- Joined
- Aug 12, 2023
- Runs
- 23,099
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
High Carbon steel is where its at.I personally think cast iron is the best.
Only if seasoned, otherwise about as useful as gulli Ka selected pacer likeI personally think cast iron is the best.
.png)
The problem with Pakistan is that these are the best players available in pakistan. Salman Agha was MOM in last game. He is good enough player to play in ODI for Pakistan. Pakistan players game is best suited for 240-275 type of total ..they don't have the higher celing than that. They might score some odd 300 but that won't be regular.their players are not tailor made for that . Their fast bowlers are also over rated . Shaheen is overrated imo..they need to find 1 or 2 more young quick fast bowler who have the hunger and potential to become match winner. Shaheen and Naseem are good supporting bowlers they are not outstanding bowler. Pakistan need someone who can lead this pack.
Lmao, even worse. Want to score 220?Some fans may not like to hear it but Pakistan need players like Mohammad Nawaz, Faheem Ashraf, Shadab Khan. The possibility of them even having a good outing with bat or ball is something Pakistan desperately need in white-ball. Because right now it feels like the team is being held together by cheap tape and UHU glue.
Well it's not like the batters and bowlers are any better in the one thing they are supposed to be good atLmao, even worse. Want to score 220?
Those are not proper cricketers, just quacks. Cannot bowl, cannot bat.
Honestly what a mauling. I don’t know if I should cry more about the performance or poor planning. Who bats first on a juicy pitch like this against 146kph bowlers after winning the toss knowing dew will set in.
I know. But t20 is Mickey Mouse cricket.White ball leg has been pretty even. Pakistan won the T20 series 2-1 and ODI series is at 1-1 currently.
Salman Ali Agha's knock 69 of 109 deliveries was a poor one in the end. If you play so many deliveries you need to make it count in the end which most world class players do otherwise the entire knock ends up being selfish, impactless and something which ended up hurting the team in the long run.
Maybe you weren’t watching. Burger and Bosch were pretty much unplayable. It wasn’t about scoring but survival. Once they were seen off then the spinners put on a bit of a stranglehold.Salman Ali Agha's knock 69 of 109 deliveries was a poor one in the end. If you play so many deliveries you need to make it count in the end which most world class players do otherwise the entire knock ends up being selfish, impactless and something which ended up hurting the team in the long run.
Miller, playedAfter that champion trophy happened and Pakistan knockout without winning any matches
And no Africa didn't play with full strength team in gat series as well.
![]()
![]()

Honestly, 95% of posters here act like only batters exist in cricket as if they’re the only ones who can change a game. Every time there’s a discussion in a match thread, it’s always about what the batter should’ve done differently or how they shouldn’t have gotten out. But people completely ignore the fact that bowlers often produce spells that are simply unplayable. A single good spell, sometimes just 4 to 6 overs can flip the entire game. I’ve said it many times before, but some posters stay fixated on players they dislike and refuse to give credit where it’s due. Even the best batters can look clueless when bowlers are reading them perfectly and bowling their heart out. That’s exactly what happened today, South Africa’s pacers deserve huge credit for that outstanding display early on. They completely turned the game in the first powerplay.Maybe you weren’t watching. Burger and Bosch were pretty much unplayable. It wasn’t about scoring but survival. Once they were seen off then the spinners put on a bit of a stranglehold.
But when Pak bowled dew had set on. The ball came nicely into the bat and spinners were constantly drying a wet ball.
Yet you criticise the only player that scored something
That may or may not be true. But the minute the ball gets to the outfield it’s wet. Then you’re bowling second with a wet ball which will neither swing nor seam nor spin no matter what the clay content is. Pak were constantly wiping the ball. Sure sign that something was not working.Important not to over analyse this loss. Nobody could predict that amount dew, which was absent in the first match.
Pitch curation needs to get better.
Either prepare pitches with lower clay content , which minimises the impact of dew.
Or , even on clayey pitches, make sure it is well watered and is rock hard and even team batting first can set up dew-proof totals
Yes true. To be honest it was great to see the lower order fight hard to get to 260 a couple of tweaks and this is a decent batting line up (I don’t know that we need two of Talat and faheem…I don’t know why Farhan or KG can’t be in the line up). The only reason we got to 260 is a massive captaincy error by SAF to take off their fast bowlers after 5 overs and turn to spin. Gave agha a bit of breathing space bless him.Honestly, 95% of posters here act like only batters exist in cricket as if they’re the only ones who can change a game. Every time there’s a discussion in a match thread, it’s always about what the batter should’ve done differently or how they shouldn’t have gotten out. But people completely ignore the fact that bowlers often produce spells that are simply unplayable. A single good spell, sometimes just 4 to 6 overs can flip the entire game. I’ve said it many times before, but some posters stay fixated on players they dislike and refuse to give credit where it’s due. Even the best batters can look clueless when bowlers are reading them perfectly and bowling their heart out. That’s exactly what happened today, South Africa’s pacers deserve huge credit for that outstanding display early on. They completely turned the game in the first powerplay.
He’s a very good bowler. In a couple of years he will be a superstar. Has a brain. Was setting fields constantly just lacks a bit of control which is normal for young leg spinners.South Africa’s leg-spinner Nqabayomzi Peter registered a rare ODI record with three caught and bowled dismissals against Pakistan in the second ODI here at the Iqbal Stadium on Thursday.
During his spell, the 23-year-old picked up the wickets of Hussain Talat, Mohammad Nawaz, and Shaheen Shah Afridi all caught and bowled. With this he became the first bowler in ODI history to achieve the feat in a single innings.
South Africa were probably the better side but that margin of victory was all down to the changing conditions. Bosch and Burger would've struggled bowling second too .That may or may not be true. But the minute the ball gets to the outfield it’s wet. Then you’re bowling second with a wet ball which will neither swing nor seam nor spin no matter what the clay content is. Pak were constantly wiping the ball. Sure sign that something was not working.
But this raises the next question. Dew sets in later in the night. For the first 10-15 overs when Pak were bowling there was no dew. The bowlers were bowling all over the place. This was then simply a poor bowling performance. When the batting is average you need bowlers to be exceptional. Burger and Bosch were exceptional. Shaheen and Naseem unfortunately not.
Important not to over analyse this loss. Nobody could predict that amount dew, which was absent in the first match.
Pitch curation needs to get better.
Either prepare pitches with lower clay content , which minimises the impact of dew.
Or , even on clayey pitches, make sure it is well watered and is rock hard and even team batting first can set up dew-proof totals
That was at the very end. The fast bowlers' deliveries were skidding through very easily for most of that innings.Dew didn't have that much impact. Last ball of the night was gripping and it was an edge of Saim's ball
That’s probably the understatement of the night. SAF weren’t just better they completely mauled us. In short they read the conditions better and we gifted them the game by not only batting first but also bowling poorly.South Africa were probably the better side but that margin of victory was all down to the changing conditions. Bosch and Burger would've struggled bowling second too .
Quinton and Tony were walking out of the crease and hitting on the up with impunity.
They couldn't do that against these same bowlers in the first ODI.
The clay content does matter. The ball getting wet itself is not as much an issue as the pitch absorbing moisture which high clay content pitches do .
A dry, soft pitch in the afternoon where the ball does not come on to the bat absorbs the dew and becomes harder/more compact and the ball comes on to the bat much easier, allowing aggresive strokeplay.
Agreed. But some of the problems with PAK's ODI cricket are long term issues and not specific to last nightThat’s probably the understatement of the night. SAF weren’t just better they completely mauled us. In short they read the conditions better and we gifted them the game by not only batting first but also bowling poorly.
In other words a bunch of reserves can do the basics right like bowling in the channel moving it in and out but keeping it tight at high speed and then adapt their strokeplay in foreign conditions that even the home team didn’t prepare for.
This is about lack of planning. Yes SSA is a new captain but the management sitting on the sides are clearly inept. Naseem looks rusty but burger also has been sat on the bench Looked sharp by comparison. They bought a rookie leg spinner we dropped Abrar etc etc.
The home side was completely unprepared and outplayed in every facet pretty much like the 2nd test. This isn’t a one off, a pattern is emerging. Failure to read match situations and conditions bowling as a unit setting inappropriate fields etc. It’s bigger than individual faults.
Very true I use coconut oil for seasoning.Only if seasoned, otherwise about as useful as gulli Ka selected pacer like
![]()