MR__KHAN__JI
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- Runs
- 14,761
- Post of the Week
- 1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Even the great sachin tendulkar averages 32...
Ye dekho
![]()
I know....
I have high expectations of Kohli.
He is the sort of cricketer I like.
Good stats... but playing SL it might as well be a "home game"
Best subcontinental batsmen since 2000 averages a meek 30 odd in test cricket...![]()
Time to check great Inzi's test numbers in Australia and South Afriica.
A good batsman, but let's not get carried away. Is yet to play that defining Test innings. In fact, he's yet to play an innings of the quality of Umar Akmal's debut ton. Until then, the jury is out.
Excellent ODI batsman, though.
NAhh dont think Kholi is a better bat than Sangakarra...
sangaa is the best since 2000 but kohli is the best talent since 2007 onwards,
Post 2000? has to be Sanga.
Way to not read the OP guys. He asked since Sanga's debut.
and yet some Pakistani fans are against Umar Akmal and Ahmed Shehzad and would drop them instead of YK and Misbah.Don't know about talent, but Virat has the best temperament. I think, from PAK Umar & Shehzad can match him stroke by stroke, but Virat is groomed by a great batting coach at NCA Bangalore (notoriously tough for his unmindful students, believing in make or break, no half measures) in his early teens & has developed into very good batting habits, like conversion of starts & make the fielding side get you out. On contrary, Umar is trained by novices who think, either you drop youngsters to learn from club level domestic games or put him in pads isolated at a corner so that they don't repeat the same mistake.
Then comes the mentor, SRT/Rahul vs..........
Umar & Shehzad are lucky than Nazir that, at least, better late than never, they have got someone as batting coach, who knows a few things more than arranging nets. I told it early several times & stick to that, if anyone breaks SRT's ODI hundred record, first person 'll be Virat. I am a fan of the boy & like his attitude. He 'll be a tremendous Captain.
Dinesh Karthik and Fawad Alam![]()
Since 2000 and records UNDER THE AGE OF 25.... in the toughest locations excluding drawn matches.
View attachment 24529
View attachment 24530
Michael Hussey says "hello!" and is good in all three formats.
Virat Kohli is talented, too!
This shows matches in which Bond was playing. Not their stats against him.
^^^^ For all your cricinfo analysis (though pretty useful) it's amazing you left out West Indies.
Pre-2000, West Indies was one the toughest place to score runs in Tests.
And West Indies should should still be in the ODI camparisons, as it's still a tough place to score runs in West Indies, especially with their slow and sticky wickets. You won't find many 300 plus scores in West Indies.
Gotta say very disrespectful not to include West Indies, as it's probably tougher in West Indies than New Zealand.
West Indies pitches are not the same as sub-continent pitches, and some of their pitches like in Barbados are very bouncy and maintain good pace.
maybe but he still has one of those faces that I want to punch
maybe but he still has one of those faces that I want to punch
Michael Hussey says "hello!" and is good in all three formats.
Virat Kohli is talented, too!
Yaaas, let's call CSK player to be Subbie.:Srinivasan
Since 2000 and records UNDER THE AGE OF 25.... in the toughest locations excluding drawn matches.
View attachment 24529
View attachment 24530
This is actually nitpicking.
To prove, in these "toughest" conditions you have just mentioned one of the all time ODI greats Saeed Anwar averaged a measly 21.24 with a highest of 77 over 43 matches.
lol anyone saying Kohli is not a force in ODIs and better than U Akmal (even talent wise) is delusional. Said that... he has yet to prove himself in Tests!
Its a fact. Not nitpicking.
It actually shows you that people improve as they gain experience.
Why we should be applauding the success that Umar Akmal has had so far at the age of 21.
After following Rohit and Kohli ( from IPL days onwards ) , i use to think Rohit is the most talented out of all young players,
but end result is totally different now , kohli is well established and i dont know where rohit will end up.
Sometime talent alone wont work , and its the same case with akmal too , from whatever i had seen he plays far too many shots even in the middle overs ( barring one last game )..
probably i think akmal is taking his place for granted
I totally agree that talent alone means nothing...
Talented players come and go...
However when you find real talent it is a waste if it goes unfulfilled.
Especially when a country doesn't have many talented batsmen.
What does "taking place for granted mean"?
It's hard work improving as a batsmen, made harder in an unstable environment.
He needs to improve in the side.
Kohli was not an automatic selection in ODIs even in the world cup odi team,
so he was desperate to perform to retain his place in the team..
but akmal was an automatic choice in both ODIs as well as in tests and probably he might have taken his place in the team without any competition ..
i am not sure how far the news is true about umar akmal refusing to play in case kamran was not picked ,
but if that is true he needs to change his mentality
Like I said. Kohli has been managed well and has played 80% of games in easy conditions batting in a sensible position.
That has had more impact than anything else.
I agree that kohli has shown better temperament than Akmal so far.
Easy conditions or not, Umar Akmal shows no hint of setting up shop at the crease for the long haul.
Forget Kohli, it's the success of Chandimal in tough conditions in England, South Africa, and Australia that has been impressive. A very limited player but know his game and gets maximum out of it.
Despite Akmal's shortcoming in temperament, he is still got an impressive average and strike rate playing at no. 6! and remember he is still only 21.
I still rate Akmal ahead of Kohli and Chandimal, but Kohli and Chandimal have raced ahead in terms of deliverance. Akmal needs to find his niche in the team (not number 6, wasted there despite his success).
I would seriously open with Akmal.
Like I said. Kohli has been managed well and has played 80% of games in easy conditions batting in a sensible position.
That has had more impact than anything else.
I agree that kohli has shown better temperament than Akmal so far.
well kohli is in the form of his life right now. but there will be a phase when he will flop. wont be able to score a run. wait for the vultures then. so many smartasses here kick the dog when its down.
i for one hope kohli maintains his scoring and gets support from youngsters like rohit sharma, suresh raina(baring his technically shortcomings, mentally and attitudewise one of the best cricketer india has) and rahane.
Kohli made his debut in SL in 2008 as an opener in the 'Mendis' series (India were depleted in Batting), Gambhir got injured after that match, Kohli did very well against Kulasekara and Vaas against the moving ball in low scoring games.
SRT,Sehwag and Gambhir have missed more than half of the Odi matches India played, Parthiv Patel failed replacing them, Kohli hasn't had it 'easy' , touring all countries except NZ, how did you get '80%' and 'Easy' I don't know.
Chandimal in Asia avg. 13.5
Not a good player of spin?
Glad to see Gollum in PP btw, you didn't show up when Gandalf was active?![]()