mak36
First Class Captain
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2016
- Runs
- 6,079
- Post of the Week
- 3
It might be Starc who has been getting all the attention but it is Hazelwood who has delivered the goods this innings.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It might be Starc who has been getting all the attention but it is Hazelwood who has delivered the goods this innings.
2nd best batsmen in the world fails to convert 80% of the time)
![]()
Root does not have the 50/100 conversion rate to get right to the top of the tree alongside Smith, Williamson & Kohli. Captain needs to dominate & lead & set matches up, not chip in a handy 50.
What is Kohli doing there? He's clearly inferior to the other three. Root may not score many centuries but he's one of the most consistent batsmen in the world.
What?
Kohli has the best conversion rate in the world.
Conversion Rate (%)
Kohli: 56%
Smith: 48%
Root: 29%
Williamson: 40%
Root does not have the 50/100 conversion rate to get right to the top of the tree alongside Smith, Williamson & Kohli. Captain needs to dominate & lead & set matches up, not chip in a handy 50.
And? That makes him one of the best test batsmen in the world?
Would be nice if he used some of his conversion powers in England.
Two very handy innings by Moeen Ali in this test already. So much for the whole 'the bounce will expose him' nonsense that was circulating on this forum.
The only thing left to see now is whether he can turn this handy contribution into a match-winning one.
Worst 50s to 100s conversion rate:
20.41 Misbah (10/49)
23.29 VVS Laxman (17/73)
25.00 A Stewart (15/60)
25.81 M Atherton (16/62)
27.03 B Simpson (10/37)
27.91 B McCullum (12/43)
28.26 JOE ROOT (13/46)
** Min 10 100s
Slats/Warne have to be the most biased commentary duo in existence.![]()
Watch BT Sport. It's much better.
Watch BT Sport. It's much better.
Agreed that England is the centre of the world.
Between the overall run rate in this match and Moeen scoring a few runs, there's a few people on here that will be pretty quiet today![]()
Just goes to show how crappy a batsman Misbah was even in his most preferred format.
![]()
Aussies cheating with the wobbly crease![]()
Lyon is clearly out bowling moeen bhai. Looking ominous for England.![]()
Not the center but certainly one of the most important tests of a batsman's career. Besides, it's not like Kohli has done wonders everywhere else in the world. A paltry two tests in South Africa, none in the UAE and his heroics in Australia were the result of some pathetic pitches.
Anyways, this is not the thread to speak of Kohli.
Indeed. A shame he was robbed of a fifty.
Crappy? He was pretty good. Like I said, consistent fifties can be just as useful as a few failures followed by a big ton. Depends on what the other players are like and for a team like Pakistan who were prone to collapses, Misbah was a true blessing.
That's a harsh call. Should have given it to the batsman. The crease is far too thick and even then, there is a tiiiiny bit behind/over the line.
And Moeen has outbowled Ashwin.
Ashwin has taken 4/67. Not sure which match you are talking about.
Moeen outbowled Ashwin in Australia.
Wasn't that hard to figure out what he meant.
Fair enough. maybe
But where does ashwin figure in a Eng vs Aus Ashes match, for which this thread is on.
It doesn't. Just a passing comment to a troll. Let's drop it and bash Bairstow for being silly.
England hard done with both the Moeen and Broad decisions. Snicko spike was clearly after the ball had went past.
All over.
This score isn't enough to defend.
The blame might go to the guys who did nothing but Root, Ali, and Bairstow threw it away after doing the hard work.
So, pointing out that Lyon out bowled Moeen, is basically trolling, according to you.
LMAO, it shows who is the real Troll.
Lyon in England's first innings, 2-78.
Moeen in Australia's first innings, 2-74.
"clearly outbowling"
Lyon in England's first innings, 2-78.
Moeen in Australia's first innings, 2-74.
"clearly outbowling"
Smith is in god mode.England still have a chance if they can get Warner within the first couple of overs and then nip another couple, including Smith.
It can definitely happen because Anderson and Broad are quality and Moeen will have some help from the pitch.
Australia are definitely the favorites.
How did Ali throw it away?The guy was robbed.
Bits & pieces spinners don't work in AUS - the difference between 2 sides in this Test was Lyon & Moeen - swap them (including Moeen's 78 runs in Aussie account) - it would have been a closer match. Instead of Woakes, Masson Carnie would have made this match real tight.
Exactly.
I had mentioned the same thing earlier, but i was labelled a TROLL by someone.
The whole cricketing world can see very clearly that Lyon is a class bowler who recently made even the Indian batsmen (who are decent against spin) run for their money at Home and also made tremendous impact in the outcome of this match.
Traditionally, ENG picks spinners on duel purpose (apart from very few), but Aussies select spinners for bowling. Few months back, I wrote somewhere that historically, the biggest difference in Ashes had been spinners and that's statistically can be proved.
ENG mostly picked spinners who could bat a bit or condition dependent (mostly 4th innings) specialist, while for Aussies, it has often been one or 2 master spinner, who were beyond wicket/condition. Starting from Trumble, Saunders, Ranji Horden, Mailey, Grimmet, O'Reily, Benaud, Warne, McGill had been the telling difference in Ashes; probably Lyon is going to do that this time. In recent memory, only decade Poms matches Aussies with spinners was 50s, when Laker, Lock won 3 or 4 Ashes. Pace attack was equally matched by Truman, Statham, Tyson vs Lindwall, Miler & Davidson; but English Spin attack was superior.
Though at Gabba, but this was probably closer to UAE than AUS wicket and ENG got the chance to bat first - don't think, they'll get a better chance than this one at SCG, MCG or Adelaide (At WACA, unless like Gabba it changed now, Aussies will bat once).
Bits & pieces spinners don't work in AUS - the difference between 2 sides in this Test was Lyon & Moeen - swap them (including Moeen's 78 runs in Aussie account) - it would have been a closer match. Instead of Woakes, Masson Carnie would have made this match real tight.
Its the last ever Ashes test match at the WACA so I think they'll want a fast and bouncy wicket for nostalgia.
Traditionally, ENG picks spinners on duel purpose (apart from very few), but Aussies select spinners for bowling. Few months back, I wrote somewhere that historically, the biggest difference in Ashes had been spinners and that's statistically can be proved.
Not really. Moeen and Lyon had pretty much identical figures in the first innings, with Lyon being more economical and Moeen getting his wickets at a better SR.
In the second innings, all the Australian bowlers bowled really well, except for maybe Cummins. Hazlewood getting two yesterday, Lyon getting the three left-handers at regular intervals and then Starc blasting away the tail, without allowing them to get a few extra runs were all crucial contributions.
It is extremely simplistic to put this result down to the performances of two men. I can just as easily say that switch Smith and Root and the result would be much closer, or switch one of the Aussie pacers with their English counterparts.
Australia just out performed England ever since Smith and Marsh got together for their partnership.