I can’t see the negatives outweighing the positives at all, this is a guy who took wrestling main stream, gave us the AE & RA eras, especially the latter for me, put on some of the greatest events of all time and created unforgettable characters. If there’s stuff to criticise then it’s mainly his booking choices after the steroid scandal while WCW were starting to get ahead, I know it was only 82 or 83 weeks but Eric is the only promoter who gave Vince a bloody nose, ultimately though Vince found a way to adapt, then you can criticise for the policy’s and this is all promoters, which unfortunately played a small part in what Benoit would do which lead to a dead product; but Vince revived it by giving Punk a shot at the big leagues, and H attempted to sabotage that, be glad Punk had an historic run because people still recall that, if it was indeed up to H he’d have been jobbed into space, you see how he dealt with him at the height of the summer of Punk, so Punk was booked as well as he possibly could have been with H continuously trying to meddle in booking affairs, though the lead up to WM 29 was a very low point for my own viewership. I agree that Vince needs to take some responsibility for the reign of terror, but when you look at the history of wrestling and family nepotism; I’ve never seen anyone use their influence so negatively like H to the detriment of the business, this is a guy who sold the soul of professional wrestling to the devil.
Punk himself will admit that WM 28/29 were his moments, he didn’t begrudge Bryan getting the main event because WM 30 was his time, and they wanted to throw him another bone like they did the year before but Punk did not see H on the same level of a Taker and rightly so. Any other year, you could have made something of a feud between Punk & H providing the latter was going to put him over, but not main eventing for three straight manias had to hurt, and even more when you get asked to work with a guy who played a big hand in making sure Punk did not get the main event spotlight. There are ways in which I think Punk could still have been in the WM 30 main event and I have an interesting idea on that but that was the year H needed someone to work with to and there was no chance in hell anything else was going to happen.
I see most will see R-Truth as a comedy guy but to me he was still Ron Killings the first African American to win the NWA worlds championship, see it more in the vein of say a Polkadot Dusty Rhodes challenging for the world championship. If there’s an R-Truth criticism it could be they didn’t explore his NWA wildside character a but more, other then that he was treated well, and so was Kofi, I genuinely thought he would drop the belt in the show I attended after Mani in Brooklyn, or within a few weeks, he had a solid run; say what you want but Vince is well ahead of most when it comes to knowing how a top level star needs to be booked and Brock crushing Kofi was the right decision, much like how I would expect Gunther to treat Pat, this is how you elevate a top level star and you can use them down the line to create more main eventers, what would be achieved if Kofi went 50/50 with Brock, we got a headline, Brock looked like the beast he should and Kofi can come back again, and he clearly did until H stole his New Day Ticket money that racist piece of crap. We got Mark Henry as champ, King Booker, Lashley et al Vince was pro diversity long before it became a thing in the work place.
Oh and he made Jinder champion! who gives chances like this! the first south asian champion, honestly, you can question how he randomly got the shot (mainly so he could put 4/10 over in India), but Jinder was in shape, a solid gimmick and he had a decent run, in-fact his entire reign was more memorable then any of H’s title reigns tbh and he had some great matches on PPV with the likes Randy and AJ, it lead to a special title change in the UK, I will forever regret not being able to make that show due to a couple of people letting me down, the roster backstage was full of praise for Jinder to in how he carried himself.
I think Vince can easily be criticised but the highs and lows should be rated overall proportional to how long he was a promoter and he was on top for a very long time, he has a long list of poor decisions but a lot more good ones, otherwise the business doesn’t survive either or get to a point where it built a resilient structure. And he had a knack for doing something mind boggling, but on the flip side he had great instincts, created great characters and moments which made you suspend your disbelief and that’s missing, the big events are no longer a spectacle and creatively, WWE is interesting due to its big names and their influence, H has been a very mediocre and predictable booker beyond that, he criticises his fans and under this new regime the normal people who support the business are not treated well, Vince never put prices up like this and heck he always kept the Network at 9.99 in the UK! I am missing the Network already.
However, I accept that fans became jaded at times with his creative and wanted something different (AEW) or (H), it’s just that both have not done that great either after the honeymoon period, I expected that, and I think people genuinely wanted a lot more and they need to keep that in mind and attack H especially a lot more.