in_cutter
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2005
- Runs
- 17,071
- Post of the Week
- 1
My review of The Exorcist 3
I don't usually start a review off by mentioning performances. But in this case I must. So much of what works in this movie, works because of its two leads. George C. Scott and Brad Dourif are two of the most volatile, compelling and skilled performers. In this film, we see them at the peak of their powers. George C. Scott is known for his outbursts and this film possibly contains his greatest ones. Brad Dourif also really cranks it up as the psychotic serial killer.
Overall, this is a masterful example of how to craft a horror movie. Most people know The Exorcist 3 because of its infamous jump scare. (Which I am not going to spoil, and which I recommend you do not look up on YouTube since the whole point is that you do not know that it is coming) This is a bit unfortunate because it sometimes overshadows how good the rest of this movie is. Nevertheless, it is probably the greatest jump scare ever put in a film, and any filmmaker who wants to put one in their movie, should sit down and study it. Perfect set up and execution in terms of blocking, camera angles and sound.
The movie is atmospheric with a looming sense of dread throughout. William Peter Blatty knows exactly what to show and what to leave out. An example is the protagonist describing a horrific murder at the start of the film. The director could have easily shown us this. It is often said that a good director shows and doesn't tell. In this case, Blatty does the opposite and it works for two reasons. Firstly, because of the calibre of the actors at his disposal. Secondly, it allows him to sustain tension throughout the film by hinting at these horrors, but only displaying them when the time is right. The use of horrific religious imagery is also very effective.
Not only does this work as a horror film, it is an excellent sequel. Thematically, it explores similar ideas as the first film such as faith, and the battle between good and evil. Yet it looks at these things through a more modern lens. This is evident by the more urban feel of the movie, along with the hospital setting where metallic and cold hallways act as demonic hunting grounds.
Interestingly, this is only one of two films that Blatty has directed. He is primarily a novelist who wrote the books that both this movie and the first were based on. This is why the dialogue here feels like something out of a novel rather than a horror film. An aspect that I personally appreciated.
I was disturbed, yet satisfied by the ending at the same time. Two emotions that don't often blend. Blatty holds nothing back, yet somehow executes the ending with enough care to keep one thinking after the credits roll.
There are some issues here though. It is evident that Blatty is not as skilled a filmmaker as William Friedkin, who directed the first film. The film isn't exactly the best looking and the sound feels a bit off at times. Two people will be talking in the same room at the same intensity, yet one will be much louder. The use of sudden jump cuts can also be a bit jarring and release some of the built up tension. There are also some strange directorial decisions. Throughout the film we see POV shots from the killers perspective, yet we randomly get one from the protagonists perspective. Some might argue that this is done to establish the conflict between the two. I think its just thrown in there without a purpose.
Ultimately, these are all minor issues and The Exorcist 3 is one of the great horror movie sequels.
Severely underrated movie this. Watched it several times.