Hasan123
Test Star
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Runs
- 38,432
Ratings are not the be and end all in this era when it comes to reflection of the TV product when the WWE is consumed in so many different ways and then there's streams to. Punk was doing a really good job as champ, if he wasn't Vince wouldn't have hesitated to take the belt of him. I recall Punk being advertised for House Shows and when he was pulled from those events WWE would offer all their customers a refund. On top of that he was also amongst the best merch sellers, second only to Cena and at times he also out sold him. He has a cult following and is incredibly popular, The Rock's run at the top wasn't long either but he had the benefit of starting his career out during the pro-wrestling boom when the likes of WCW, WWF and ECW were all a part of pop culture in those days. Bret Hart the greatest technician of all time and he rated Punk's in ring work as being unique and innovative, I also feel the same way as he got even better in the WWE once he had left the indy's.
His attitude allowed him to become a main-event level superstar in the WWE, were it not for that attitude he'd have remained in the upper-mid card for the rest of his career because certain folk did their utmost to bury his career. People pay most attention to Punk the anti-corporate rebel but his run as the straight edge messiah was arguably the greatest heel gimmick of the PG era, it was absolutely stellar and am sure he received awards from the Wrestling Observer and PWI. I think he did all there was to do in the WWE, perhaps he could have been involved in a couple more main-event level programs or main-evented a mania but I can't think of anything he hasn't done to not warrant ATG status imo.
As champion rating are important. I can remember Chavo guerro saying when Eddie was champuion he would always look at the ratings and would get upset if they weren't higher each time. Chavo thinks that's why Eddie didn't last long as champion. They aren't the be all and end all but they are important. Wwe booking didn't help punk tbf, no way should he have lost to triple h in 2011. Yes I have said punk was a great worker I'm sure others felt the same.
I don't think he spent enough years at the top level to be considered atg of wrestling. If he was still at the top now than yes he would be. His attitude did help but the way he left wwe seems a bit of an attitude problem but than again if more wrestlers did that now we wouldn't get such boring promos. You can tell punks promos are from his heart