Mamoon
ATG
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2012
- Runs
- 104,308
- Post of the Week
- 12
Jokes aside, respect for AZ for not shying away from expressing his views. Sitting on the fence is easy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Scored 19 ball 50 with 6 sixes
We're NOT on the fence; Tanvir is an extremely mediocre cricketer in all formats other than T20s, even there he should never be an automatic selection, let alone being the captain which is a laughable suggestion.Jokes aside, respect for AZ for not shying away from expressing his views. Sitting on the fence is easy.
Very entertaining innings and I'm happy for him. But let's not forget that he basically smashed two bowlers for 3 sixes each. Pollard and the other mediocre guy are some of the worst bowlers.Scored 19 ball 50 with 6 sixes
Why not?So lets make him the captain, right?
Jokes aside, respect for AZ for not shying away from expressing his views. Sitting on the fence is easy.
Our best pacer in T20Is? Certainly not. That has to be Gul, even after his recent dip in form.
Plus, if we make Tanvir our T20I skipper, chances are that he'll make it to the ODI/Test line-ups as well - can't afford that to happen at any cost!
Say for debate's sake, Gul is the best. That makes Tanvir the second best doesn't it? And that still warrants a place in the side. He's our best new ball bowler as well.
Warrants a place in the T20 side, sure, but not as captain!
Warrants a place in the T20 side, sure, but not as captain!
LOL great, so you want a captain that the players can't even look up to? A captain who is not amongst the best in the team should focus more on improving as a player rather than leading the side.Since when does the captain need to be the best player in the team? He just needs to be a regular fixture in the line-up, and possess leadership traits.
LOL great, so you want a captain that the players can't even look up to? A captain who is not amongst the best in the team should focus more on improving as a player rather than leading the side.
So then I guess you are ruling out the likes of Shehzad and Umar right? Since they are also youngsters, and need to focus on their own game first.
You high? Don't just start 'guessing' things.
Umar and Shehzad are amongst the best and therefore are candidates to lead the side. Tanvir, on the other hand...
is my pick for T20 captaincy.
Take your gay fantasies elsewhere.
Thats your opinion. Look at it like this: Umar and Shehzad are immature and hotheaded, while Tanvir is a mature, experienced and calm cricketer. Umar and Shehzad are in their early 20's, and they arent likely to get much respect from the likes of Afridi and Hafeez, while Tanvir is touching 30, and has been around for a long time. Tanvir has captained before, Umar and Shehzad havent.
By no means am I against having Umar or Shehzad as our captain, I'm just willing to see the pros and cons.
Mamoon supports cricketers whom other PAK fans do not.
And Mamoon doesn't support those who most PAK fans do.
Mamoon supports cricketers whom other PAK fans do not.
And Mamoon doesn't support those who most PAK fans do.
Who is a better candidate for captaincy? he's a battle-hardened T20 performer and you won't find a note experienced campaigner at the age of 29. I have always supported his inclusion in this format but this rally for captaincy is a new development.
I must commend AZ for his foresight and judgment.
So now to be a captain, you have to be experienced and calm only? Being one of the best players in the side is not a requirement?
If South Africa thought the same way, we wouldn't have got to see the brilliant captain in Smith for all these years.
Let's look at the front-runners and potential candidates for T20 captaincy.
Front-runners
Afridi
Shehzad
Gul
- Afridi is a tactical failure who has been our worst T20 captain to date. Within a year and a half, he took the World T20 champions to lows that had never seen before.
Patting players on the back and clapping all the time doesn't make you a good tactician.
- Shehzad will captain Pakistan in all formats one day, but he's not ready for the job yet and is too young. He needs to be more sensible and thoughtful over what he says in the media. His whining about people criticizing his approach in the World T20 and then following it up with a golden duck should be a lesion for him.
- Gul is not captaincy material. Period.
Potential candidates
Ajmal
Umar Akmal
Malik
Junaid
Maqsood
Tanvir
- Ajmal is too old and should retire from T20s. Also he's not leader material and is a bottler in World T20s. Other than his first edition in 2009, he hasn't lived up to the pre-tournament hype and expectations at all.
2010 -> lost us the tourney when Hussey took him to the cleaners.
2012 -> he was in his peak but still produced an average performance. Went into hiding in big games and the novice Raza Hasan bowled better than him.
2014 -> other than one over against Australia, he was rubbish.
- Umar Akmal is also a strong candidate for captaincy in all formats in the future but he's not ready yet. Also, contrary to proper belief, he handles himself more maturely in the media and interviews etc compared to Shehzad.
- Malik is a very experienced T20 cricketer and the greatest captain we have ever produced but his tenure for Pakistan was very controversial and also there's a question mark over his inclusion in the team.
- Junaid is not captaincy material and is the new Gul in more than one way.
- Maqsood will also be a prime candidate for captaincy in all formats in the future and he's the right age and has a good brain, but for now he should look to get his career back on track. Pretty average lately.
- Tanvir is not only a proven T20 performer on the field but also a proven performer on the mic . Always has good things to say and makes very intelligent and insightful comments. He knows his cricket and is a very sound analyst. Doesn't beat around the bush and is straight to the point. Self-assured and confident attitude.
Prior captaincy experience isn't really a prerequisite but no doubt it's an added merit. Yes his decisions seem egoistic at times, but in retrospect, I believe it's for the betterment of the team.
He is one of the most active and experienced T20 cricket in the world and is perfect age wise as well.
Giving captaincy to him now will be a very prudent decision. His captaincy should be evaluated after the World T20 2016 and if he's not up to the mark, the likes of Shehzad, Umar and Maqsood would be in a better position to succeed him.
However, prudency is not up our management's street and I won't be surprised if they hand the reigns over to Afridi so that he can take the team to new lows that he didn't in his last stint.
They could bring back Imran Khan to lead the side, but it still wouldn't change a thing.POTW candidate right here, even if many don't agree with it.
[MENTION=132954]Aman[/MENTION]
Tanvir is just as good a T20 bowler, as Shehzad is a T20 batsman. To add to that Tanvir is experienced, calm and well-spoken.
Again, I don't really mind seeing anyone as our captain. But Tanvir is a very innovative wildcard option.
What was the thread creator smoking
You've got to be kidding me. Aside from games against Sri Lanka, Tanvir is a very unpredictable bowler. You never know when he'll get beaten and when he'll bowl well, even in T20s. Whereas for Shehzad, he's very consistent in ALL 3 formats.
What was the thread creator smoking
Whatever he was smoking, must be on sale cuz looks like he smoked too much of it.
It would be pathetic to give it to a senior, T20 captaincy should be given to a youngster who can take a lot away from the experience and maybe even take up the roles of ODI and Test captain later on. Giving it to a 30 odd year old who will unlikely be around in the next 2-3 years is just stupid and a waste of time which will get Pakistan cricket nowhere.Aman, our T20 team is still pretty good. Hafeez did a very decent repair job after Afridi and Misbah destroyed the team. 's leadership can be the missing link.
I beg to differ. Shehzad is very talented and a good performer for us, but he is still very inconsistent. A hundred is generally followed by a few low scores.
But this isn't really a thread about Shehzad is it? It's a thread about the benefits of appointing Tannu as the T20 captain.
It would be pathetic to give it to a senior, T20 captaincy should be given to a youngster who can take a lot away from the experience and maybe even take up the roles of ODI and Test captain later on. Giving it to a 30 odd year old who will unlikely be around in the next 2-3 years is just stupid and a waste of time which will get Pakistan cricket nowhere.
The best new ball bowler we have in T20s. Swings the ball, has a brilliant slower one and a deceptive action.
If Shehzad isn't consistent, I don't know who is.
And there are no benefits of having 'Tannu' as the T20 captani, so best to talk about others here.
Consistency is Misbah-ul-Haq. Consistency is Saeed Ajmal.
There are benefits. You just arent looking at them. You may favour Shehzad becoming the T20 captain, but Tannu has his advantages as well.
Shehzad is next in line for the most consistent player after Saeed and Misbah.
What benefits? He's calm and experienced lol?
Yes, those benefits. They matter in crunch situations.
So then make Malik/Faisal Iqbal the Test and ODI captain while you're at it.
He's actually a very good bowler, those guys are not good at what they do, respectfully.