jnaveen1980
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2016
- Runs
- 45,464
This is such a disappointing ending. Of all the people getting out to Marsh who was just pie chucking.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why some neutral supporters are feeling happy if SA plays well... Oh feeling happy by seeing other nation do well in test than own team
Gone Markram.
![]()
Fair to say Keshav Maharaj has outbowled GOAT ??
They have no idea how to react lol So they just say random things instead of watching the match and appreciating it.
At least few Indian fans want AUS to do well, so that gap between 1st and 2nd in test ranking increases.. :![]()
Try going through scorecard of Joburg test v India 2013. Atleast that test started on a spicy pitch but ended docile.
Lyon is one of the most over-rated spinner. His success largely depends on how well the seamers bowl. Most of his wickets are tailenders.
For what? India scored 701 runs at 35 runs per wicket, way higher than the national average.
Even if SA chase this, they won't, they would have scored 584 at 29.2 which is exactly the national average. Again my question still stands, what's your point? What's the India match got to do with this one?
How India missed a bowler like Starc. Just a bit of reverse is enough for this guy to wipe out tail.
Lol, the look in dressing room. Starc on a hat-trick on a flat deck.
Is that about the pitch or fingernails?Yeah, right. Ball reversing around the 25th over mark in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th innings. Flat docile pitch indeed.
I won't say this is flat. But no daemon in it. A bit of reverse. Need to deal with that. SC batsmen deal with that every day. Look at Lyons figures.
It is not about national averages . That is a weird one. Every pitch is different. A pitch can become docile aa time goes by within a test. This pitch was slow to start with and has become even slower. Only difference is Starc wiping out tail with a little bit of reverse swing. Reverse swing ia common on abrasive surfaces.
80.1 1 run MR Marsh to de Kock, 1 run
de Kock protecting the tail![]()
Imagine the reactions here if a desi batsman did that![]()
SA's second innings scores against India in the recently concluded series: 130, 258, 177.
Have to say at this point the Indian bowlers look as good as, or even better than Australia's much hyped pace attack.
What is it about then? Australia scores at 28 runs per wicket, below the national average (29.1) and you want to call that flat? It doesn't make any sense does it?
South Africa as well. In what world is this pitch flat? Or comparable to the one India got in 2013?
Is that about the pitch or fingernails?
I wrote yesterday, the grass in the outfield is lush and smooth. Any reverse is presumably obtained by ball-tampering.
Yeah, right. Ball reversing around the 25th over mark in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th innings. Flat docile pitch indeed.
Wasim and Waqar could also dismiss top order batsmen in Tests.Starc is the closest thing to a modern age Wasim/Waqar. Absolute gold.
Both countries are pretty poor on SC conditions.
I won't say this is flat. But no daemon in it. A bit of reverse. Need to deal with that. SC batsmen deal with that every day. Look at Lyons figures.
why the hell is Starc being denied a 10-fer by Smith?
why the hell is Starc being denied a 10-fer by Smith?
Positives for SA:
Markram century, Maharaj sucess and de Cock coming back to form![]()
why the hell is Starc being denied a 10-fer by Smith?
Yeah, right. Ball reversing around the 25th over mark in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th innings. Flat docile pitch indeed.
I’m at Kingsmead. (I nearly got mugged yesterday outside).The square around the wicket. The wicket in itself is very abrasive.
The point is this is a tough wicket. There's no running from that fact. The total amount of runs scored after 40 wickets will confirm that.
I’m at Kingsmead. (I nearly got mugged yesterday outside).
Believe me, there is only one other disused wicket on the square and it’s covered in grass.
There’s nothing in the surface to cause reverse.
I’m at Kingsmead. (I nearly got mugged yesterday outside).
Believe me, there is only one other disused wicket on the square and it’s covered in grass.
There’s nothing in the surface to cause reverse.
Both countries are pretty poor on SC conditions.
SC conditions? Wasn't aware Durban was in the subcontinent, thanks for informing me. SA has a poor record in the SC? That's also new to me as well.
So according to Indians this pitch is flat as they come but at the same time SA batting performance here should be compared to the batting performance against India oh apparently 'spicier' surfaces
Not much bounce or spin or pace.The point is this is a tough wicket. There's no running from that fact. The total amount of runs scored after 40 wickets will confirm that.
SC conditions? Wasn't aware Durban was in the subcontinent, thanks for informing me. SA has a poor record in the SC? That's also new to me as well.
SA's second innings scores against India in the recently concluded series: 130, 258, 177.
Have to say at this point the Indian bowlers look as good as, or even better than Australia's much hyped pace attack.
So according to Indians this pitch is flat as they come but at the same time SA batting performance here should be compared to the batting performance against India oh apparently 'spicier' surfaces
Lower order is pretty poor and that too against lower order specialist Starc.
From the India-SA series:
Markram batting avg 23.33, de Kock batting avg 11.83, Maharaj bowling avg 125
All it took for these 3 to find form was India departing SA![]()
I gotta say Raw pace, left arm from height cause more concern than the actual reverse. They were mostly late against Starc. Why couldn't he inflict the same damage to top order.
Imagine the reactions here if a desi batsman did that![]()
9 down and de Kock plays two successive maiden overs. Only one more day left, he is obviously batting for a draw.
I’m at Kingsmead. (I nearly got mugged yesterday outside).
Believe me, there is only one other disused wicket on the square and it’s covered in grass.
There’s nothing in the surface to cause reverse.
I don't care where you are.
There's black turf around the wicket. The analyst got a feel of the soil, it was rough as sandpaper.
A cricket ball will never reverse on its own without the abrasiveness of the surface or the square. A green outfield has nothing to do with anything.
SC type conditions. Yes SA have been bad lately.
There was never sharp spin , just slow. I was alluding to slow nature of wickets. Regarding fast bowlers not troubling ever , cue Srinath 1996.Yet Lyon has three wickets on this surface against poor players of spin. Fast bowlers don't trouble SA in the SC, never have, never will.
Make that 3 maidens.