WebGuru
Senior ODI Player
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2013
- Runs
- 21,339
- Post of the Week
- 3
from 107/9 to 133/9 already...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You can lose a game straight off the bat if you aren't a great batting side but you give your batsmen confidence if you restrict the opposition to a decent total.And Pakistan are known as bad chasers regardless of grade..![]()
You can lose a game straight off the bat if you aren't a great batting side but you give your batsmen confidence if you restrict the opposition to a decent total.
Advantage India but lets not forget this India batting couldn't chase under 200 against Afghanistan. So if Adil/Qadir can take us to around 180, there is still a chance.
here we go again, play well through out the tournament and flop badly in the final. Pakistan at their best.
I hope No Anwar Ali show this time ...![]()
India to win by 6 wickets with 60 balls remaining.
India to win by 6 wickets with 60 balls remaining.
I still think we have a chance, just need to get Chand(or whatever his name is) early
India will be slow in the first 20 overs scoring about 70-80 runs then scoring 30 in the next 10 but I see them finishing off the last 60 runs quickly.I don't know what makes you say that so confidently.
Its NOT like India thrashed other teams when chasing similar totals.
The other opener, Rahul is more dangerous and has been more consistent with scores of 46, 88, 51 and 43 so far
Pakistan U-23s rather self-destructed from 88 for 2 and have somewhat saved by that last-wicket stand of 52. It remains a good track for batting on, better than at the start of the tournament when heavy rains had fallen just before the start of the event, making strokeplay difficult. Pakistan U-23 almost defended 191 then, things rather more in favour of India U-23 this time. The Indians starting their innings, in just a few minutes.As per cricinfo its a good batting wicket.
Not trolling when I say this but I think BK is a better prospect than all 3 with Irfan being the exception in ODI's.
Junaid was found out in SA, I expect BK to do much better in SA. It's what you do against the best that counts and not against SC teams who couldn't care less about test cricket. Despite his poor test average, I think BK did quite well against Australia and picked up some big wickets with the new ball and that's what you expect from your new ball bowlers. The thing is through the younger grades India are getting some decent bowlers who can support their world class batsmen. Pakistan aren't producing any more quality bowlers who can hide their batsmens decencies, I see India dominating Pakistan in all formats for the next 10 years because of this.BK is good for ODIs only due to 2 new ball rule
Junaid much better prospect if you consider all formats
Irfan also better than guys like YAdav, shami ahmed and Irfan...
Gul is a proven LOI performer much better than All Indian bowles bar BK
AS a complete package Pakistan Pace attack>> Indian PAce attack, though difference isnt as big as it was in yesteryears...
Just curious do Indian fans even get worried any more when facing Pakistan in a KO game?
Just curious do Indian fans even get worried any more when facing Pakistan in a KO game?
Junaid was found out in SA, I expect BK to do much better in SA. It's what you do against the best that counts and not against SC teams who couldn't care less about test cricket. Despite his poor test average, I think BK did quite well against Australia and picked up some big wickets with the new ball and that's what you expect from your new ball bowlers.
Trust me if you've seen the two bowl you'll know BK is the better prospect. Junaid is just heavily over rated on PP he is no where near the best bowlers in the world like some make him out to be.Got found out??
Played only one test match, and bowled pretty well in 1st innings , by 2nd innings we had already lost the match courtesy 49 all-out, he got injured in other two matches, so basically you are basing your opinion on 1 innings, Junaid did decently in ODIs
BK didnt do well against Aussies, he averaged in high 30's which is pretty average, Junaid's average is less than 30 in similar conditions, in tests being one trick poney doesnt work, to succeed in tests on e should know how to take wickets with old ball
Has any one here seen Rahul bat?
Trust me if you've seen the two bowl you'll know BK is the better prospect. Junaid is just heavily over rated on PP he is no where near the best bowlers in the world like some make him out to be.
Junaid was found out in SA, I expect BK to do much better in SA. It's what you do against the best that counts and not against SC teams who couldn't care less about test cricket. Despite his poor test average, I think BK did quite well against Australia and picked up some big wickets with the new ball and that's what you expect from your new ball bowlers. The thing is through the younger grades India are getting some decent bowlers who can support their world class batsmen. Pakistan aren't producing any more quality bowlers who can hide their batsmens decencies, I see India dominating Pakistan in all formats for the next 10 years because of this.
Seems a better prospect than Chand for 2015 tbhCopies Dravid. In his stance, technique, high elbow and even when he walks in to the wicket.
Just curious do Indian fans even get worried any more when facing Pakistan in a KO game?
I actually see BK troubling SA batsmen he's lethal with the new ball and can nick 2-3 off early, after that he's useless but he can still do some damage early on.What a load of tatti.
And SA is a much stronger team then AUS atm. Especially Aus in India and SA in SA.
Trust me if you've seen the two bowl you'll know BK is the better prospect. Junaid is just heavily over rated on PP he is no where near the best bowlers in the world like some make him out to be.
Pakistan cricket is at a cross roads, they no longer have the bowlers or magic to win games against the top teams.
I wouldn't hold my breath Pakistan's bowlers aren't that good.In age group cricket, across the years, most of Ind-Pak matches have been very closely fought irrespective of how many runs side batting first has scored.
I expect Pakistan to fight back even in this match with only 122 more needed by us.
As of right now I'd say England, India and possibly Australia have the better bowling attacks.Ajmal, Junaid and IRfan have all done decently against Top teams, they do lack that magic to run through teams but together still one of the best LOI attacks in the world
I actually see BK troubling SA batsmen he's lethal with the new ball and can nick 2-3 off early, after that he's useless but he can still do some damage early on.
That doesn't matter if you have the opposition 3-4 down for under 20 in your first spell.In test matches, you are useless if you cant pose threat through out the day...
20 overs of new ball can be dealt with by leaving the ball, by Quality players like S.A. top order