Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
why are nas and co laughing at Anderson's poor behaviour?
As much as I like your invincible maths, there was never a run there and every commentator who saw it agreed as well.
He could've been run out by a shorter distance if he ran better, but terrible call from Azhar. Robbed the poor kid of a well deserved ton.
That's fine - this pair easily could have taken time & not go for the risky one. But, better teams do run those & they do the basics correct. Also, Sami is about 5'4" & he wasn't holding the bat properly.
These are learning curves, at this age, if he doesn't repeat that, it's more than a Century in UK. Last generation of PAK players couldn't correct their basics after 15 years of International cricket.
Broad to Younis Khan, no run, jumpily forward, like a stalling car in a box junction, but safely defended to cover.
Azhar my boyyyyy always had faith in you!![]()
Imagine if a Pakistani bowler was getting this grumpy
To run out a youngster just 18 runs away from his maiden century in his third match, just to save his own neck becos he got scared of a bouncer!
To run out a youngster just 18 runs away from his maiden century in his third match, just to save his own neck becos he got scared of a bouncer!
To run out a youngster just 18 runs away from his maiden century in his third match, just to save his own neck becos he got scared of a bouncer!
To run out a youngster just 18 runs away from his maiden century in his third match, just to save his own neck becos he got scared of a bouncer!
To run out a youngster just 18 runs away from his maiden century in his third match, just to save his own neck becos he got scared of a bouncer!
Sorry for him indeed, but watch the clips few times more & you 'll see that Sami was caught like a rabbit in search light. He was almost chuckled seeing Azhar few steps in & started running from his heel, caught off guard. If he wasn't ready, easily could have shouted NO. He was going to the danger end - it was his responsibility to stop his partner, if he wasn't ready - Azhar could have easily returned safely.
Look, I know what I am writing & I am writing this after watching the replay.
Look at YK, hes mentally as tough as they come!
Hang in there Younis, the only way to come back into form is to spend as much time as you can at the crease
Where'd you get that from what we are watching
Trolling?No one is talking about Cook's brilliant captaincy here.
Where'd you get that from what we are watching
Say what you want about YK form at this stage in his career, but surely you cannot question the man's toughness. He may struggle, but he wont just give up.
Nailed it. Iced mentioned commentators said no single, but same commentators mentioned Sami was asleep at the crease, and back footed, not looking to take single at all.
Regardless, they have both put Pak in a completely dominating position. Lets hope the rest of the team can continue this, if we bat well, we can remove any chance of Eng winning at all.
Sorry, but you can't convince me under any circumstance that that is justifiable in this format. In LOIs yes, but tests, definitively no.
How do I see that in his numbers so far
To be honest he does try to fight
He did well in lords scoring 33 and 28 considering HOW MUCH he was struggling. Also ate up a lot of balls
Most of our other batsmen get our within a few deliveries if they are struggling that much
By his average, and double century tally.
Maybe Anderson has been so succesful in his career because he hasnt really been challanged for where he lands his feet?
Azhar did the 10 push upsCricinfo mentioned Anderson getting grumpy at azhars celebration. Can someone elaborate??
So true - then why he didn't stop his partner? He was running to the danger end, he was the non striker who should have been backing with the bowler & on his toes; he should have the head start as the striker needs to finish follow through, settle & then run.
Weather the single was there or not, that we can't prove, but the run-out was a fault of Sami. If he wasn't sure, he could have sent his partner - if Azhar got out, still not his fault.
It's not a question of Test or T20 - as long as PAK think tank believes that the run out was a fault of Azhar, same thing 'll happen time & again. There is a fundamental science of every running, which PAK doesn't follow. At highest level, I saw PAK management putting a gag on Inzi's mouth.
Ridiculous logic by Whinny Aerthon and Botham... May Karoon Tu Salla Character dahlia hai![]()
Azhar did the 10 push ups
Jimmy wasn't happy and said a few words.
He's been warned for running into pitch in follow through so wasn't in happy mood anyway
Finn has a hamstring, Anderson may get a 3rd warning...
Pretty soon Gary Ballance will be bowling
6 overs of Moeen pies before the new ball I suspect. Let's try getting 36 off them. It's important that these 2 are there when the new ball is taken.
Nothing wrong with a bit of banter. Getting into the opponents head is part of the game.
The fielder wasn't behind Azhar. He was well within his line of sight, in fact Sami probably couldn't see given that the short mid on was blocking his view as well. It was Azhar's job to judge and make the call, and he made a poor one. You won't convince me of otherwise, so let's agree to disagree.
Couldn't agree more. Sami wd really felt that he belongs to International cricket had he scored a century. Pity he would hv to start from starch in the next innings.That was very risky single even in T20 or in street cricket. There was never a run, why he had to start early? - We are talking about test cricket, where you focus on batting in very different way then in LOIs... Taking such a risky single is huge blunder, Azhar sold a young guy too cheaply. Imagine if that was YK on other end, Azhar would have never done that...
Anyway, its not end of the world, but a century would have given him loads of confidence, he fully deserved it...
I think so the new ball should swing and maybe England will think they can get a couple of quick wickets.Will England take the new ball today considering what's happened with Finn and Anderson?
I concede that Sami Aslam should have called a "NO", but in such close tight calls, often you don't think straight, but more importantly, you don't expect such calls in this format. It was the striker's call, and he called wrong. End of. It's irrelevant whether or not Sami could have ran faster or sooner. A risky call is a risky call, and that has no place in this format especially given the match context.