I find it really funny that posters who have never seen a women in their life would like to comment that you how marriage tends to work. This is a cricket forum, and I dont think that such ** argument make sense over here.
I am happily married, and my relationship is not about give and take and compromise and all that baloney. Sure, when it comes to everyday life and minor issues, you need to adjust such as the time you wake up, the time you go to bed, your daily routine etc.
However, when it comes to major decisions such as where to live, where to invest, where the kids will go to school in the future etc. I have and will have the final say. This is not about dominance, this is about having discipline and balance. You always need an authority figure.
This doesn’t mean you have to tyrannical. You will have discussions and consider all options, but the final call will be your decision.
This is not about education either. My wife is educated but she is comfortable with this arrangement because she also grew up in a household where her father was also the authoritative figure. Same goes for thousands and thousands of subcontinent households because it is patriarchal society.
Patriarchy does not mean misogyny. That is a misconception.
There also thousands of women who are dominating, and they are usually dominating because their mothers were dominant over their subservient fathers. These types of dominant women are only compatible with subservient husbands. When both partners are dominant, the marriage is not compatible, and hence it is not about give and take and compromise.
In Kohli’s case, it appears that Anushka is the dominant partner. First, he had him leave his home in Delhi and relocate to Mumbai because of Bollywood, then she made him leave his team hanging in a hugely important series. I am pretty she will have the final say in naming the child and she will also decide when he retires from cricket and how he divides his time between national duty and family life.
If Kohli is happy and he seems very happy, good for him. However, people should not shy away from calling it what it is.