What are the top strategies PCB can consider for hosting Champions Trophy 2025 after India’s refusal to visit Pakistan?

What are the strategies PCB can consider for hosting CT 2025 after India refusal to visit Pakiistan


  • Total voters
    45
Waiting for your reason.. meanwhile everyone is relaxed bunch if indians running back and forth like clowns

Pakistanis are running back and forth.

Indians know that CT will be played with India playing it games away from Pakistan.
 
New movie coming produced by karan johar the plot is

The evil PCB refused to travel to India to play some hero cup, BBCI worked hard for 30 years got financially strongly and took its revenge in an ICC tournament. 😁
 
New movie coming produced by karan johar the plot is

The evil PCB refused to travel to India to play some hero cup, BBCI worked hard for 30 years got financially strongly and took its revenge in an ICC tournament. 😁

You guys are hung on Bollywood. Poor you.
 
I don't see pakistanis going on various forums and crying about it. It's only the indian 😭😭😭

Who is crying? BCCI said we won't go to Pakistan. Now every one is trying to find a solution to India's problem and pakistanis are issuing empty threats.
 
We don't even want to go to Pakistan.
OK just be quiet and sit down then I don't see pakistani talking about it only few indian clowns jumping up and down. If you didn't care you wouldn't be posting in this thread

You have the most posts on this topic and then you make it out you don't care 🤣
 
OK just be quiet and sit down then I don't see pakistani talking about it only few indian clowns jumping up and down. If you didn't care you wouldn't be posting in this thread

You have the most posts on this topic and then you make it out you don't care 🤣

No Indian opened this thread.

Indians are mostly replying to points made against India.
 
i Think PcB should play smart and try not to loose hosting rights by having a rigid stance like saying no to hybrid option. its not in PcB interest and frankly they cant enforce their will on ICC which is predominantly pro BCCI regardless of right or wrong
1. PCB should agree to host trophy with hybrid model
2. Push ICC to change group so Pakistan does nt have to play India , Because that would mean Pakistan traveling to accommodate as host nation. Its unlikely that ICC will agree to it
3. Agree With Hybrid Model and keep same group. but when time comes , forfeit India game and refuse to travel. in That case Pakistan will only loose 2 points but they get to host trophy and keep their pride. it will be big embarrassment for ICC without attracting any adverse action from ICC in middle of tournament. If india and Pakistan reach final which is unlikely , Pakistan Should forfeit that too and embarrass ICC further without any adverse action. Teams have forfeit matches in Past.
 
3. Agree With Hybrid Model and keep same group. but when time comes , forfeit India game and refuse to travel. in That case Pakistan will only loose 2 points but they get to host trophy and keep their pride. it will be big embarrassment for ICC without attracting any adverse action from ICC in middle of tournament. If india and Pakistan reach final which is unlikely , Pakistan Should forfeit that too and embarrass ICC further without any adverse action. Teams have forfeit matches in Past.
What will be Pakistan reason to forfeit the game against India in UAE?
 
What will be Pakistan reason to forfeit the game against India in UAE?
Because Pakistanis dnt want to see India Pakistan play at neutral venue either because India does Not want to travel to Pakistan. why play at all? Indians also dnt want it. why ICC forces this down on fans of both countries?
 
Because Pakistanis dnt want to see India Pakistan play at neutral venue either because India does Not want to travel to Pakistan. why play at all? Indians also dnt want it. why ICC forces this down on fans of both countries?
That's not good enough reason , pakistan will need very strong reasons otherwise ICC will impose penalty on PCB

In fast whenever any team forfeit the matches they were given strong reason .

Like Australia & westindies were forfeit due to security reasons and which was justified

England was forfeited the match due to political reasons and was justified .

But what are the Pakistan reason? Pakistan can't simply say that se doesn't want to play against India at neutral venues.

This is not in ICC rulebook and they never accept this reason.

So any other solid reasons?
 
as far official reason , PCB can hide behind Government instructions same as BCCI. Force Majeour
Thats where pakistan fans don't know the rules, instead talking emotional. I was expecting the same answer this is why i asked you .

Pakistan is playing the match against india IN UAE

Force majeour means security and political relations are the reason but pakistan Political Relation with UAE is very good .

And security is not a issue in UAE ,if pakistan tell ICC we have security issues than UAE shek will take off the pants of PCB official.

:kp
 
That's not good enough reason , pakistan will need very strong reasons otherwise ICC will impose penalty on PCB

In fast whenever any team forfeit the matches they were given strong reason .

Like Australia & westindies were forfeit due to security reasons and which was justified

England was forfeited the match due to political reasons and was justified .

But what are the Pakistan reason? Pakistan can't simply say that se doesn't want to play against India at neutral venues.

This is not in ICC rulebook and they never accept this reason.

So any other solid reasons?
what are you talking about? There are plenty of Justifications. foremost being BCCI refused to travel on behest of their Government and so far no reason has been given. so how can you say its security? let that reason come to fore.
Pakistan can say their Government has instructed to cut cricketing ties with India unless India agrees to travel to Pakistan.
There was no penalty when Aus forfeit to play in Lanka 1996
England forfeit in 2003
Icc did nt impose any penalty on either teams accept the penalty of loosing two points

what penalty do you think icc can impose on Pakistan when Pakistan forfeit just one game? None except stripping us of 2 points. and Pakistan are not hosting any tournament in future anyway
 
Thats where pakistan fans don't know the rules, instead talking emotional. I was expecting the same answer this is why i asked you .

Pakistan is playing the match against india IN UAE

Force majeour means security and political relations are the reason but pakistan Political Relation with UAE is very good .

And security is not a issue in UAE ,if pakistan tell ICC we have security issues than UAE shek will take off the pants of PCB official.

:kp
UAE has nothing to do with it. Pakistan Government can Instruct PCB to cut cricketing ties with India. why would UAE officials make any issue about it?
 
what are you talking about? There are plenty of Justifications. foremost being BCCI refused to travel on behest of their Government and so far no reason has been given. so how can you say its security? let that reason come to fore.
Pakistan can say their Government has instructed to cut cricketing ties with India unless India agrees to travel to Pakistan.
There was no penalty when Aus forfeit to play in Lanka 1996
England forfeit in 2003
Icc did nt impose any penalty on either teams accept the penalty of loosing two points

what penalty do you think icc can impose on Pakistan when Pakistan forfeit just one game? None except stripping us of 2 points. and Pakistan are not hosting any tournament in future anyway
I already said that Pakistan need strong reason and Australia forfeit because security issue was real those days in lanka .

You're not making sense .
 
We are talking if Pakistan accept the hybrid models .read the whole situation .

This reason is not valid if match is scheduled in UAE .
we are at a point where validity of reasons dnt matter anymore.

ICC will impose penalty like what?
 
UAE has nothing to do with it. Pakistan Government can Instruct PCB to cut cricketing ties with India. why would UAE officials make any issue about it?
Pakistan agree with Hybrid model means UAE has everything to do with.

Match is not happening in india / Pakistan so both countries political reasons will not acceptable .

Read the rules again.
 
We are talking if Pakistan accept the hybrid models .read the whole situation .

This reason is not valid if match is scheduled in UAE .


There is no logical reason why India shouldn't come to Pakistan when 6 other teams are okay to be in Pakistan.

If ICC opts for a hybrid model, Pakistan should forfeit India game to send a message.
 
I have read the whole situation.

If ICC opts for a hybrid model, Pakistan should forfeit India game to send a message.

There is no logical reason why India shouldn't come to Pakistan when 6 other teams are okay to be in Pakistan.
Pakistan can forfiet any matches at anywhere if they can give valid reason to ICC.

If not then they will face the senction/ Penalty .

Pakistan can't forfiet any matches without any valid reason. Read the rules .

Lol
 
Forfeit the match then you would know how they will faced the penalty.
you seem to know that already. you can give an example of penalty? lol you are being emotional.. you should be happy that there will be no India Pak Game. Embarrassment will be for ICC. Indians will be getting 2 free points or may even end up winning the trophy without playing final 😂 that would be fun
 
Pakistan can forfiet any matches at anywhere if they can give valid reason to ICC.

If not then they will face the senction/ Penalty .

Pakistan can't forfiet any matches without any valid reason. Read the rules .

Lol

Sanction?

There is no sanction for forfeiting games.

NZ forfeited Kenya game in 2003 WC.
England forfeited Zimbabwe game in 2003 WC.
Australia forfeited SL game in 1996 WC.

Forfeiture doesn't result in sanction.
 
you seem to know that already. you can give an example of penalty? lol you are being emotional.. you should be happy that there will be no India Pak Game. Embarrassment will be for ICC. Indians will be getting 2 free points or may even end up winning the trophy without playing final 😂 that would be fun
Yes I know the rules that's why i ask the question .

Pakistan already has the signed the agreement with ICC and broadcasters, etc. They can't forfiet sny match without valid reason.
 
I think Pakistan should look at it from and economic viewpoint rather than getting emotional and accept the hybrid model. They really don't have any leverage in this situation so its better to take the money and play it in Pak and have 5 games in the UAE including final. The only possible thing they may be able to do is get more money in terms of compensation but that is the most they can do.

There is no point getting emotional and try to go war with the ICC or BCCI because they will never win. Even the broadcaster is an Indian company so threatening to not play India in the next few tournaments won't really work either. They are better off taking the money and use it to improve the infrastructure, that is the best long term solution.
 
Yes I know the rules that's why i ask the question .

Pakistan already has the signed the agreement with ICC and broadcasters, etc. They can't forfiet sny match without valid reason.
and what are consequences? thats not in agreement?
 
Sanction?

There is no sanction for forfeiting games.

NZ forfeited Kenya game in 2003 WC.
England forfeited Zimbabwe game in 2003 WC.
Australia forfeited SL game in 1996 WC.

Forfeiture doesn't result in sanction.
Pakistan is hosting this event so they had signed the extra agreement with ICC and broadcasters .

Man you don't know anything about rule .
 
Then you first need to read the revenue distribution model of ICC.

there is no agreement between Broadcasters and PCB on anything..that is between icc and broadcasters. so no clause of penalty can come into play
Maximum ICC can do is reduce Pakistan share from Distribution model. but that will happen for every other board since no revenue was collected because of no Indo Pak game.

its not the concern of PCB only to protect the interests of Broadcasters. Its the Job of ICC.
 
as far official reason , PCB can hide behind Government instructions same as BCCI. Force Majeour

Next time ICC will demand that PCB guarantee in writing from their government their team's participation in all scheduled matches. Failing which ICC will replace Pakistan.

ICC will also deduct money from PCB for failing to show up for scheduled matches.

PCB has signed an agreement to host and participate in the matches. If there is a force majeure PCB can inform the ICC now.

PCB isn't a strong board in the ICC.
 
there is no agreement between Broadcasters and PCB on anything..that is between icc and broadcasters. so no clause of penalty can come into play
Maximum ICC can do is reduce Pakistan share from Distribution model. but that will happen for every other board since no revenue was collected because of no Indo Pak game.

its not the concern of PCB only to protect the interests of Broadcasters. Its the Job of ICC.


PCB is getting any money from ICC because they agreed to play matches. If they don't play matches they won't get paid. They may be replaced as well.
 
In a normal world, people don’t make a fuss over a tournament they turned down themselves.

India’s just looking for attention here. Saying, "Let us play somewhere else, or we’re not sharing the money"

just comes off as desperate from their side.
BCCI just stated that they can't play in Pakistan due to non clearence from GOI.

Let us play somewhere or not sharing money..... In these subjects, BCCI hasn't made any comment. This is speculation and projection of you and other ppers and not reality.

If you beg to differ, then can you quote where BCCI made statements of sharing revenue?
 
PCB is getting any money from ICC because they agreed to play matches. If they don't play matches they won't get paid. They may be replaced as well.
do you see the fallacy of this argument?
you are talking about matches.. we are talking about just one game. ind vs Pak .. surely pcb will be aware that forfeiture would mean loss of income. part of it.. not all. but that will happen for other boards. how much Disney Star expect to earn from indo Pak games out of 3 Billion they paid to ICC? i would guess it to be around 30% .. thats gonna be a big loss for icc not just pcb.

so if Pak refuses to play India , ICC stands to loose because of that. so they will replace us? lol replace us for what? forfeiture does nt attract any such penalty. thats what you think or its written somewhere?
 
Next time ICC will demand that PCB guarantee in writing from their government their team's participation in all scheduled matches. Failing which ICC will replace Pakistan.

ICC will also deduct money from PCB for failing to show up for scheduled matches.

PCB has signed an agreement to host and participate in the matches. If there is a force majeure PCB can inform the ICC now.

PCB isn't a strong board in the ICC.

But then ICC can also demand that BCCI also guarantee in writing from their govt their team's participation in all scheduled matches. Failing which ICC will replace India.
 
Next time ICC will demand that PCB guarantee in writing from their government their team's participation in all scheduled matches. Failing which ICC will replace Pakistan.

ICC will also deduct money from PCB for failing to show up for scheduled matches.

PCB has signed an agreement to host and participate in the matches. If there is a force majeure PCB can inform the ICC now.

PCB isn't a strong board in the ICC.
Icc will demand? they told you that? did nt pcb also demand that last year when agreeing to visit India for cwc 2023 and India Guarantees its visit to Pak for CT? did they get that gurantee?
why are you giving scenarios that require PcB to do everything to ensure ICC’s interests but same things dnt apply to BCCI?
BCCI is strong board so that means rules dnt apply to them? is that what you mean here?
 
BCCI just stated that they can't play in Pakistan due to non clearence from GOI.
Yes absolutely fine
Let us play somewhere or not sharing money..... In these subjects, BCCI hasn't made any comment. This is speculation and projection of you and other ppers and not reality.

If you beg to differ, then can you quote where BCCI made statements of sharing revenue?
Bcci spokesmen like you and the rest of you of clowns jumping up and down about it for few days now

Why not just shut up and sit down untill something official from ICC PCB and BCCI
 
PCB is getting any money from ICC because they agreed to play matches. If they don't play matches they won't get paid. They may be replaced as well.
money is out of question when there is none to give once indo pak game does nt happen. if pcb decides that , loosing money will be part of it. its a consequence that pcb will be willing to accept if they take that route
no such rules in icc to replace a team because of one match forfeiture
 
Yes absolutely fine

Bcci spokesmen like you and the rest of you of clowns jumping up and down about it for few days now

Why not just shut up and sit down untill something official from ICC PCB and BCCI
So you don't have any source to backup your claim?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Next time ICC will demand that PCB guarantee in writing from their government their team's participation in all scheduled matches. Failing which ICC will replace Pakistan.

ICC will also deduct money from PCB for failing to show up for scheduled matches.

PCB has signed an agreement to host and participate in the matches. If there is a force majeure PCB can inform the ICC now.

PCB isn't a strong board in the ICC.

Try replacing PCB with BCCi and Pakistan with India in your paragraph above and you’ll see the farcical situation we are in today..

Anyway ICC cannot force anyone to play all their games in ICC tournaments.. it certainly did not occur in the 2003 WC when multiple countries refused to play against Zimbabwe nor Kenya

Neither do ICC have the authority to kick anyone out unless they refuse to participate in the tournament altogether..
 
money is out of question when there is none to give once indo pak game does nt happen. if pcb decides that , loosing money will be part of it. its a consequence that pcb will be willing to accept if they take that route
no such rules in icc to replace a team because of one match forfeiture

It is your
money is out of question when there is none to give once indo pak game does nt happen. if pcb decides that , loosing money will be part of it. its a consequence that pcb will be willing to accept if they take that route
no such rules in icc to replace a team because of one match forfeiture

You are mistaken if you think Indian market won't watch the match if Pakistan is absent. As long as indians watch money will come.

No such allowance to teams to skip matches whenever they want. There is something called the MPA.
 
Try replacing PCB with BCCi and Pakistan with India in your paragraph above and you’ll see the farcical situation we are in today..

Anyway ICC cannot force anyone to play all their games in ICC tournaments.. it certainly did not occur in the 2003 WC when multiple countries refused to play against Zimbabwe nor Kenya

Neither do ICC have the authority to kick anyone out unless they refuse to participate in the tournament altogether..

BCCI hasn't signed the MPA. They are stalling it since 2022.

If India participates in the tournament, they will play all scheduled matches.

If India doesn't play, they will not get their share of ICC money.

BCCI has a reserve of $2.5bn USD and earns 100s of millions from IPL and home series. They can afford to lose some of their ICC revenue.

Can PCB?
 
do you see the fallacy of this argument?
you are talking about matches.. we are talking about just one game. ind vs Pak .. surely pcb will be aware that forfeiture would mean loss of income. part of it.. not all. but that will happen for other boards. how much Disney Star expect to earn from indo Pak games out of 3 Billion they paid to ICC? i would guess it to be around 30% .. thats gonna be a big loss for icc not just pcb.

so if Pak refuses to play India , ICC stands to loose because of that. so they will replace us? lol replace us for what? forfeiture does nt attract any such penalty. thats what you think or its written somewhere?

Your guess isn't going to make it the truth.

Let's assume ICC lose X amount because of no Indo Pak game because of forfeiture.

Now ICC replaces Pakistan with SL. And its now a India vs SL match.They don't get X but may be get half of X. Their losses are reduced by half.

The more matches India plays more is the money. So rather than having no match due to the forfeiture, ICC can actually have a India vs another team match and make money.

That's why if Pakistan threatens to forfeit, ICC may replace them.
 
Icc will demand? they told you that? did nt pcb also demand that last year when agreeing to visit India for cwc 2023 and India Guarantees its visit to Pak for CT? did they get that gurantee?
why are you giving scenarios that require PcB to do everything to ensure ICC’s interests but same things dnt apply to BCCI?
BCCI is strong board so that means rules dnt apply to them? is that what you mean here?

This is BCCI. Not PCB.

When you bring 90 per cent of the revenues, you are irreplaceable.
 
But then ICC can also demand that BCCI also guarantee in writing from their govt their team's participation in all scheduled matches. Failing which ICC will replace India.

ICC can replace India now too. India has said they won't Travel to Pakistan.

If India participates it will play all scheduled matches as per the MPA.
 
do you see the fallacy of this argument?
you are talking about matches.. we are talking about just one game. ind vs Pak .. surely pcb will be aware that forfeiture would mean loss of income. part of it.. not all. but that will happen for other boards. how much Disney Star expect to earn from indo Pak games out of 3 Billion they paid to ICC? i would guess it to be around 30% .. thats gonna be a big loss for icc not just pcb.

so if Pak refuses to play India , ICC stands to loose because of that. so they will replace us? lol replace us for what? forfeiture does nt attract any such penalty. thats what you think or its written somewhere?
No India means for every match India will not play, ICC will lose money.

No pakistan means for every match Pakistan will not play, ICC will lose money.

It's not about 1 match rather span over multiple.

You make the conclusion where ICC will lose more and who has more leverage.
 
Tell ICC that invitation to BCCI's team has been cancelled. Team BCCI is no longer invited to Pakistan to participate in champions trophy even if they wished to. Remind ICC and the rest of world that they can continue to rake in billions with PSL alone and continue to survive without hosting team BCCI.
Demand ICC to give Pak team the respect it deserves now that they are the top most ODI team after smashing Aussies in Aussie land under Rizwan.
:inti
 
I don't see pakistanis going on various forums and crying about it. It's only the indian 😭😭😭
No… It is schadenfreude. ngl, it is fun seeing the cope, when India refuses to travel to Pakistan.
If PCB is capable, host CT without India.
The problem is PCB is not capable and relies on alms by Indian Cricket council.
 
No… It is schadenfreude. ngl, it is fun seeing the cope, when India refuses to travel to Pakistan.
If PCB is capable, host CT without India.
The problem is PCB is not capable and relies on alms by Indian Cricket council.
It’s actually obsession and it’s unhealthy.

Cope? All I see are Pakistanis wanting all cricket boards to travel for the champions trophy. It’s not about India, if it was Aus it would be the same thing. All you Indians are so self obsessed you think everything revolves around you when in reality your fellow countrymen know more about the PCB’s financial statements than anyone else on this board.
 
Unfortunately they are not only damaging Pakistan, they are also damaging cricket as a sport due to this selfish attitude. I can bet behind the scenes other cricket boards will be very unhappy with this, for them all revenues are important, and Pakistan is one of the biggest viewing audiences for the game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just highlighting the phony excuse of security issues given by the BCCI. The real reason has been revealed many times by the Indian posters in these threads, and that is to damage Pakistan by any means necessary.
Ohh sorry that you were living under a rock. India and Pakistan are adversaries in a zero sum game.
Btw just because we like the cope, doesn’t mean there are no security issues.
 
It is your


You are mistaken if you think Indian market won't watch the match if Pakistan is absent. As long as indians watch money will come.

No such allowance to teams to skip matches whenever they want. There is something called the MPA.
Im not mistaken by anything.

you are making lot of Assumptions. Foremost being icc will replace Pakistan with other team if Pakistan forfeits the match against India. there is no basis to do that. if Indian Market can match the revenues of Indo Pak Game with team like SL , ICC can simply shuffle the groups to ensure all India matches take place. Pakistan can agree to Hybrid Model and ask icc to change their group.. will icc do that? so far there is no basis to believe so. ICC has been consistently fixing the groups since 2013. why do you think that is the case?
 
Im not mistaken by anything.

you are making lot of Assumptions. Foremost being icc will replace Pakistan with other team if Pakistan forfeits the match against India. there is no basis to do that. if Indian Market can match the revenues of Indo Pak Game with team like SL , ICC can simply shuffle the groups to ensure all India matches take place. Pakistan can agree to Hybrid Model and ask icc to change their group.. will icc do that? so far there is no basis to believe so. ICC has been consistently fixing the groups since 2013. why do you think that is the case?

What about a knockout match? Will Pakistan play India in a knockout?
 
What about a knockout match? Will Pakistan play India in a knockout?
that bridge will be crossed if it comes to that. no guarantees. it will be PCB and decision of Pak Government if they allow it.

Did bcci give any guarantees that they will play matches in Pak? if they can skip MPA signs for Ct 2025 , surely Pakistan can hold off the MPA signs for T20 2026. Pcb would be just following the footsteps of BCCi
 
From Pak pov:

IF PCB and Pakistanis have any self respect, they should not budge and hold the tournament in Pakistan. It is only India who has an issue, so the onus is on India that they will withdraw if tournament is held in Pakistan. Since India refuses to com, there should not be a hybrid. It is only India that is suggesting Hybrid. It's as simple as that.

Question is Does PCB and pakistanis have the spine to stand to the original stand.


Giving up hosting rights would be showing weakness from Pakistan. The stance should be firm, ICC had awarded Champions trophy to Pakistan, and what's changed between now and then? That should be their argument. Make public conference and put ICC and cricketing community under pressure and question the ICC.

Pakistan isn't holding another ICC tournament for years anyways. This is your chance. You show weakness here, you're DONE
 
No India means for every match India will not play, ICC will lose money.

No pakistan means for every match Pakistan will not play, ICC will lose money.

It's not about 1 match rather span over multiple.

You make the conclusion where ICC will lose more and who has more leverage.
if ICC does its job Right , That being custodian of the game .. and not act like a commercial partner of BCCi , these problems would never arise. ICC should put its foot down and put and end to this by saying no team can refuse to travel to host country or get ready to be replaced. the loss would be just one tournament but this stupidity will end for future
 
PCB were given rights to host the Champions Trophy 2025.

Even though I like the idea of South Africa hosting it due to the atmosphere & diverse fans. I still believe it should be host by Pakistan.

Hybrid model just sounds unnecessary & exhausting. Either host it in Pakistan or move it somewhere else but not UAE.

For the love god, please let cricket win not stupid people in power who look for themselves.
 
that bridge will be crossed if it comes to that. no guarantees. it will be PCB and decision of Pak Government if they allow it.

Did bcci give any guarantees that they will play matches in Pak? if they can skip MPA signs for Ct 2025 , surely Pakistan can hold off the MPA signs for T20 2026. Pcb would be just following the footsteps of BCCi

We are talking about CT 2025. 2026 T20WC is far away. Sure Pakistan can decide to not come to India for any matches.

Will Pakistan play India in a knockout in CT 2025 if its played in a hybrid mode?
 
if ICC does its job Right , That being custodian of the game .. and not act like a commercial partner of BCCi , these problems would never arise. ICC should put its foot down and put and end to this by saying no team can refuse to travel to host country or get ready to be replaced. the loss would be just one tournament but this stupidity will end for future
Did BCCI objected to be replaced?
 
if ICC does its job Right , That being custodian of the game .. and not act like a commercial partner of BCCi , these problems would never arise. ICC should put its foot down and put and end to this by saying no team can refuse to travel to host country or get ready to be replaced. the loss would be just one tournament but this stupidity will end for future

Who will replace the 90 per cent revenue that comes from India? Find a replacement for that and India can be replaced.
 
We are talking about CT 2025. 2026 T20WC is far away. Sure Pakistan can decide to not come to India for any matches.

Will Pakistan play India in a knockout in CT 2025 if its played in a hybrid mode?
as a Pakistani we would not want that, we would rather forfeit the game than to travel as host to accommodate mighty Indian team. but its upto PCB and Government. if they do decide to forfeit , there is no penalty in rules book of icc other than reduction in revenue share which shall be fine with pcb
 
Who will replace the 90 per cent revenue that comes from India? Find a replacement for that and India can be replaced.
you miss the point. when you act as a custodian of the game and not commercial partner of member board , 90% or 100% source of revenue does nt matter
 
as a Pakistani we would not want that, we would rather forfeit the game than to travel as host to accommodate mighty Indian team. but its upto PCB and Government. if they do decide to forfeit , there is no penalty in rules book of icc other than reduction in revenue share which shall be fine with pcb

There are many penalties if a host decides to forfeit games as Pakistan has signed a hosting agreement.

There are penalties if any team refuses to play a match after signing the MPA.

You think BCCI didn't sign the MPA for no reason.
 
Back
Top