Bro first you say don't hurl accusations, now you're saying do as you please and I'll call you out
.
Bro first you say don't hurl accusations, now you're saying do as you please and I'll call you out
constant complaints about high five culture when we can't even hold a normal conversation with you folks .
Welp war it is.
He dropped himself? Where’s the evidence. Not saying you’re lying, but that’s the first I’ve heard of this fairytale
Rizwan did a presser where he said that he went to the coach and captain telling them it’s time for him to be dropped and Sarfaraz should have a go. (He knew the writing was on the wall anyways)
Fixed.
Good that you agree with the initial post too.
But someone who averages 5 with the bat is a match winner got it.
I still remember @Dr_Bassim saying that Fakhar and Imad are match winners.
Rizwan has won no game till now for Pakistan?
First of all, you can probably find some of my old posts where, before Imad’s retirement, I also said that I think he would be useful because of his experience in CPL. I don’t really care for the whole fake retirement thing and return, it just reeks of attention seeking behavior, and it made me sour on him a bit but he deserves a run in the side and I hope he performs well because he can be a useful option. He is certainly a better bowler than Nawaz and Iftikhar in T20s.
The thing is, if you dig deep down the rabbit hole, you'll find flaws with every single human being.
Once again, based on the standard you yourself have set out, which match winning performances in T20 intentional tournaments has Imad had? Don’t mention “meaningless” bilateral matches against C and D sides or mention far more “meaningless” franchise cricket performances against even weaker attacks.
Without a doubt. His record speaks for him. Can a hater name a better wk batsman? Answer is NO
The only players that are genuine match winners for Pakistan are
The argument is about calling Imad Wasim a match winner. If Imad Wasim is a “match winner” then Shadab is about 10x more of a match winner.
Oh, I'm not addressing what you and Dr bassim are arguing, bro I'm just making a comment and adding to a discussion
.Naseem is my first or second favorite bowler in Pakistan. I’ve been trying to defend him for a long time from people who say he’s just a “support bowler.”Oh, I'm not addressing what you and Dr bassim are arguing, bro I'm just making a comment and adding to a discussion
Also why not include naseem in that list?
Why is naseem slept on, I don't think people realise a bowler who's consistently averaged below 6 in an era where odi is becoming an extension of t20 and barring one game which tbf he got Gill dismissed 2x if it wasn't for foolish chacha, He has taken one wicket in every international game he's played.
In every game barring one he's taken anywhere upto 1 to 5 wickets per game?
People don't understand how valuable that is. He gets slept on heavily for some reason, I've already claimed he's the best bowler in Pakistan period. Although tbf shaheen when fit is a much better new ball bowler no question.
Yeah exactly averaging 5 wins you game a long with 100 bowling average.
They can zeeshan ashraf, Mohammad ikhlaq, Ali shan etc.
If Imad was to have a career million times he won't come close to fakhar
Okay fair enough, we just disagree on how important Imad is to the squad. I think he can be a useful option, especially considering his experience playing in those conditions, but I just don’t think his selection is what’s going to make or break the squad.
Give them as many chances as Rizwan and you will get your answer
1. Rizwan is a better keeper than Sarfaraz
What’s his record as a keeper in comparison to all keeper’s who have passed before him? Let’s see if the record speaks for itself
You mean sarfraz. As he played for years without any performances. Rizwan stats in international are miles better than these players domestics. good try.
His performances as a captain were decent, and where he was batting.
His 95 in Melbourne and 80 in Sydney are better than anything any Pak keeper has ever achieved.
good Test average in SENA is not a record?Have you seen Sarfraz dance on those pitches?
I mentioned to you brilliant knocks in what is regarded as toughest conditions for Pak cricketers. Not just 1 game. And there are obviously more
Just share the record in comparison to others.
Yeah averaging 20 is decent in your book. As I said those players would struggle to match sarfraz even at this stage let alone our greatest wk.
I bet you're one of those who's secretly wishing for usman khan demise even though the lad left everything to play for Pakistan
There is no one better than him. Some haters thinks zeeshan ashraf who can't even get into the million domestics teams is better lol. Long may it continue.
Their is, that man's name is usman khan
Can you tell me his list a average and FC? The guy doesn't even have a 50 in FC.
No but he has an entire PSL over rizwan
what's this got to do with t20?
He's gonna say have you seen rizwan's avg
I think it's 41 now.ye average of 42 at the strike rate of 126
I am talking all formats genius. The posters are saying he's better in all formats. Keep up.
Which is what let down Sarfraz.
No he has not achieved everything sarfraz has ever dreamed off.
How?
Sarfaraz does have a trophy in his cabinet, actually he has 3. CHampions trphy, PSL, U19 world cup. Rizwan has just 1 PSL to show and nothing to show when it comes to international events.
Many great players never won ICC trophy.
He's a Pakistani great for sure
Umar Akmal is a Pakistan GOAT t20 middle order bat if that’s the case
He was decent for a period of time. But ordinary overall record
during his peak time, surely he was.
I asked this question in Savak’s thread…
