Indiafan
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2006
- Runs
- 19,664
- Post of the Week
- 8
How long before someone gets hurt on this pitch?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There was one spell in Australian tour when he kept troubling Hayden with the old ball, reverse swinging it. Eventually, he did claim him lbw.wanted_desi said:I know Kallis is looking like another Ponting against Sharma, maybe he has something for right handed batsman, whereas Smith is having no problems
my bad !f.b.m said:
saffer said:many not given out when s.a bowled.....keep things in perspective .
Indiafan said:Yes, Doctrove has been very consistent.
SA's can play spin , no matter wat saffer says !
saffer said:I assume you mean "Can't" . Well I think anyone would struggle on this wicket. India would have struggled too if S.a were playing someone who oculd spin the ball consistantly .Anyway....pretty much game over . I don't see the tail putting together any reasonable score .
SA have never had anyone who could spin the ball!
Isnt Botha banned from bowling his doosra after his action was questioned by a few officials ? (i am not sure about this, just questioning here - dont get all excited and shout back at me saffersaffer said:Plenty . You could take any domestic spinner from south africa and they'd spin the ball on these type of pitches . Johan botha should be here , as he spins it a lot and bowls the doosra and he can bat ....not picked for political reason .
Anyway...22 for 4 ....if they can somehow get 150 ahead there's a slight chance .....but that's not looking likely at all .
Isnt Botha banned from bowling his doosra after his action was questioned by a few officials ? (i am not sure about this, just questioning here - dont get all excited and shout back at me saffer )
Dont worry, as long as Prince stays there and ABV bats freely...we can get a 100 lead and then bowl them out for 76 again. Have faith saffer!
saffer said:ha ha ha . Even a hundred leads seem far , not that it would be enough anyway .
Perth93 said:It's Mumbai 2004 all over again.
Sehwag pulling off a Michael Clarke.
Good job, curator!![]()
Blitzkrieg said:i wonder what would happened if india would have batted first!!
Perth93 said:It's Mumbai 2004 all over again.
Sehwag pulling off a Michael Clarke.
Good job, curator!![]()
Exactly. Its just like Perth where Sehwag picked up 2 wickets.Perth93 said:It's Mumbai 2004 all over again.
Sehwag pulling off a Michael Clarke.
Good job, curator!![]()
jusarrived said:this is how sub continenetal picth shud be .....before mouthing off just check the score card ....both teams have scored 250+ in the first innings & the number of wickets pace bowlers have taken !
Perth93 said:A wicket where a daisy like Bhajji takes wickets cant be a serious cricket pitch, dude.![]()
Still counts as a 'win', nevertheless. Ganguly deserves the man of the match.
Come on, be serious. There were 3 matches and one wicket turned. And it wasnt as if it was a dead one for fast bowlers either to put SA out of the equation. SA won the toss and had the initial advantage so the wicket wasnt "doctored" to suit a particular team.Perth93 said:A wicket where a daisy like Bhajji takes wickets cant be a serious cricket pitch, dude.![]()
Still counts as a 'win', nevertheless. Ganguly deserves the man of the match.
Perth93 said:A wicket where a daisy like Bhajji takes wickets cant be a serious cricket pitch, dude.
OZGOD said:This last wicket partnership could be a gamewinner for the Indians. SA need at least 150 runs to defend and I think they will do it tough to get to 210.