Nikhil_cric
ODI Star
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2011
- Runs
- 33,658
Away as well. Not just homeYep, england got away with a lot of things at home
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Away as well. Not just homeYep, england got away with a lot of things at home
Look at Wasim Akram, well respected in every circleTo be honest, I never expect Fakhar to do this. He seems like a gentleman.
Look at Wasim Akram, well respected in every circle
Rauf: Bro, there is a thread about me being an unreliable death bowler on Pakpassion, I need you to work your magicI am guessing Fakhar was asked to do this by someone else (if the allegation is true).
I can't picture Fakhar doing this on his own.
Peer pressure.
Remember the great Imran khan was doing it in some useless county match and he wrote about it. That is main reason I don’t believe much about Pakistan’s legacy in bowling. Fact that suddenly their bowling plummeted right after introduction of multiple camera angle and more scrutiny tell you everything you need to know
And now we should accept it. That is what I told your buddy @RedwoodOriginalOfficial verdict is out in the open.
Stay out of it and worry about east and tamuls and your country.What has pashtun got to do with anything?
You accepting or not accepting it doesn't make a lick of difference. Anyone with a working brain accepted it the moment the umpires reported it and we saw the picture of the ball. You constantly telling us to accept it is just you projecting what you should have done from the start, so stop tagging me.And now we should accept it. That is what I told your buddy @RedwoodOriginal
This will be interesting. He rightly used his appeal, and now further investigation would get done.
The last Pakistani fast bowler to take 200 test wickets was waqar Younis and he retired in 2003
Because he is Premium PHAAAAAAST bowler and aaqib's buddy...Why no action against Shaheen? The guy so incompetent and toxic.
Sachin was cleared by ICC of ball tampering so why is his name there? And I believe Dravid was charged with tampering once
Yeah Tendulkar was cleared. There should be an asterisk next to his name like there is with Pakistan team/Inzamam, Oval 2006.Sachin was cleared by ICC of ball tampering so why is his name there? And I believe Dravid was charged with tampering once
Honestly speaking, I was expecting Fakhar Zaman to do something like this. No wonder, he denied it.
The right way is to wait for evidence; that is intelligence. Otherwise you are just like sheep.You accepting or not accepting it doesn't make a lick of difference. Anyone with a working brain accepted it the moment the umpires reported it and we saw the picture of the ball. You constantly telling us to accept it is just you projecting what you should have done from the start, so stop tagging me.
He should question Shaheen and Lahore's management about why he was left high and dry after that incident.He said he might retire from international cricket after this
Well evidence was against him and not othersHe should question Shaheen and Lahore's management about why he was left high and dry after that incident.
Honestly ban him for even longer in this PSL.Source: HBL PSL Official Release – 02 April 2026
Fakhar Zaman appealed the two-match suspension given by Match Referee Roshan Mahanama for breaching Article 2.14 (changing the condition of the ball) during Lahore Qalandars vs Karachi Kings on 29 March.
The PSL Technical Committee (Prof. Javed Malik, Dr Mumraiz Naqshband, Mr Syed Ali Naqi) heard the appeal today. After a de novo inquiry (fresh review of all evidence) and hearing submissions, the Committee has dismissed the appeal and upheld the two-match ban.
Key notes from the release:
Full press release text:
- Article 2.14 relates to changing ball condition (breach of clause 41.3 of HBL PSL Playing Conditions)
- First Level 3 offence carries minimum 1 match ban, maximum 2 match ban (maximum was applied)
- The Technical Committee’s decision is final, binding, and cannot be appealed further
PSL Technical Committee upholds Fakhar Zaman sanction
Lahore, 02 April 2026:
Fakhar Zaman appealed the decision of the Match Referee to suspend him for two HBL PSL matches for breaching Article 2.14 of the applicable Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel during the Lahore Qalandars v Karachi Kings match on Sunday, 29 March at the Gaddafi Stadium, Lahore.
The appeal was heard today by the PSL Technical Committee comprising Professor Javed Malik, Dr Mumraiz Naqshband, and Mr Syed Ali Naqi. Pursuant to conducting a de novo inquiry, reviewing all evidence, and hearing submissions from relevant individuals, the Committee has dismissed the appeal and upheld the two-match ban imposed by Match Referee Roshan Mahanama.
NOTES:
• Article 2.14 relates to, “Changing the condition of the ball in breach of clause 41.3 of the HBL PSL Playing Conditions”.
• Commission of a Level 3 offence for the first time carries a minimum penalty of one match ban and a maximum penalty of two match ban.
• In accordance with the Code of Conduct, any decision made by the PSL Technical Committee shall be the full, final, and complete disposition of the matter and will be binding on all parties.
-ENDS-
What do you think? Was the two-match ban fair? Should Fakhar have been given a lesser penalty? Discuss below.

Seems to be some Indian media news....I hope you understand now whether it's true or falseFakhar Zaman ban by Pakistan Cricket for ball-tampering during PSL match.
Now, Fakhar Zaman Fakhar Zaman appointment temporary head coach of Lahor Qalandars. Is this true or just another social media banter @The Bald Eagle
![]()
![]()
Acha ji ..Seems to be some Indian media news....I hope you understand now whether it's true or false![]()

Still Indian news, this journalist had that traits
Source is Pakistani but year let's blame on India. ..Still Indian news, this journalist had that traits
