shah_1
Senior T20I Player
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2012
- Runs
- 20,802
Sarfraz is a very mediocre keeper, who can bat decently.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so bitter)
have some cheeni yaaar)
Sarfraz is a very mediocre keeper, who can bat decently.
Ronchi is indeed better in ODIs. Come back when Sarfraz scores 170 vs Sri lanka. One hundred vs Ireland and he's better.
Sums up Pakistani mentality.
Sarfraz in ODIs at the moment is Mushfiqur Rahim/Ramdin level.
Elliot is showing no signs of pressure, still scoring with over 100 strike rate.
Great find for NZ.
I missed Sarfraz's innings vs. Australia. How was it? I heard he got caught in the slips in similar fashion.
In ODI's only?? Ronchi sure has fallen a lot.
And the SL attack was by no means a world beater. You are making it sound as if he scored Marshall. They too are full of trundlers. Sarfraz smashed them at their home turf, I am sure he can do so again.
Nz will win.. Have placed a bet of 20$ @ 6.50 on nz
Elliot is showing no signs of pressure, still scoring with over 100 strike rate.
Great find for NZ.
Terrible cricket from many NZ batsmen here. Wicket is road , won the toss and still batted with so poor application.
Terrible cricket from many NZ batsmen here. Wicket is road , won the toss and still batted with so poor application.
Best you could do? There's a difference between opening and coming in at 7 at the batting PP.
Lets see... Will get 130$ if they win..and will give a a beer [emoji6]You are gonna lose all the money.
Yeah, he definitely can score 170 in an ODI coming in when the team is 5 down for 70 odd. Please have some perspective.
If Sarfraz would have played that innings while Ronchi would have scored a 49 and a hundred vs. SA and Ireland, would you have called Ronchi better? I know the answer.
And I'm talking about ODIs not Tests. Sarfraz is better in Tests in Asia because he's a much better player of spin.
Such bias.
This is going to be the most one-sided final in WC history.![]()
No he cant. But many other cant as well. That doesnt make one less of a player.
No and I havent even called Sarfraz better. He has a long way to go but so has Ronchi. Certainly not at a stage where he can be labelled "way" better than Sarfraz and that was the point of the post. And some fun too
Good to see you coming round. Sarfraz is indded the better test bat. No bais at all.
This is going to be the most one-sided final in WC history.![]()
NZ have thrown this away hence I wanted SA to play against Australia.
Australia started well, but NZ did recover but lost 3 quick wickets in the 1st two of the batting powerplay.
When SA get on top they seldom throw it away.
What's disappointing the most is they lost 3 wickets to a nothing bowler in Faulkner.
And you forgot the 170 vs Sri Lanka. Imagine if Sarfraz comes anywhere close to that.
SA would have batted much much better in first innings.
Only Pakistan has troubled Australia in the knock-out match otherwise it's been too easy
Ronchi is comfortably a better wicket-keeper batsman in ODIs and more proven with bat and the gloves. It's nothing to ')' at.
Sarfraz > Ronchi in Tests is a fact, just like Ronchi > Sarfraz is in ODIs (for now).
Get warner and smith early and its just hacks remaining
When was the last time we saw a competitive World Cup Final?
pak ind t20 final
When was the last time we saw a competitive World Cup Final?