The Viper
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2018
- Runs
- 6,865
India 165
New Zealand 216/5 * (71.1 ov)
Can India fightback?
New Zealand 216/5 * (71.1 ov)
Can India fightback?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Will there be a early start?
Only if India bowl terribly.NZ to score 400+ here.
Only if India bowl terribly.
The new ball is just 8 overs away and the tail is longer than usual with Santner out.
This is the sort of position that Pakistan used to win from. Consider Hamilton 1992-93:
Pakistan 216
New Zealand 264
Pakistan 174 (at 39-5 they were still 9 runs behind)
New Zealand 93 all out chasing 127 to win.
Wasim Akram took 5-45 and Waqar Younis 5-22 as New Zealand collapsed from 65-3 to 93 all out, to lose by 33 runs.
That is the standard against which Bumrah and Shami and Ishant need to be measured.
And it’s why some of the recent criticisms of Waqar’s career are absurd.
How long has Dar been this bad?
I've read a lot of criticism for him on here.
The game is on knife edge - kiwis will need to double this lead for a significant advantage; india has second new ball in four overs time.
Jamieson will be the player of the series.
Only if India bowl terribly.
The new ball is just 8 overs away and the tail is longer than usual with Santner out.
This is the sort of position that Pakistan used to win from. Consider Hamilton 1992-93:
Pakistan 216
New Zealand 264
Pakistan 174 (at 39-5 they were still 9 runs behind)
New Zealand 93 all out chasing 127 to win.
Wasim Akram took 5-45 and Waqar Younis 5-22 as New Zealand collapsed from 65-3 to 93 all out, to lose by 33 runs.
That is the standard against which Bumrah and Shami and Ishant need to be measured.
And it’s why some of the recent criticisms of Waqar’s career are absurd.
Anybody else remember Tim Southees debut? Jamieson is bringing back memories of that.
I really am enjoying this finely balanced Test.
New Zealand is the opposite of Pakistan: a team with very little talent but good organisation. Usually they are a 8/10 team at home and 4/10 away, but they have gone into a transitional period of decline and are currently only a 5/10 team.
India have been close to the top in a very weak era, but they are a 9/10 team at home but only 3/10 away. If they had more humility they would prepare properly for overseas Test series. But consider the two tours of England in 2018. Pakistan arrived early and literally practised in a public park, then drew 1-1. India refused to do that, believing they know best, and after they tried to score over 400 to win a Test instead of saving it lost 4-1.
India should win Tests like today’s because the gulf in talent is vast. But Bumrah and Shami keep bowling ridiculous lengths and are really hurting their team. You need to adapt before a series, not during it.
Jamieson is really going to be dropped for the next Test lol.
Idk who Jamieson stays in the team for.
Southee has taken wickets too.
You gotta be kidding me right? That NZ team didn't have a single notable bat except probably Greatbatch who himself was average at best. Taylor alone is better than that entire line up and not even talking about Williamson and Watling. This is almost like comparing the Flower brothers' Zim with the current one. Ludicrous and makes no sense.
With all due respect to Wasim and Waqar they would not have found it that easy if they were up against this current NZ batting.
LOL Boult holding the pose after his swat 4.
Not related to the match but i'm intrigued to why you support NZ not India.
Aren't you Indian?
How did you come to the conclusion that the 2Ws would have struggled here? Just because of looking at the batting averages?
Looking so much like India of 90s ......
Nz tailenders are better than our batsman.