What's new

Narendra Modi : Mega Discussion Thread

A grown up adult mentioning Undertaker and WWE in a political thread (WWE btw which very few aqal walay watch anymore considering how laughable and childish its become) and I am the one in my room. :91:

You completely failed to get the point initially. :moyo
 
Where will he go next ?? Antarctica ?

This reminds us when Hitler got so many crowds turning up in Germany.
 
If there is a case registered in Pakistan against Modi for his involvement in Gujrat massacre, then Modi can be arrested in Pakistan and face the justice.

Pakistan has no jurisdiction over the Gujarat state of India.

God, do you folks do anything other than whinge about this day and night?
 
He probably would get such a crowd everywhere in the world even in Pakistan. He is the most charismatic leader with impressive resume in the world today

Not many PM's have a murder of 2000 ethnic minority on the resume.

Unique indeed :moyo
 
The world adores Modi. Americans, Arabs, Chinese, Britons all alike and its just a matter of time before Pakistanis become fan of our Bajrangi Bhaijaan Prime Minister.

SC muslims know the real murderer called Modi.

Rest of the World haven't had to deal with that murderer.
 
If there is a case registered in Pakistan against Modi for his involvement in Gujrat massacre, then Modi can be arrested in Pakistan and face the justice.
Lol.Case registered for what?When did Gujurat became a province of Pakistan?

And arrest a visiting head of state?Thats akin to declaration of war.LoL
 
All these Modi threads are spoiling my modi.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
 
Nothing can beat any Chinese President visit to Pakistan he always gets the best welcome in Pakistan from public and goverment. Even the USA president can't enjoy a welcome like that in Pakistan :P

Security situation is not good these days so it's not allowed otherwise i still remember how public use to come on roads to welcome chinese president.

From recent visit:

Pakistan Air Force JF-17 escorting Chinese President

protocol.jpg


Capital Islamabad

pak-china7.jpg

Look at that cop casually jay-walking.. :))
 
Modi will be the last great conqueror of India he will conquer Pakistan and akhand bharat will be restored after 3000 years.
 
In the recent times , Modi has been welcomed with open arms in every country that he has visited . Prior to him getting elected , there was a reasonable opposition towards him visiting certain countries but all of it has mellowed down after he became the PM and every country has been rolling down red carpets to welcome the Indian Prime Minister.

Pakistan is one country where Modi has been one of the most hated figures for his alleged role in Godhra Massacre of Muslims . The Politicians , Civil Servants , Religious Leaders and common public had a very negative view of him right from the beginning and things got worse as he went on to become the PM.

So , my question is how will Modi's visit to Pakistan be seen among Pakistanis ? Will some of the public and religious leaders protest ? Will there even be a danger to his life ? Will there be some opposition ?

Modi will visit Pakistan during the 2016 SAARC Summit.

We are not inviting Butcher of Hindustan to our country.
 
Modi will be the last great conqueror of India he will conquer Pakistan and akhand bharat will be restored after 3000 years.

Hahahaha that was funny.. :)))

Some of you Indians have real comedic talent..
 
Pakistan should give him the best welcome possible. He is a great leader of the largest democracy in the world.

His visit to Pakistan will only help to increase his popularity in the world as his visit will be shown repeatedly in every news channel in the world.

Despite his involvement in any massacre in India he should be given the best welcome possible for the good of both nations.

Those who are suggesting that he might be arrested on arrival to Pakistan must be high on something.
 
LOL. Whose this Swara Bhaskar ? ( Really dont know ). You are comparing Modi who already has the image of anti-muslim bigot to a nobody .

She's an actress.

And she's no exception : Indians have always been welcomed warmly in Pakistan, see what Ganguly had to say on how no one would take money from Indian cricketers. Modi will probably not roam around and visit shops, but I really doubt that there'll be some huge rally. Probably some failed attempt by an Islamist party but nothing more.

In fact, do the "average" Pakistani (totally different from the internet troll) associates Modi with "butchering Muslims" ? Despite the Urdu press, they'll perhaps just see him as what he is : the Indian head of state.

Nothing can beat any Chinese President visit to Pakistan he always gets the best welcome in Pakistan from public and goverment. Even the USA president can't enjoy a welcome like that in Pakistan :P

Security situation is not good these days so it's not allowed otherwise i still remember how public use to come on roads to welcome chinese president.

That "friendship" is quite artificial and totally dependent on the current geo-political script to be honest.
President Ayyub Khan was welcomed like a Hollywood star (and earned such accolades from the local press) during his US visit, when during the Cold War Pakistan began to become the America's servant, and we all know how fragile the "friendship" euphoria really is :

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/R7HwKD3XGUU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Only with India it can go deeper because of centuries-old ethnic and cultural ties. Sadly the Pak establishment (army-ISI nexus) has other plans.
 
She's an actress.

And she's no exception : Indians have always been welcomed warmly in Pakistan, see what Ganguly had to say on how no one would take money from Indian cricketers. Modi will probably not roam around and visit shops, but I really doubt that there'll be some huge rally. Probably some failed attempt by an Islamist party but nothing more.

In fact, do the "average" Pakistani (totally different from the internet troll) associates Modi with "butchering Muslims" ? Despite the Urdu press, they'll perhaps just see him as what he is : the Indian head of state.



That "friendship" is quite artificial and totally dependent on the current geo-political script to be honest.
President Ayyub Khan was welcomed like a Hollywood star (and earned such accolades from the local press) during his US visit, when during the Cold War Pakistan began to become the America's servant, and we all know how fragile the "friendship" euphoria really is :

Yes i remember the welcome Ayub received on his visit to US. TBH there are no real friends in politics it all depends on what you can gain and what is best for you. China need Pakistan and Pakistan need China they both know it. Friendly relations between India and Pakistan are never going to happen because of the history attached and we sub continent people are too emotional. We are not germans or japanese so moving on from past is not in our blood unfortunately thats a bitter truth. Maybe things change after a few decades but i don't see it happening any time soon.
 
Nothing can beat any Chinese President visit to Pakistan he always gets the best welcome in Pakistan from public and goverment. Even the USA president can't enjoy a welcome like that in Pakistan :P

The problem with the Pak-USA relationship is that the Pakistani people has never accepted it and they never will. In Pakistan, these judgements stem over issues irrelevant to Pakistan like Palestine. It's not something new either, Pakistanis have always treated the ennemies to their national interests like family and their true allies like strangers. Who can forget the pakistani love for Nasser all the while he was undermining the northern tier in middle east. Then that love carried on to current arab nations.
 
Modi meets all the characteristics of a cult leader. Hopefully the world is keeping a close eye on him.
 
Again this rockstar pseudonym :D

Rock music; All this howling and crying without any soul, rhythm and decency.
 
Pakistan has no jurisdiction over the Gujarat state of India.

God, do you folks do anything other than whinge about this day and night?

Lol.Case registered for what?When did Gujurat became a province of Pakistan?

And arrest a visiting head of state?Thats akin to declaration of war.LoL
I think the role Modi played in Gujarat massacre falls under "crimes against humanity" category. SIF would be more knowledgeable to shed light on this angle; but deliberate massacre of innocent minorities with the help of state machinery is almost always a crime against humanity.
 
Any other Indian here deeply disturbed by this extreme worshiping of Modi like he's some pariah of sorts? I don't get it.
 
All this fuss about Modi's 'rockstar' status is a little misleading. The world doesn't care about Modi, it cares about the Indian prime minister. To call Modi charismatic might be true as far as domestic politics is concerned but on the international stage he is no where close to charismatic. Even if the PM of India is the devil himself, the world will still give him a 'rockstar' welcome because India is a hugely important country on the world stage no matter what we in Pakistan might think. The only difference between Modi and former Indian leaders like Monmohan Singh is that while the later was a highly educated, modest and polished person, Modi comes from a humble background and likes to flaunt his status like an upstart. Modi is the Kohli to Manmohan or Vajpayees' Dravid.
 
Maybe he'll be treated like the leader of Xinjiang what ever country that guy is from. [emoji6]
 
Hmm not sure why Chinese citizens are "worshipping" him so much don't they know about Gujarat!
 
The problem with the Pak-USA relationship is that the Pakistani people has never accepted it and they never will. In Pakistan, these judgements stem over issues irrelevant to Pakistan like Palestine. It's not something new either, Pakistanis have always treated the ennemies to their national interests like family and their true allies like strangers. Who can forget the pakistani love for Nasser all the while he was undermining the northern tier in middle east. Then that love carried on to current arab nations.

I think the problem with Pak Usa relationship is that USA was never loyal to us as well. It used Pakistan and threw away its support when Pakistan needed it. Compare it to russia's support for india.
 
The world adores Modi. Americans, Arabs, Chinese, Britons all alike and its just a matter of time before Pakistanis become fan of our Bajrangi Bhaijaan Prime Minister.

The world adores modi so much that USA had modi on terrorist list and have had banned him from entering USA before he became India's PM after they removed it for 'interests' purposes.
 
I think the problem with Pak Usa relationship is that USA was never loyal to us as well. It used Pakistan and threw away its support when Pakistan needed it. Compare it to russia's support for india.

Except that during the Cold War it's the US that were more interested in going to war for Pakistan than USSR for India, despite Pakistan often being the agressor. It's true that you could simply attribute that to Pakistan being weaker than India.

The relationship only started to deteriorate after the cold war (if you ignore the years of socialist bhutto), partly because the U.S. didn't need Pakistan to contain communism anymore but that doesn't change the fact that they were the biggest pakistani ally during the cold war yet Pakistan's two minds about them didn't allow the pakistanis to take full advantage of their support in the Kashmir issue.

Even on the nuclear programme, just compare what is happening with Iran to how US dealt with Pakistan. They built nuclear reactors in Pakistan during the 60s and were unofficially complicit in the nuclear programme during the 80s, both of which could be argue to have played a role in the eventual nuclear status of Pakistan. Again, it all went sour after the end of the cold war but, in this instance, Pakistan got what they wanted by then.

Pakistan also had mutual defense treaties both unofficial (with the U.S.) and official one with the UK, which, iirc, was not the case for India and Russia.

Also, you can't ignore that the US won the cold war and Russia lost. Russia was in no position to ignore India after the war while the US had the whole world at their feet.

In short, I think that the US did more for Pakistan than Russia for India.
 
Last edited:
Any other Indian here deeply disturbed by this extreme worshiping of Modi like he's some pariah of sorts? I don't get it.

We Pakistanis generally believe it is due to his RSS and Hindutva nourishing, and strong nationalistic hard line tendencies.

But some Indians here say that they adore him because he proved himself an able statesman as CM Gujarat, has the potential to transform Indian economy and stature in the world and some also say that it is because of corrupt Congress that they prefer him.

Perhaps, you being an Indian can present a neutral case on the rise of Modi?
 
We Pakistanis generally believe it is due to his RSS and Hindutva nourishing, and strong nationalistic hard line tendencies.

But some Indians here say that they adore him because he proved himself an able statesman as CM Gujarat, has the potential to transform Indian economy and stature in the world and some also say that it is because of corrupt Congress that they prefer him.

Perhaps, you being an Indian can present a neutral case on the rise of Modi?
While there are multiple reasons for Indians loving Modi the mains ones yiu listed.

I still dont understand whether Modi is RSS or Hindutva supporter it has nothing to do with Pakistan unless ofcourse its hatred for all things Hindu.Modi isnt going to change anything in Pakistan.Whatever he will do will be inside the boundary of his country or diplomacy in other countries.Pakistan has nothing to do with him.They can choose to ignore him.
 
What's he singing ? The house version of Jai Hind?

I doubt 70,000 Indians will be a Wembley in freezing November to listen to this rockstar.
 
I'd like to see him belt out Joan Jett's iconic "I love rock 'n roll - put another rupee in the juke box baby" :113:
 
We Pakistanis generally believe it is due to his RSS and Hindutva nourishing, and strong nationalistic hard line tendencies.

and you Pakistanis are wrong.

It is not Modi who is nourishing the RSS and Hindutva. It is the other way around.

Modi could have never become PM if the RSS did not want him to.

But some Indians here say that they adore him because he proved himself an able statesman as CM Gujarat, has the potential to transform Indian economy and stature in the world and some also say that it is because of corrupt Congress that they prefer him.

That is indeed true.

The one thing almost every Indian wanted was the ouster of the corrupt and dynastic Congress party.

The BJP/RSS sensed the mood and propped up Modi, who they felt would be a popular choice among the youngsters in particular, thanks to the development he brought about in Gujarat. So they put him up as PM candidate, and you know the rest.

The fact is that the BJP would have won the election even if they had promoted a donkey as the candidate for the PM. They are the only viable national alternative to the Congress in India now.
 
Why are Pakistanis so obsessed with Modi?

Because it's fascinating to Know a right wing nutcase like Modi could get elected. That too after he gave the green light for his goons to slaughter men, women and children in his state.

Moral of the story Crime pays ?
 
Why not give a similar amount of attention to Saddam Hussein (when he was alive), Basher Al Assad, Colonel Gadaffi (who your national stadium is named after).

If the forum was flooded with Iraqi and Libyan trol...err...members then no doubt we would end up in lively debates with them about both leaders. As it is we don't have any Chinese members to discuss about China, or Swiss members to discuss about Switzerland, and so on.
 
Why not give a similar amount of attention to Saddam Hussein (when he was alive), Basher Al Assad, Colonel Gadaffi (who your national stadium is named after).

They have been criticised thousands of times and infact your example is pathetic because they were Not right wing goons like Modi but secular nationalists that were never voted in but held onto power for decades without letting any religious group prosper.

So try harder next time.
 
The one thing almost every Indian wanted was the ouster of the corrupt and dynastic Congress party.

that's why he got mammoth 30% votes.

The world adores Modi. Americans, Arabs, Chinese, Britons all alike and its just a matter of time before Pakistanis become fan of our Bajrangi Bhaijaan Prime Minister.

and Delhi'ites rejected BJP, Modi and Amit Shah.

He probably would get such a crowd everywhere in the world even in Pakistan. He is the most charismatic leader with impressive resume in the world today

What's impressive in his resume?

Hmm not sure why Chinese citizens are "worshipping" him so much don't they know about Gujarat!

China has launched its own "war on terror."
 
Because it's fascinating to Know a right wing nutcase like Modi could get elected. That too after he gave the green light for his goons to slaughter men, women and children in his state. Moral of the story Crime pays ?

He thrives in BIMARU (clean sweep in Rajasthan/Madhya Pradesh) states of India, poverty ridden people were shown big Suupnay.

India has 25+ states, what happens in one state hardly has any impact on other states. Gandhi's were voted to power after state sponsored genocide of minority Sikhs.

Congress is also responsible for stardom of Modi, they made him so big during election campaigns. Congress alleged Modi will take India to war with Pakistan if elected. That's what many timid Indians wanted to hear, we need a study in sub-continent on why desi's love likes of Indira, Zia, Modi.
 
Words for local consumption.

Minorities like Sikhs and Hindus thrived in Saddam's Iraq and Gadaffi's Libya. Saddam built a Gurudwara for Sikhs. I know many Indian families who went to Libya and Iraq with nothing and made it big.

That's what I tried to educate this thug Shamsher on.

Saddam was an awful dictator but He wasn't religious. In fact he had a very secular agenda and didn't allow Islamist ideology.
It was all Arab nationalism and he actually made Iraq one of the most educated countries in he Middle East.
His bizarre adventures into Iran and Kuwait was his downfall.
 
He thrives in BIMARU (clean sweep in Rajasthan/Madhya Pradesh) states of India, poverty ridden people were shown big Suupnay.

India has 25+ states, what happens in one state hardly has any impact on other states. Gandhi's were voted to power after state sponsored genocide of minority Sikhs.

Congress is also responsible for stardom of Modi, they made him so big during election campaigns. Congress alleged Modi will take India to war with Pakistan if elected. That's what many timid Indians wanted to hear, we need a study in sub-continent on why desi's love likes of Indira, Zia, Modi.

Its ok what you think.but its poor that you believe you know the thinking of millions of Indians who voted Modi.
 
Is he gonna play for Roy Hodgson in England's Euro 2016 qualifier ?

I heard Modi's good on the right wing...
 
If there is a case registered in Pakistan against Modi for his involvement in Gujrat massacre, then Modi can be arrested in Pakistan and face the justice.

:))..... diplomatic immunity is a biatch!!

By the way, Does Pakistani law even covers crimes committed by foreigners on foreign soil against foreigners??
Plz study the law!!
 
I think the role Modi played in Gujarat massacre falls under "crimes against humanity" category. SIF would be more knowledgeable to shed light on this angle; but deliberate massacre of innocent minorities with the help of state machinery is almost always a crime against humanity.

Again, which Pakistani law covers those crimes??
Its not within its jurisdiction dude!!
 
Maybe he'll be treated like the leader of Xinjiang what ever country that guy is from. [emoji6]

Ouch!!! Sorry our hate for oppressors of Muslim rights is limited our immediate east, beyond that its "love and brotherhood deeper than oceans higher than mountains"
 
Except that during the Cold War it's the US that were more interested in going to war for Pakistan than USSR for India, despite Pakistan often being the agressor. It's true that you could simply attribute that to Pakistan being weaker than India.

The relationship only started to deteriorate after the cold war (if you ignore the years of socialist bhutto), partly because the U.S. didn't need Pakistan to contain communism anymore but that doesn't change the fact that they were the biggest pakistani ally during the cold war yet Pakistan's two minds about them didn't allow the pakistanis to take full advantage of their support in the Kashmir issue.

Even on the nuclear programme, just compare what is happening with Iran to how US dealt with Pakistan. They built nuclear reactors in Pakistan during the 60s and were unofficially complicit in the nuclear programme during the 80s, both of which could be argue to have played a role in the eventual nuclear status of Pakistan. Again, it all went sour after the end of the cold war but, in this instance, Pakistan got what they wanted by then.

Pakistan also had mutual defense treaties both unofficial (with the U.S.) and official one with the UK, which, iirc, was not the case for India and Russia.

Also, you can't ignore that the US won the cold war and Russia lost. Russia was in no position to ignore India after the war while the US had the whole world at their feet.

In short, I think that the US did more for Pakistan than Russia for India.

What Russia did for India in 1971 was alone itself sufficient to break Pakistan in two parts. Let me know what America was smoking at that time.

I was pro Pak-America friendship but have grown to be indifferent seeing the attitude of distrust from both sides.
 
I think the role Modi played in Gujarat massacre falls under "crimes against humanity" category. SIF would be more knowledgeable to shed light on this angle; but deliberate massacre of innocent minorities with the help of state machinery is almost always a crime against humanity.

Pakistan doesnt have jurisdiction to decide anything on what happens in another sovereign state.you dont have the authority or the might to do that.

Secondly Pakistan cant arrest a head of a state,it will be declaring war againist India.
 
Except that during the Cold War it's the US that were more interested in going to war for Pakistan than USSR for India, despite Pakistan often being the agressor. It's true that you could simply attribute that to Pakistan being weaker than India.

The relationship only started to deteriorate after the cold war (if you ignore the years of socialist bhutto), partly because the U.S. didn't need Pakistan to contain communism anymore but that doesn't change the fact that they were the biggest pakistani ally during the cold war yet Pakistan's two minds about them didn't allow the pakistanis to take full advantage of their support in the Kashmir issue.

Even on the nuclear programme, just compare what is happening with Iran to how US dealt with Pakistan. They built nuclear reactors in Pakistan during the 60s and were unofficially complicit in the nuclear programme during the 80s, both of which could be argue to have played a role in the eventual nuclear status of Pakistan. Again, it all went sour after the end of the cold war but, in this instance, Pakistan got what they wanted by then.

Pakistan also had mutual defense treaties both unofficial (with the U.S.) and official one with the UK, which, iirc, was not the case for India and Russia.

Also, you can't ignore that the US won the cold war and Russia lost. Russia was in no position to ignore India after the war while the US had the whole world at their feet.

In short, I think that the US did more for Pakistan than Russia for India.

Just the bolded part.India and USSR and now India and Russia have a military treaty to assist each other by any and all means in case of a war.That threat is in existence since 70s.it was the USSR which prevented the US 7th fleet from entering the Indian Ocean by sending its nuclear Submarine fleet.
 
Pakistan doesnt have jurisdiction to decide anything on what happens in another sovereign state.you dont have the authority or the might to do that.

Secondly Pakistan cant arrest a head of a state,it will be declaring war againist India.

Lol, everyone be scared.

Pakistan will be declaring war if Modi gets arrested according to Indian internet warriors.
 
Lol, everyone be scared.

Pakistan will be declaring war if Modi gets arrested according to Indian internet warriors.

Yes you will be declaring war if you arrest the visiting head of state of a nation.Go and read the Vienna Convention.This is the reason why US/UK cant get into Ecuador embassy to get Assange.You cannot violate terms of the Vienna convention.

Arrest Modi.LOL.Kya khwaab hai logon ke. :))
 
Lol, everyone be scared.

Pakistan will be declaring war if Modi gets arrested according to Indian internet warriors.

Its an act of war , kid!!

You cannot violate diplomatic immunity of the head of visiting state in such a brash fashion,
not only that, It will be violation of international laws, for which infact Pakistan will be faced with much severe penalties. and that's why no sane person in power considers going ahead with such idiotic steps!!

Get yourself up to 50 MPH atleast!!
 
Yes you will be declaring war if you arrest the visiting head of state of a nation.Go and read the Vienna Convention.This is the reason why US/UK cant get into Ecuador embassy to get Assange.You cannot violate terms of the Vienna convention.

Arrest Modi.LOL.Kya khwaab hai logon ke. :))

he is basically 9 MPH ... thought since zero has no value.. added it to his number without thinking :P
 
Did anyone really not notice that Pakistan is misspelled as Pakisan in the title ???? :P :P

Epic troll on all posters!
 
He thrives in BIMARU (clean sweep in Rajasthan/Madhya Pradesh) states of India, poverty ridden people were shown big Suupnay.

India has 25+ states, what happens in one state hardly has any impact on other states. Gandhi's were voted to power after state sponsored genocide of minority Sikhs.

Congress is also responsible for stardom of Modi, they made him so big during election campaigns. Congress alleged Modi will take India to war with Pakistan if elected. That's what many timid Indians wanted to hear, we need a study in sub-continent on why desi's love likes of Indira, Zia, Modi.

Zia isn't popular here.
 
Just the bolded part.India and USSR and now India and Russia have a military treaty to assist each other by any and all means in case of a war.That threat is in existence since 70s.it was the USSR which prevented the US 7th fleet from entering the Indian Ocean by sending its nuclear Submarine fleet.

UK-Pakistan mutual defense was mostly in the 60s, not the 70s where it was nominal at best, while the USSR-India treaty was created specifically due to the looming Pak-India war in 1971 (with Pak-USA-China forming a dangerous triangle both for India and Soviets, prompting the treaty).
 
Lol, back to your favourite topic of Muslim birth rates.

Gaddafi was a goon biut he wasn't religious or had any religious agenda.
Secondly he was never voted in.

Modii not just a right wing goon but his hands are dripping with blood of thousands yet he got voted in.

Now get off your high horse and stop preaching about secular society when the reality is different. And you have been exposed on this as well - a closet BJP thug.

You are on a roll mate. I suspect you have found a job at some cemetery because this was some epic burial of shamsheer birth rate. :))
 
Lol, back to your favourite topic of Muslim birth rates.

Gaddafi was a goon biut he wasn't religious or had any religious agenda.
Secondly he was never voted in.

Modii not just a right wing goon but his hands are dripping with blood of thousands yet he got voted in.

Now get off your high horse and stop preaching about secular society when the reality is different. And you have been exposed on this as well - a closet BJP thug.
1.Again.You calling an Indian murderer holds no value to Indians.Indian courts cleared him.
2.Indian secularism is enshrined in its constitution which gives equal rights to all.No Modi can take it away.

3.Who India votes is concern of Indians only.And if an Indian PM is so disliked by anti India elements then i guess he is doing something right l.
 
1.Again.You calling an Indian murderer holds no value to Indians.Indian courts cleared him.
2.Indian secularism is enshrined in its constitution which gives equal rights to all.No Modi can take it away.

3.Who India votes is concern of Indians only.And if an Indian PM is so disliked by anti India elements then i guess he is doing something right l.

Blah blah Blah.

1. Modi is a right wing Hindu fanatic that got voted in despite massacring thousands.

2. Secular this, secular that but the ground realities are different. Right wing Hindu groups have big control of cities like Gujarat and Mumbai.

3. Sure India can vote in a murderer should they wish but just because It does it doesn't make it look any better. At least the Middle East dictators were never voted in - tried to educate your BJP brother Shamaher on this.

4. If corrupt Kangaroo Indian courts cleared Modi then good for him but that doesn't mean he is innocent, a murderer and a thug will never become a saint.

There you go, I made 4 points against your 3. Now come back and make 5.
 
Last edited:
Blah blah Blah.

1. Modi is a right wing Hindu fanatic that got voted in despite massacring thousands.

2. Secular this, secular that but the ground realities are different. Right wing Hindu groups have big control of cities like Gujarat and Mumbai.

3. Sure India can vote in a murderer should they wish but just because It does it doesn't make it look any better. At least the Middle East dictators were never voted in - tried to educate your BJP brother Shamaher on this.

4. If corrupt Kangaroo Indian courts cleared Modi then good for him but that doesn't mean he is innocent, a murderer and a thug will never become a saint.

There you go, I made 4 points against your 3. Now come back and make 5.

Just checked online...BJP's bedfellows shiv sena have a few seats in Lok sohba or whatever the hell it is and garnered 10 MILLION VOTES.
 
Wow, Indians are actually supporting this guy out of nationalism :facepalm: How can you be so proud of this guy or do you have to support him in your bid to one up your neighbours just because they don't like him LOL show some humanity, look at what's happening in your country
 
Last edited:
Wow, Indians are actually supporting this guy out of nationalism :facepalm: How can you be so proud of this guy or do you have to support him in your bid to one up your neighbours just because they don't like him LOL show some humanity, look at what's happening in your country

Whats happening in India ? Well, last I checked 180 Million Muslims with along with 20 plus million Christians live there . How is your minorities in Pakistan doing ?
 
Whats happening in India ? Well, last I checked 180 Million Muslims with along with 20 plus million Christians live there . How is your minorities in Pakistan doing ?

So all you have for your argument is the number of people living there.

Wah bhai wah :))
 
If the forum was flooded with Iraqi and Libyan trol...err...members then no doubt we would end up in lively debates with them about both leaders. As it is we don't have any Chinese members to discuss about China, or Swiss members to discuss about Switzerland, and so on.

So basically your logic is this isn't hypocrisy and a double standard it is actually that nothing can be discussed unless there is a significant population on these boards from those countries.

Please point me in the direction of all the Israeli and Palestinian users.
 
Back
Top