What's new

A sincere question to Indians, what did your government achieve from "Operation Sindoor"?

uppercut said:
Post me the most important timestamp that has the most important evidence according to YOU





And ? I got Pakistani AND Amreeki AND other non-indian defense analysts saying the opposite ... but difference is they talk with satellite images. So showtime .... where is the exact timestamp on that video where irrefutable clinching evidence is being presented ?
Click to expand...

your own defence analysts and journalists crying to media - stating that you got hammered and modi was useless

@straighttalk

control yourselves, i dont wanna see your bottom lip wobbling and you making weaping sounds lol
 
ahsan17 said:
She is discussing things at a strategic level, not tactical level.
Click to expand...

Absolutely not ... because she mentions 1 to 3 jets being shot down ... which is why I asked that question.

ahsan17 said:
I know for you guys it helps to miss the forest for the trees, but no one else sees it that way.
Click to expand...


So you won the war despite 11 bases being pounded ? Is that what you are trying to say?
 
ahsan17 said:
She is discussing things at a strategic level, not tactical level. I know for you guys it helps to miss the forest for the trees, but no one else sees it that way.
Click to expand...
just proves how delusional he is - showing fake satelite ai images = yet he's said to me that he doesnt acnowledge these images when i showed him the indian air bases pakistan hit.

Indian Air Bases got Struck | Satellite Imagery Analysis | Defence Reactions​



he also said pakistan didnt hit any indian bases : yet ive showed him the indian briefing - thr own colonel sophie qureshi confirming we hit many of thr bases - but watch the whole video below, he proves the jets we shot down - pictures from india own media:


indian jounalists admitting to thr own media, that they got hammered:



@Champ_Pal @straighttalk @Bhaijaan @uppercut - watch all the videos,
 
uppercut said:
Absolutely not ... because she mentions 1 to 3 jets being shot down ... which is why I asked that question.




So you won the war despite 11 bases being pounded ? Is that what you are trying to say?
Click to expand...
You are cherry picking one sentence. You ignored all the diplomatic repercussions she discussed.
 
ahsan17 said:
You are cherry picking one sentence.
Click to expand...

Its not me that is cherry picking. Its her that is doing that by completely ignoring what India did and only to highlight the jets that India lost. Thats just being very dishonest. BTW if you go look at her videos where she is talking to Indian media she sings a different tune and openly says that the Pak army used LeT and that Pakistan can never win a conventional war against India.​

ahsan17 said:
You ignored all the diplomatic repercussions she discussed.
Click to expand...

Last time I checked there are no sanctions on India, no trade deal with US yet, refused to buy F-35, India still buys Oil from Russia and they just signed a military/trade deal with UAE so what diplomatic repercussions are you talking about ?
 
uppercut said:
Its not me that is cherry picking. Its her that is doing that by completely ignoring what India did and only to highlight the jets that India lost. Thats just being very dishonest. BTW if you go look at her videos where she is talking to Indian media she sings a different tune and openly says that the Pak army used LeT and that Pakistan can never win a conventional war against India.​



Last time I checked there are no sanctions on India, no trade deal with US yet, refused to buy F-35, India still buys Oil from Russia and they just signed a military/trade deal with UAE so what diplomatic repercussions are you talking about ?
Click to expand...
Since IND had the upper hand for 3 days of Op Sindoor , are you aware of the terms & conditions which we made PAK accept before agreeing to their 3rd party plea [ via the USA ] for a ceasefire ? c @DeadlyVenom @Bhaag Viru Bhaag @The Bald Eagle
 
Operation Tandoor has exposed India very badly. It was not just a military defeat but also a PR defeat.

After Tandoor, India never threatened Pakistan again (even after the recent Delhi attack). It shows India suffered a big defeat and they don't want to experience it again. :inti
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bhaag Viru Bhaag said:
Mr. Tabela (see I can do it better than you, munne), why don't you share the terms that Trump allegedly imposed on Modi? @Human786 was actually asking whether you are aware of the "terms and conditions", but instead of answering, you started cross-questioning him. Why don't you explain why the ceasefire happened, and why Modi said "Pakistan ne hum par hi hamla karna shuru kar diya"? Was it because of the loss of some Rafale jets involving Pakistan, or something else related to Mr. Dolaand Trump and Surender Mowgli? Chal jawaab de. #PuchtaHaiBharat :yk :inti
Click to expand...
Viru , it is because he is cluless about how to respond !!!
 
Human786 said:
Viru , it is because he is cluless about how to respond !!!
Click to expand...

there is no suchvthing as terms and conditions when dealing with an absolutely rogue state like pak... you think they are following the "terms and conditions " that were agreed after 1971 war ?

So now what is the answer to my question ?

Mods if this guy posts insults .... my responses will be equally brutal.
 
uppercut said:
in other words you got no timestamps in that video where credible evidence is presented that I can see. Right ?
Click to expand...
no thr whole videos shows your indian defence analysts admitting we took down nunerous of jets and we hit your bases - they also conceled defeat - calling modi useless,

but typical your crying like a indian, heres another video for you to cry about :

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921651981946401062
 
uppercut said:
Its not me that is cherry picking. Its her that is doing that by completely ignoring what India did and only to highlight the jets that India lost. Thats just being very dishonest. BTW if you go look at her videos where she is talking to Indian media she sings a different tune and openly says that the Pak army used LeT and that Pakistan can never win a conventional war against India.​



Last time I checked there are no sanctions on India, no trade deal with US yet, refused to buy F-35, India still buys Oil from Russia and they just signed a military/trade deal with UAE so what diplomatic repercussions are you talking about ?
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/1921603692567867785
 
uppercut said:
there is no suchvthing as terms and conditions when dealing with an absolutely rogue state like pak... you think they are following the "terms and conditions " that were agreed after 1971 war ?

So now what is the answer to my question ?

Mods if this guy posts insults .... my responses will be equally brutal.
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/1921534776080490705

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921003592938389786





Enjoy - have a ribeye while watching them:

@Vikram1989 you ran off again, @Champ_Pal @Romali_rotti @rpant_gabba
 
uppercut said:
there is no suchvthing as terms and conditions when dealing with an absolutely rogue state like pak... you think they are following the "terms and conditions " that were agreed after 1971 war ?

So now what is the answer to my question ?

Mods if this guy posts insults .... my responses will be equally brutal.
Click to expand...
We initiated the war and had the upper hand. On day 3, a third party ("Doland" Trump) declared a ceasefire. What terms and conditions did Modi, who had the upper hand, impose on the vanquished before agreeing to the ceasefire, directly or through Trump ?
Tamiz mein rehkar jawagb dena Modi ke bhakt !
 
finalfantasy7 said:
no thr whole videos shows your indian defence analysts admitting we took down nunerous of jets and we hit your bases - they also conceled defeat - calling modi useless,

but typical your crying like a indian, heres another video for you to cry about :

https://twitter.com/x/status/1921651981946401062
Click to expand...

Apparently, as many as 20 Indian jets were on locks. Pakistan could've downed up to 20 Indian jets. But, they decided to just shoot 6 or 7. I guess Pakistan showed restraint.

I feel like Pakistan should've smashed India more. Missed opportunity. :inti

www.geo.tv

‘We could have shot down 20 Indian jets' but showed restraint: Bilawal

Bilawal says Pakistan acted in self-defence, as permitted under UN Charter.Says India targeted civilian infrastructure, including dams, religious sites. Calls on global community to help reduce tensions and encourage...
www.geo.tv www.geo.tv
 
the Great Khan said:
Erm what are you smoking. There is ample visual evidence of aircraft shot down. Its not in dispute. Your side has admitted it. As for the other satellite evidence well that is now seeping through. Clear damage on amritsar is already available in the public domain and other sites. Visual evidence of akhnoor crash , Batinda crash and others available. Now like I said you can live in your Modi world. Thats your perogative but the reality is known to those who a) know and b) have some basic knowledge to analyse. You can dream and come.on here and post your nonsense but it doesnt matter. I can say the world is flat and the moon made of cheese and keep.living in that delusion but it won't make it true. The fact isnthe IAF is as of now no match for the PAF. Simple fact.
Click to expand...
Please share evidence of whatever you claimed...i know you cannot share anything. Authentic beyond. The bs001 visual and the cds admitting a jet down. But still go for it . And while paf has this superiority ask your esteemed jarnail why is Kashmir still with India and IWT suspended ..after all it is act of war and holy jihad for Munir... 🤣
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top