated their time or energy to this mammoth thread. Not just a bad player but a forgettable and redundant one.

He's darn awful. I have never met a single person who has rated him. Legit one of the worst players to be selected for 30+ tests. Ever. What a waste of time.
 
I would let WL deal with this point to point.

My laptop is not charging.

in other thread, Khabri wanted WL to deal with me...and now you too SS


(Khabri also edited my post, misuse of authority :CH Iftikhar)

Go to nearest comp shop and buy a new laptop (YK ki ijjat ka swal hay, PP pe Bhagwan ka apman)
 
Right, not been in here before, and will post just the once. First a few questions -

How does a support thread for Shoaib Malik reach 6,000 posts?
How does a support thread for Shoaib Malik reach 6 posts?
How does a support thread for Shoaib Malik...exist at all?

I don't know why either side of the argument has dedicated their time or energy to this mammoth thread. Not just a bad player but a forgettable and redundant one.

He's darn awful. I have never met a single person who has rated him. Legit one of the worst players to be selected for 30+ tests. Ever. What a waste of time.

http://www.pakpassion.net/ppforum/showthread.php?t=146745

Now UK is at 9th place.
 
in other thread, Khabri wanted WL to deal with me...and now you too SS


(Khabri also edited my post, misuse of authority :CH Iftikhar)

Go to nearest comp shop and buy a new laptop (YK ki ijjat ka swal hay, PP pe Bhagwan ka apman)

It's sat night here 11.30pm, heavy snow and horrible driving conditions. And I would rather watch highlights of YK hundred.
 
I care less about YK or Farhat (though Farhat won a test against NZL in NZL while as per MoYO, YK chickened-out)

If you go through the above posts, you would know that I was practically forced to present YK's stats...

I do not know if you are YK fan or not ...if you are, would you mind defending:

"1/3 times failed to reach double-digit while playing at #3"

If you are not his fan, then pass on...

I'm not a 'fan' of any individual, only the team matters, as cricket should be, though I would have succumbed to Imran Khan's charms if I was born some time earlier :heart:
In fact, until recently, I was FOR Shoaib Malik's inclusion as an ODI all-rounder (one of those who thought that he should have replaced Younis Khan for the WC) BUT to compare him with Younus Khan in Test cricket (as a captain and/or player) isn't serious, honestly, and seems very random.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully Malik will not be selected. If he does, let´s hope he performs for the sake of Pakistan. Simple. We cannot hope for Pakistan to lose just because of ONE player we dislike.
 
I'm not a 'fan' of any individual, only the team matters, as cricket should be, though I would have succumbed to Imran Khan's charms if I was born some time earlier :heart:
In fact, until recently, I was FOR Shoaib Malik's inclusion as an ODI all-rounder (one of those who thought that he should have replaced Younis Khan for the WC) BUT to compare him with Younus Khan in Test cricket (as a captain and/or player) isn't serious, honestly, and seems very random.

In that case, i would hope that you try to provide some sense of his failing 1/3 of time to reach double digit in tests while playing at crucial #3.
 
It's sat night here 11.30pm, heavy snow and horrible driving conditions. And I would rather watch highlights of YK hundred.

Strange it's also Saturday in Canada.

You watching highlights on tablet/laptop while driving or remote viewing?

2016psispy.jpg


p.s. I forgot to mention, WL could be busy watching Afridi's head & Shoulder ads so who is gonna answer "point by point" ?
 
Last edited:
In that case, i would hope that you try to provide some sense of his failing 1/3 of time to reach double digit in tests while playing at crucial #3.

Azhar Ali is playing at 3 nowadays.

Seriously, it is silly to compare Malik with YK in tests. As silly as comparing Sohail Tanvir with Shoaib Akhtar.
 
I think Moderators should seriously consider deleting this stupid thread.

I know certain posters like to argue with BZ just for the
sake of it and that they find his humilation quite
entertaining. But I'm sure players and maybe officials come to this site and it's disgraceful that there is a thread this big titled 'Support SM'.

Also, isn't it a little uncomfortable that someone who is clearly not of sound mind is being egged on here?
 
Last edited:
I support every player wearing, who wore the green shirt.

But unfortunately, SM is history now. Beside that he was always very average outside SC conditions.
 
Isn't embarrassing?

If not, then congratulation as

"You are shame-proof"

If you want to find out who is shameless, click on my signature and you'll get a statistical proof ...who OTHER people think is shameless ... instead just one person opinion who can not back up his opinion with the damn data.

You want the damn data.... click on my signature and you'll see who is PROVEN shameless.


Then.... you bring in YK's 0-25 innings.... and I threw the table on face proving you blatant liar/wrong/fabricator etc etc and ..... being the shameless person you are, you change the criteria to 10 run or less.

Being the shameless person you are, you still have not replied to my table about 0-25 scores.....and shamelessly changed the criteria to 0-10 runs.

Look.... I am going to embarrass you ONE more time. Watch and cry.....

Here is where I got the data from.....

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting


http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting


You were whining about comparing #3 to #6..... now watch where Umar Akmal and Asad Shafiq are as compared to you freaking worthless hero. :))

After you done crying...... please tell me... you have been emabrrased with 0-25 and 0-10 scores.... where should we go next....0-20, 0-30, 0-40, 0-49 .... take your pick! :))
 
If you want to find out who is shameless, click on my signature and you'll get a statistical proof ...who OTHER people think is shameless ... instead just one person opinion who can not back up his opinion with the damn data.

You want the damn data.... click on my signature and you'll see who is PROVEN shameless.


Then.... you bring in YK's 0-25 innings.... and I threw the table on face proving you blatant liar/wrong/fabricator etc etc and ..... being the shameless person you are, you change the criteria to 10 run or less.

Being the shameless person you are, you still have not replied to my table about 0-25 scores.....and shamelessly changed the criteria to 0-10 runs.

Look.... I am going to embarrass you ONE more time. Watch and cry.....

Here is where I got the data from.....

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting


http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting


You were whining about comparing #3 to #6..... now watch where Umar Akmal and Asad Shafiq are as compared to you freaking worthless hero. :))

After you done crying...... please tell me... you have been emabrrased with 0-25 and 0-10 scores.... where should we go next....0-20, 0-30, 0-40, 0-49 .... take your pick! :))

Breaking NEWS

if you score 10, you already reached double digit.

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting

plus there are other flaws...find yourself.
Please do not waste my time! I am watching movie.
 
A player is assessed by test cricket :imran

It is the ultimate test of ones ability, temperament.
OK
Lets him play 25/30 test matches outside SC so we have a reasonable sample set for Aus/Eng/NZL/ENG/WI.

and
then we criticize and or appreciate him.
 
OK
Lets him play 25/30 test matches outside SC so we have a reasonable sample set for Aus/Eng/NZL/ENG/WI.

and
then we criticize and or appreciate him.





sorry, we ain't that desperate to give a total failure anymore chances...you want him to have more chances, make your own team up!

We are doing wonderfully well without the back stabbings
 
OK
Lets him play 25/30 test matches outside SC so we have a reasonable sample set for Aus/Eng/NZL/ENG/WI.

and
then we criticize and or appreciate him.

Chances based on what? A first class average in the early thirties. Thanks, but no thanks.
 
plus there are other flaws...find yourself.
Please do not waste my time! I am watching movie.

:))

Because those flaws are making your Bradman only look like Richards .... not Bradman? Enlighten me on those "flaws"??


Breaking NEWS

if you score 10, you already reached double digit.

http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...size=200;team=7;template=results;type=batting

Sooooo you throwing toys out of the pram because there is difference of WHOLE ONE FREAKING RUN between NINE and TEN??? :)))

Oh ..... while you were sobbing and whinning about the difference between 9 & 10 runs, I looked at scores of (0-49) runs.... see where your Bradman stands..... :))

Ladies & gentlemen.... drum roll.......let another BZ-tantrum begin! ;-)

Just in case you have hard time deciphering the meaning of chart below..... with your 143 IQ, here is what it means...

Azahar Ali has failed to reach a score of minimum 50 (gotten out) 21 times.
He also has 15 scores of 50 or greater ....
Adding above two numbers ... 21+15....= 36 innings
...this meaning, if does not remain not out between 0-49,
he fails to reach 50 only 58.33% (21 out of 36) of the times.
 
Last edited:
:))

Because those flaws are making your Bradman only look like Richards .... not Bradman? Enlighten me on those "flaws"??




Sooooo you throwing toys out of the pram because there is difference of WHOLE ONE FREAKING RUN between NINE and TEN??? :)))

Oh ..... while you were sobbing and whinning about the difference between 9 & 10 runs, I looked at scores of (0-49) runs.... see where your Bradman stands..... :))

Is it a fair assessment that you admitting your mistake in calculation?

Is it also fair to assume that you conceded point (that YK failed to reach double-digit more than SM) as now you are not even mentioning it?

Is it a safe conclusion that you embarrassed of YK's (as he plays at #3) 1/3 times failure to reach double digit?


I hope you will never doubt me again....

P.S. it's not an embarrassing situation if you don't reach 50... but not reaching double digit 1/3 of times when you bat at #3 (number shoots to 32.9% for YK :facepalm: if we just consider batting at #3)
 
Last edited:
Is it a fair assessment that you admitting your mistake in calculation?

Is it also fair to assume that you conceded point (that YK failed to reach double-digit more than SM) as now you are not even mentioning it?

Is it a safe conclusion that you embarrassed of YK's (as he plays at #3) 1/3 times failure to reach double digit?


I hope you will never doubt me again....

P.S. it's not an embarrassing situation if you don't reach 50... but not reaching double digit 1/3 of times when you bat at #3 (number shoots to 32.9% for YK :facepalm: if we just consider batting at #3)

:)) Still whining about 9 vs 10 runs?

No comment about 0-25 runs????? Any embarrassment about that?
No comment about 0-49 runs????? Any embarrassment about that?

P.S. it's not an embarrassing situation if you don't reach 50... but not reaching double digit 1/3 of times when you bat at #3 (number shoots to 32.9% for YK :facepalm: if we just consider batting at #3)
:))
So the test cricket is about reaching double figures ...... not 50??? :)))


You Bradman failed to reach 50 80% of time.... isn't embarrassment to Bramdman's 10-year old fans who think their I is 143....!
 
Whether people hate him or like him, but can't live without him - :malik

I feel for you guys. I have moved on, but you guys are still there. Take a break from this thread, you guys. LOL :yk

So, this thread is basically recycling now.
 
:)) Still whining about 9 vs 10 runs?

No comment about 0-25 runs????? Any embarrassment about that?
No comment about 0-49 runs????? Any embarrassment about that?


:))
So the test cricket is about reaching double figures ...... not 50??? :)))


You Bradman failed to reach 50 80% of time.... isn't embarrassment to Bramdman's 10-year old fans who think their I is 143....!


Reminder: SS assigned you to defend YK

Defend YK ...why he failed 1/3 times to reach double digit while playing at crucial #3?

I promise I'll defend Malik's 80% for not reaching 50, once you concede the point.

I repeat, I promise I promise I'll defend Malik's 80% for not reaching 50, once you concede the point.
 
Reminder: SS assigned you to defend YK

Defend YK ...why he failed 1/3 times to reach double digit while playing at crucial #3?

I promise I'll defend Malik's 80% for not reaching 50, once you concede the point.

I repeat, I promise I promise I'll defend Malik's 80% for not reaching 50, once you concede the point.

I don't have to defend .... I repeat I don't have to defend YK...... because Younis Khan is defending himself in UAE with the bat... like he always does .....

Now ...your Bradman on the other hand desperately needs somebody like you defending him based on some stupid stupid stats and the whining about difference between 9 and 10 runs..... and failing miserably. Just like he has failed in last 38 international innings! ;-)

Keep going... we are having fun... all you are doing is ... "butt-burning" (as somebody said above) yourself because of YK's phenomenal success & records.... :))

Read and burn some more........ please; :P
 
Last edited:
I don't have to defend .... I repeat I don't have to defend YK...... because Younis Khan is defending himself in UAE with the bat... like he always does .....

Now ...your Bradman on the other hand desperately needs somebody like you defending him based on some stupid stupid stats and the whining about difference between 9 and 10 runs..... and failing miserably. Just like he has failed in last 38 international innings! ;-)

Keep going... we are having fun... all you are doing is ... "butt-burning" (as somebody said above) yourself because of YK's phenomenal success & records.... :))

Read and burn some more........ please; :P

Wow, change of mood in few hours...
earlier asking me to back statements with data ..
and when I provided, no one is ready to defend YK...

As MM said it's recycling going on, so haters please go through this thread...ALL of your objections/complains/taunts are being addressed satisfactorily.

and if in doubt, check my signature

and

deal with it.
 
As MM said it's recycling going on, so haters please go through this thread./QUOTE]
Keeping loving ... lover.... someday he might leave Sania for you! :P


Wow, change of mood in few hours...
earlier asking me to back statements with data ..
and when I provided, no one is ready to defend YK...
:))

I did not provide data? :)))
Complete BS...... another LIE.....

Here one more time....
 
Last edited:
To be fair, he is single handedly battling all the critics alone, and hasn't resorted to personal yet so far. Although, i can't say the same about other. ^ W63L65.
Just in case, you are new to the thread.... HE STARTED GETTING PERSONAL first.

He posted Pinocchio's picture in reply to my thread ... and called me a liar.


Islam teaches us to love, but not to hate. :afridi

BZ also hates YK & Mohammad Yousaf .... but you never mention that?? Why do lecture about Islam & hate to fans who don't want Malik in the team?

Islam teaches us to be fair Mr. Mohsin "I am the only one following Islam" Malik???
 
Islam also teaches us to be fair. Do you think BZ is fair with his analyses that YK and Malik are similar test players.

And what about this post of yours?


Posted by MM in another thread.

Kevin Pietersen for me. After Ijaz Ahmed from Pakistan, who literally slaughtered Australia in both formats consistently.

The only name comes to my mind now is Pietersen. He is danger man for Australia as much as Shoaib Malik is to India. What Pietersen has achieved against South Africa and Australia (at their nations) is something Younus Khan will never able to achieve at all.

Younus Khan, supposedly to be good at slow pitches, struggled heavily against quality bowling attack recently before recent 100 century. It's kind of terrifying as the tour of South Africa will be expected at 2013 will literally traumatized Younus Khan average.
Pietersen has earned it. Although, he is expected to struggle in turner pitches as much as our batting line including Younus Khan, are expected to struggle in green pitches. Overall, Pietersen has impressed me with his ability to dominate the quality bowling attack consistently.
 
Just in case, you are new to the thread.... HE STARTED GETTING PERSONAL first.

He posted Pinocchio's picture in reply to my thread ... and called me a liar.




BZ also hates YK & Mohammad Yousaf .... but you never mention that?? Why do lecture about Islam & hate to fans who don't want Malik in the team?

Islam teaches us to be fair Mr. Mohsin "I am the only one following Islam" Malik???

incorrect...
I have so many times YK and SM are similar ..unees bees ka farq hay

Regarding MoYo, I said he got seniority complex and I criticized him of his tactics in Australia..
 
Islam also teaches us to be fair. Do you think BZ is fair with his analyses that YK and Malik are similar test players.

And what about this post of yours?


Posted by MM in another thread.

Kevin Pietersen for me. After Ijaz Ahmed from Pakistan, who literally slaughtered Australia in both formats consistently.

The only name comes to my mind now is Pietersen. He is danger man for Australia as much as Shoaib Malik is to India. What Pietersen has achieved against South Africa and Australia (at their nations) is something Younus Khan will never able to achieve at all.

Younus Khan, supposedly to be good at slow pitches, struggled heavily against quality bowling attack recently before recent 100 century. It's kind of terrifying as the tour of South Africa will be expected at 2013 will literally traumatized Younus Khan average.
Pietersen has earned it. Although, he is expected to struggle in turner pitches as much as our batting line including Younus Khan, are expected to struggle in green pitches. Overall, Pietersen has impressed me with his ability to dominate the quality bowling attack consistently.


Even :moyo would agree with MM said

:Moyo said on TV that :yk chickened out for NZL series
 
Back
Top