What's new

Australia v South Africa | 2nd Test | Hobart | Nov 12-16, 2016 | Day 1

Abdullah719

T20I Captain
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Runs
44,825
Australia XI
DA Warner, JA Burns, UT Khawaja, SPD Smith*, AC Voges, CJ Ferguson, PM Nevill†, MA Starc, JM Mennie, JR Hazlewood, NM Lyon

South Africa XI
SC Cook, D Elgar, HM Amla, JP Duminy, F du Plessis*, T Bavuma, Q de Kock†, VD Philander, KJ Abbott, K Rabada, KA Maharaj

Starting time - 23:30 GMT (11th Nov), 04:30 PST (12th Nov)

South Africa won the toss and opted to bowl.
 
Last edited:
The Standard Bank Proteas have the opportunity to achieve something special when they take on Australia in the second Test match starting at the Blundstone Arena in Hobart on Saturday, but captain, Faf du Plessis insists it will be business as usual for his squad. A win would make the Proteas only the second team after the legendary West Indies team of the eighties and early nineties to win three consecutive Test series against Australia in Australia.

The hosts will take some comfort from their successful record at the ground, they have only lost one out of 12 matches over the last 27 years, a narrow 7-run defeat to New Zealand in 2011. For the Proteas, it is the first time they have held a 1-0 series lead on an away tour since Sri Lanka in 2014, and after series losses to India and England over the last 12 months, recent performances have given an indication of a squad on the rise and brimming with confidence.

“It’s good to see that there were a lot of good things said about this team and the direction that we are taking,” Du Plessis said of the reaction from South Africans after the win in Perth. “It speaks a lot for what we are trying to achieve, the goals we have set for ourselves. It’s good to see that people are talking about it. The way it looks from the outside to people is positive so it’s good to know.

“We have been preparing for the game like we would for any other,” he said. “The Australian team play as similar brand of cricket, they will be hurting from the previous match and they will try to turn that around. Its normal business and making sure we can keep our things as basic and as normal as we can.”

The conditions and inclement weather in Hobart have been the talking points in the build-up this week, and have prompted both teams to make a decision on the final XI on Saturday morning. The captain didn’t rule out the possibility of going with an all-seam attack, but says it will be reliant on the conditions above and the state of the pitch.

“Kyle (Abbott) and Morne (Morkel) are both in the mix, so we’d like to see the conditions,” he explained. “I haven’t seen the pitch again today. So we want to have a look and also decide what we want to do with the team – there’s a bit of weather around - to see which combinations to go with.”
 
It's not just the series on the line in the second cricket test but careers too, as Australia chase redemption after a horror few months.

Steve Smith's new-look team that began so promisingly 12 months ago is on the verge of being dismantled and returned back to the Sheffield Shield if there is no sign of improvement in Hobart.

Adam Voges is batting for his baggy green in Hobart and so is Mitchell Marsh – if he is given a reprieve. It's also a golden opportunity for Joe Burns to stake his claim for the opener's berth after missing the last two tests.

An impressive last summer for Australia is a distant memory for allrounder Mitchell Marsh.
MICHAEL DODGE/GETTY IMAGES
An impressive last summer for Australia is a distant memory for allrounder Mitchell Marsh.

Such is the uncertainty around the team and the weather forecast, the Australians departed from their recent practice of finalising their XI on the eve of the match. The last time they waited until the last minute was in Trent Bridge in 2015, when Australia was skittled for 60 and the Ashes were lost.

READ MORE:
* Smith: No cricket culture problem
* Lawson: Marsh to blame for struggles
* Warne: 'I'm not copping this'

Voges will play after being passed fit. After cashing in last summer, the runs have dried up for the late bloomer, who needs a big score to book a ticket to Adelaide.

The hosts' selection query is whether Marsh plays. The major factors determining his fate are the weather and the need to reduce the pressure on strike weapons Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood.

Both quicks are coming off huge workloads in the heavy defeat in Perth with concerns that Starc is "red lining" after his limited preparation.

Marsh's seam bowling would provide Australia cover if any of their quicks were to break down. If he did get the nod there would be no baggy green for South Australian batsman Callum Ferguson. Marsh could be dropped down the order from six to seven.

"We'll wait and see with that one," captain Steve Smith said.

Marsh's hopes of playing would plummet should the heavy rain forecast over the weekend arrive Saturday morning and limit the amount of play possible. That would reduce the need for Marsh's seamers, paving the way for Ferguson to debut.

Another scenario, though unlikely, is if Australia field an all-pace attack with Marsh as the fourth quick at the expense of spinner Nathan Lyon.

"I've never done it in my stint as captain, I'm not really sure that's the way we're thinking," Smith said.

"Obviously, we'll wait and see what happens in the morning with the weather. You might not need to have that extra bowling option if there is going to be lots of rain around and the bowlers are going to get some adequate rest with that.

"There are possibilities that we could go in with six genuine batsmen." Marsh, clearly, is not seen in that light.

The pressure building within the Australian camp is in marked contrast to the confidence of the Proteas, who are on the verge of playing their first test in 12 years without champion pair AB de Villiers and Dale Steyn.

"Everyone looked at ourselves [before the tour] and said we really need to up our game to try and make sure you put on performances that can be AB de Villiers-like," du Plessis said.

"That's what happened previous game when Dale went down. He's a guy that gets a lot of five-wicket hauls for us. With him missing out, Kagi [Kagiso Rabada] came in and did that.

"It's great to see guys can step in when eventually this team will go through another transition period – that's really important. Our team is really well-balanced with young and older guys, but the more we play together as a test team the better we will get because we're still quite inexperienced as a test team."

The Proteas are weighing up whether to pick Morne Morkel or Kyle Abbott as the fourth seamer while there is also talk spinner Keshav Maharaj will be left out to accommodate both quicks.

AT A GLANCE

Australia (likely): David Warner, Joe Burns, Usman Khawaja, Steve Smith (c), Adam Voges, Mitch Marsh, Peter Nevill, Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Joe Mennie, Nathan Lyon.

South Africa (likely): Stephen Cook, Dean Elgar, Hashim Amla, JP Duminy, Faf du Plessis (c), Temba Bavuma, Quinten de Kock, Vernon Philander, Keshav Maharaj, Kagiso Rabada, Kyle Abbott.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/cricke...utures-on-line-against-south-africa-in-hobart
 
Cant believe how much pressure Aus are in here - could do wonders for Pakistan or may turn out to be one of those "wake-up" calls that Aus need to thrash Pakistan
 
Cant believe how much pressure Aus are in here - could do wonders for Pakistan or may turn out to be one of those "wake-up" calls that Aus need to thrash Pakistan

More losses to South Africa may dent their confidence, but that would also dent their rating. The lower their rating, the lesser points we gain for a win over them (and the more we lose for a lost/drawn match). This is where differentiation between home and away matches would be good.

Australia usually have no hesitation about announcing their line-up before-hand - I suppose it's due to Voges' fitness that they delayed. Also interesting to see the composition of the team. Not sure how safe Mitch Marsh's spot is.

Unusual to see South Africa without de Villiers and Steyn. The transition towards the next generation is well underway.
 
Unusual to see South Africa without de Villiers and Steyn. The transition towards the next generation is well underway.

Like the article says. It'll be the first test in 12 years without either Steyn or De Villiers. The end of an Era as I don't see Steyn coming back for a sustained period.
 
Unusual to see South Africa without de Villiers and Steyn. The transition towards the next generation is well underway.

It had to happen sooner or later. I think it will make others try harder. As long as younger players give 100% , result will follow. Aus is no pushover in Aus so let's see how they play in rest of the series.
 
Last edited:
Understandable selections from both teams. From what I've heard of Mennie, Australia probably could've selected better seamers.
 
I don't like this Aussie selection.

They are so scared of their own middle order that they have dropped Mitch Marsh for a mediocre sixth batsman and they have picked a third seamer on the basis of his batting, even though his bowling isn't great.

I'd have kept Mitch Marsh as that third seamer ahead of Joe Mennie, but dropped him to Number 8 in the batting.

It's good news for Pakistan though!
 
Looks like Aussie selectors have lost the appetite for the runs from Petre Siddle & the "All-round" ability of Mitch Marsh - good, good.
 
Pakistan's definitely going to get flat wickets now...

I don't think so. They will get absolute greentops on the basis that Cricket Australia need to get the team winning, not drawing.
 
Looks like Aussie selectors have lost the appetite for the runs from Petre Siddle & the "All-round" ability of Mitch Marsh - good, good.

Siddle was steady bowler , not bad . But you are right , he had a knack of scoring runs down the order.
 
Kyle Abbott, another of my agents doing well. Few months ago I mentioned this guy is very underrated. Still remember how he sliced our batting wide open in SAF when Steyn was injured and it was his debut.
 
I don't think so. They will get absolute greentops on the basis that Cricket Australia need to get the team winning, not drawing.

Absolute green tops could help Aamir and Rahat . I think they will prepare flat but bouncy surfaces.
 
I don't think so. They will get absolute greentops on the basis that Cricket Australia need to get the team winning, not drawing.
CA isn't going to take that risk...

Australia will be looking to bat oppositions out of the game.
 
Absolute green tops could help Aamir and Rahat . I think they will prepare flat but bouncy surfaces.

No, with respect I disagree.

Greentops don't help swing bowlers at all. They help bowlers who bowl straight and hit the seam. And they need to be right arm bowlers who bowl from close to the stumps, because the new video-enforcement of the "running on the pitch" zone has pushed all left-arm bowlers wide of the crease, where they can't get LBW decisions.

Pakistan only has two bowlers who can bowl on greentops: Mohammad Asif and to a much lower level Hasan Ali.

Neither of them will be in the squad. So if Australia prepare a greentop, Pakistan has no weapons at all.
 
No, with respect I disagree.

Greentops don't help swing bowlers at all. They help bowlers who bowl straight and hit the seam. And they need to be right arm bowlers who bowl from close to the stumps, because the new video-enforcement of the "running on the pitch" zone has pushed all left-arm bowlers wide of the crease, where they can't get LBW decisions.

Pakistan only has two bowlers who can bowl on greentops: Mohammad Asif and to a much lower level Hasan Ali.

Neither of them will be in the squad. So if Australia prepare a greentop, Pakistan has no weapons at all.
We all saw what Amir did on a green top in the Asia cup.
 
We all saw what Amir did on a green top in the Asia cup.

Is that when he ran through the Indian top order?

If so, that is not what greentop bowling is, not at all.

That was just conventional swing bowling, and the two LBW wickets at the top swung late before the ball even touched the grass.

But worse, the move to video enforcement of the running on the pitch zone means that he couldn't take those wickets now, because he bowls from 18 inches further wide of the crease now. For the ball to pitch in line it now ends up missing the stumps by at least another another 2 stumps.

Trust me, unless some miracle gets Asif into the team, Pakistan has no weapons at all for a greentop.
 
Test matches against PAK will go to full distance - in fact this Test at Hobert will also go for a decent duration; it's not that bad a wicket. No matter how flat the wicket is, on 1st over of a Test, you don't expect to get away with a Jackie Chan style batting - that too after a rain delayed wicket. PAK might drop Warner at 2nd slip, about waste height; that's different story.

From a strategic angle, if I were to win 3-0 for AUS, against PAK; I would have never, never played on green tops or wickets that produces result in 3 days. That'll simply bring their bowlers in the game, would allow their customary batting collapse with a bits & pieces 20s & 30s sort of innings & more importantly will not cost their dropping of sitters. To understand the 3rd point, one has to go 6 years back at this same very ground to see what Panta did.

Good, hard, firm wicket, with a little bit of green grass (but not green enough to last for 5 days - that won't crack the wicket) - PAK will have to play really well to compete & bowlers will have to pray that not more than 2/3 dollies are dropped in a Day, as there won't be many to offer. Watching Aussies batting, I think, on green tops, even Yasir will skid on at pace & it's difficult to manage even on absolute green tops, if you have to see which way the ball is turning after it has pitched (instead of in-flight) & don't have the clue of spinning length.

I wish, Aussies play that Test Series on wickets where 450 is a match winning total - in combined innings.
 
Test matches against PAK will go to full distance - in fact this Test at Hobert will also go for a decent duration; it's not that bad a wicket. No matter how flat the wicket is, on 1st over of a Test, you don't expect to get away with a Jackie Chan style batting - that too after a rain delayed wicket. PAK might drop Warner at 2nd slip, about waste height; that's different story.

From a strategic angle, if I were to win 3-0 for AUS, against PAK; I would have never, never played on green tops or wickets that produces result in 3 days. That'll simply bring their bowlers in the game, would allow their customary batting collapse with a bits & pieces 20s & 30s sort of innings & more importantly will not cost their dropping of sitters. To understand the 3rd point, one has to go 6 years back at this same very ground to see what Panta did.

Good, hard, firm wicket, with a little bit of green grass (but not green enough to last for 5 days - that won't crack the wicket) - PAK will have to play really well to compete & bowlers will have to pray that not more than 2/3 dollies are dropped in a Day, as there won't be many to offer. Watching Aussies batting, I think, on green tops, even Yasir will skid on at pace & it's difficult to manage even on absolute green tops, if you have to see which way the ball is turning after it has pitched (instead of in-flight) & don't have the clue of spinning length.

I wish, Aussies play that Test Series on wickets where 450 is a match winning total - in combined innings.
Aussies will not prepare green pitches , they are not such fools. They would have worked out these factors.
 
Is that when he ran through the Indian top order?

If so, that is not what greentop bowling is, not at all.

That was just conventional swing bowling, and the two LBW wickets at the top swung late before the ball even touched the grass.

But worse, the move to video enforcement of the running on the pitch zone means that he couldn't take those wickets now, because he bowls from 18 inches further wide of the crease now. For the ball to pitch in line it now ends up missing the stumps by at least another another 2 stumps.

Trust me, unless some miracle gets Asif into the team, Pakistan has no weapons at all for a greentop.

But boss, I can recall Khan used to bowl from about 2 feet wide of wicket, and he had a damn good in-deeper, which had absolutely no chance of hitting the wicket (or getting LBW) by your logic - if it had stuck the batsmen on line or if it was to hit the stick. But, some how, he managed lots of LBWs, even in AUS - question is how? Same thing, I can say about Marshall - he wasn't the ideal close to stick bowler, but managed lots of LBW. And alas, John Snow was nothing different......

What you said about Amir is theoretically what you want to justify Asif's inclusion. It's not required - if he is fit, Asif should be in the squad & will be as well, I believe. For the 18 inch explanation, I beg to differ. By the law of LBW, it doesn't require to bowl from close to sticks - what it needs is hitting the batsmen in line & hitting the wicket. Great bowlers do adjust their delivery point, pitch map, bowling length to fit in to the wicket for an LBW shout. For example, in recent times, I have seen Ashwin using the width of wicket wonderfully - he'll adjust his delivery point according to the turn he is getting - he got Haseeb LBW with a ball that delivered from much more than 18 inch wide, that too from round the wicket to a right hander & it was bang on off stick, hitting the kid in front of middle.

Cricket is not played on theory - better bowlers will adjust their game (length, line, pace) to suit the condition & law of the game. Also you forgot to consider one more thing - Amir, Wahab & Rahat can practice bowling from round the wicket - they can bowl exactly from the closest angle for an LBW & their follow through will take them away from danger zone for left-arm action. The trick is not 18 inch or danger zone - the trick is how quickly Amir, Rahat, Wahab & Sohail can find their delivery stride to bring the ball on line either from over or round the wicket.

But yes, even without 18 inch & danger mat - if he is fit & still skilled enough, Asif should be there.
 
This "Color Quota" player is reaping through the Aussies - for God sake, there was a Color quota, otherwise this guy was destined to be dropped. :(
 
But yes, even without 18 inch & danger mat - if he is fit & still skilled enough, Asif should be there.

I do not think selectors want to see Asif in the team . But if he is fit , he can still be handful.
 
Today's proceedings are not completely unique.

I seem to remember something a bit similar 15 months ago, so does this guy.....

Broad1.jpg
 
But boss, I can recall Khan used to bowl from about 2 feet wide of wicket, and he had a damn good in-deeper, which had absolutely no chance of hitting the wicket (or getting LBW) by your logic - if it had stuck the batsmen on line or if it was to hit the stick. But, some how, he managed lots of LBWs, even in AUS - question is how? Same thing, I can say about Marshall - he wasn't the ideal close to stick bowler, but managed lots of LBW. And alas, John Snow was nothing different......

What you said about Amir is theoretically what you want to justify Asif's inclusion. It's not required - if he is fit, Asif should be in the squad & will be as well, I believe. For the 18 inch explanation, I beg to differ. By the law of LBW, it doesn't require to bowl from close to sticks - what it needs is hitting the batsmen in line & hitting the wicket. Great bowlers do adjust their delivery point, pitch map, bowling length to fit in to the wicket for an LBW shout. For example, in recent times, I have seen Ashwin using the width of wicket wonderfully - he'll adjust his delivery point according to the turn he is getting - he got Haseeb LBW with a ball that delivered from much more than 18 inch wide, that too from round the wicket to a right hander & it was bang on off stick, hitting the kid in front of middle.

Cricket is not played on theory - better bowlers will adjust their game (length, line, pace) to suit the condition & law of the game. Also you forgot to consider one more thing - Amir, Wahab & Rahat can practice bowling from round the wicket - they can bowl exactly from the closest angle for an LBW & their follow through will take them away from danger zone for left-arm action. The trick is not 18 inch or danger zone - the trick is how quickly Amir, Rahat, Wahab & Sohail can find their delivery stride to bring the ball on line either from over or round the wicket.

But yes, even without 18 inch & danger mat - if he is fit & still skilled enough, Asif should be there.

I refer you back to how often the Pakistan left-armers got called for running on the wicket in England. And in a 4 man attack, they can't afford for one of only three quicks to be removed from the attack by the umpires.

So trust me, Amir and Wahab and Rahat will continue to bowl from very wide of the crease in Australia, and they will get very few LBW decisions.
 
This "Color Quota" player is reaping through the Aussies - for God sake, there was a Color quota, otherwise this guy was destined to be dropped. :(

Yes and no.

Kyle Abbott and/or Morne Morkel should have played at the WACA - and were omitted because the team was at the maximum number of white players allowed.
 
Where are [MENTION=132373]Convict[/MENTION] and [MENTION=732]Gilly[/MENTION] when you need their input?
 
I refer you back to how often the Pakistan left-armers got called for running on the wicket in England. And in a 4 man attack, they can't afford for one of only three quicks to be removed from the attack by the umpires.

So trust me, Amir and Wahab and Rahat will continue to bowl from very wide of the crease in Australia, and they will get very few LBW decisions.

They will get very few LBW in AUS, simply because in AUS LBWs are less for the bounce. Warning for running on the mat is a task for Mickey & Azhar (Mahmood).

The question is about bowling on green tops - boss, it's difficult to believe that WITHOUT ASIF, this PAK pace attack won 2 Tests in ENG, now suddenly they'll struggle in AUS, because Asif is not there.

Imran, Marshall & Snow are still unexplained though ...
 
Yes and no.

Kyle Abbott and/or Morne Morkel should have played at the WACA - and were omitted because the team was at the maximum number of white players allowed.

Yes - they should have dropped Cook, an absolute lobby player, playing at the favor of his dad. Also, yes, Morne or Abbot should have played instead of Dale Styen - average bowler, only got one wicket & also got injured. :(
 
I don't think that's shoulder - I think Philander has done an intercostal muscle when Smith hit him.
 
Probably last over from Philander here

He has got a bit of rest for rain after 3 overs. May be, they'll swap the end with Abbot - you have to bowl 10/11 overs with Vernon in such condition with new ball. Also, lunch is not far away - he can have a good rest after that.

5 down - may be he can have rest after the Aussie innings :(
 
Yes - they should have dropped Cook, an absolute lobby player, playing at the favor of his dad. Also, yes, Morne or Abbot should have played instead of Dale Styen - average bowler, only got one wicket & also got injured. :(

Seriously, that's not in great taste.

Stephen Cook missed 6 years of Test cricket because Alviro Peterson was picked for quota reasons in spite of being an inferior batsman.

I marched for the Anti-Apartheid movement in the 1980s. But I didn't march for reversed racism.

Who picks three quicks and a spinner at the WACA? And South Africa had to, because they needed to pick a spinner for his colour.
 
Last edited:
In a week when Trump got elected the US President, the Australian cricket team look the most incompetent people of the week. Thats some accomplishment
 
Man We should Get Asif on Board in the next Available flight. This is Pakistan Great chance to beat Aussies. I just feel pakistan need asif with a new ball and when bowling conditions are overcast then he is Leathel. But Right now Aussies are playing like a club side. SA are on a roll here 3-0 on board guys.
 
Seriously, that's not in great taste.

Stephen Cook missed 6 years of Test cricket because Alviro Peterson was picked for quota reasons in spite of being an inferior batsman.

I marched for the Anti-Apartheid movement in the 1980s. But I didn't march for reversed racism.

Who picks three quicks and a spinner at the WACA? And South Africa had to, because they needed to pick a spinner for his colour.

AUS picked a spinner as well.

Regarding Cook - Alvero Petersen finished his Test career with 35 average & 5 hundreds, one in IND. He was averaging close to 40 until last few matches when he was dropped. This guy Cook made a hundred on debut in a dead rubber - since then his scores are 25, 20, 56, 4, 0, 12 and I must say, that 56 is one of the ugliest that I have seen (you also, I can recall you were posting during that Test). Both are similar aged with similar FC stats, but Alvero's scores has runs for 3 Counties; Cook's entirely in SAF - therefore, I am not sure how Petersen cost his 6 years.

I also don't like racial quota, but some of your comments regarding Vernon, Bvuma & other non white players are beyond decent. As I said, most of the non white players do merit their selection - in future what will happen, I don't know. But, I see a positive side of this as well - cricket is a dying game in SAF, unless the mass population is brought in this game, it'll die prematurely. May be it's costing some white players now, but that's what happen to many non white players for a century. Eventually, once cricket is established in mass community, I am sure, that quota won't be required. It's not that they have passed a bill in their constitution for this 6 players quota - it'll change in future for sure.
 
Thats harsh on sa, playing with 10 players 2 in a row

Hope Pphilander is OK. Would be so unfair on SA his match is done
 
OUT! It's all red and Nevill is gone for 3.

Australia now 6-31

Only rain can save them it seems
 
Man We should Get Asif on Board in the next Available flight.

This is Pakistan Great chance to beat Aussies.

I just feel pakistan need asif with a new ball and when bowling conditions are overcast then he is Leathel. But Right now Aussies are playing like a club side. SA are on a roll here 3-0 on board guys.
I know.

The argument in favour of Asif - even an Asif short on stamina - is now completely overwhelming.

The Aussies have completely lost their confidence against right-arm fast-medium bowling. A diet of Amir and Rahat and Wahab probably suits them.

To fail to send Asif now is a triumph of stubbornness over any will to win.
 
Smith looks so ungainly, even when he's batting well.

His strength is his awareness of his off stump. I think that is his saving grace. Out of all the batsmen in the world he's the best at decision making as to when to play and when to leave. I remember in Ashes 2013 which was his first breakthrough tour, showed impeccable discipline even then.

But yeah I hate watching him bat.
 
Du Plessis is a fabulous skipper.

He takes more risks than a typical South African skipper. Graeme Smith wouldn't have gone for that DRS review.

But although he's an attacking skipper, he's not excessively aggressive - and he treats the umpires with playful respect.
 
I know.

The argument in favour of Asif - even an Asif short on stamina - is now completely overwhelming.

The Aussies have completely lost their confidence against right-arm fast-medium bowling. A diet of Amir and Rahat and Wahab probably suits them.

To fail to send Asif now is a triumph of stubbornness over any will to win.

Asif himself has said it will take him a season to get fit enough for international cricket, he just missed his team's last first class match due to injury and in the game before that he was trundling so much the keeper was standing up to the stumps as though he was a spinner.

Talk of taking him to Australia is ridiculous and a triumph of stubbornness over looking at the facts.
 
Last edited:
Du Plessis is a fabulous skipper.

He takes more risks than a typical South African skipper. Graeme Smith wouldn't have gone for that DRS review.

But although he's an attacking skipper, he's not excessively aggressive - and he treats the umpires with playful respect.

surely that drs was more luck than anything else? there is no way he could have known 60% of the ball was hitting the stumps instead of 50%. i dont think doing for a review makes u an aggressive skipper, it's all blind luck.
 
Australia might want to go back to playing on roads again. They got five pitches in a row that offered movement and were destroyed five out of five. The pink ball test won't algive their batsmen any respite either but the series against Pakistan might see roads almost as pristine as the ones India were given. Not good.
 
Asif himself has said it will take him a season to get fit enough for international cricket, he just missed his team's last first class match due to injury and in the game before that he was trundling so much the keeper was standing up to the stumps as though he was a spinner.

Talk of taking him to Australia is ridiculous and a triumph of stubbornness over looking at the facts.

His timetable is irrelevant, it's what the team needs and when.

They need Asif's skills for Australian conditions - and they don't return for another 6 years.

The bottom line is that they need a tall, right-arm fast-medium bowler who moves it off the seam from a full length.

And neither Sohail Khan nor Imran Khan can do that.
 
I just feel PCB been unfair to Asif in comparison to Amir who was given a royal welcome despite being as guilty as any of the other 2. Personally Asif should be given another chance, as he still have 3 good yrs of cricket left in him, he is slim and skinny and his muscle and his body is still in good shape and he is not injury prone. He should have been in Inzamam selection plan for Aussies tour. Although i dont have any sympathy for Salman butt he should be left in wilderness in domestic for the rest of his life.
 
Back
Top