Indian_Supporter
First Class Player
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2015
- Runs
- 2,862
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
United India.What does Akhand mean?
United India.
United India.
Had a quick glance at Lance Price's book on Modi and found it fascinating on many levels.
Firstly, Modi's 2014 campaign was astonishingly impressive. He appeared at 5,857 events, many of them via holographic transmissions that had him addressing villagers live in 100 locations at once. His first national TV interview of the election campaign achieved the highest TV ratings in Indian history.
Then of course the book talked about Gujarat 2002. I understand why its still such a sore spot for so many Indians and Indian Muslims. Human Rights Watch did a report in May 2002 and found there was some forewarning of violence from within the police itself. Additional DG of police G. C. Raigar, had provided intelligence ahead of the Godhra incident that VHP volunteers were moving in and out of Gujarat and could instigate communal violence. He was removed from his post.
What I will say to Modi supporters who say "just get over it, it was 13 years ago" - you have to remember how bad the violence got. On February 28 at least 65 people were killed by a 5,000-strong mob that torched the entire locality within minutes. Women and girls were gang-raped in public view before being hacked and burned to death. You can't expect people to simply forget those things, and if one thought the Chief Minister of the state failed in his duty to protect his people, or worse was complicit in the violence then you can't expect them to simply move on and forgive him.
However Modi's relationship with Muslims is more complex than I thought looking at it from an outsider. One would think that after Gujarat, he'd be persona non-grata amongst Muslims. Not so.
In the town of Salaya in Jamnagar 90% of the population is Muslim. For the 27 seats at stake at the 2013 municipal elections, the BJP put up 24 Muslim candidates who were all successful and BJP governed the town for the first time. Congress which has won the town elections for decades did not win a single seat. There appears to be Muslim voters who are willing to look past 2002 and Modi's record of development has been a massive factor in his success.
Its a really informative book and definitely recommend it to everyone.
What did the book say about the burning of Hindus at Godhra?Had a quick glance at Lance Price's book on Modi and found it fascinating on many levels.
Firstly, Modi's 2014 campaign was astonishingly impressive. He appeared at 5,857 events, many of them via holographic transmissions that had him addressing villagers live in 100 locations at once. His first national TV interview of the election campaign achieved the highest TV ratings in Indian history.
Then of course the book talked about Gujarat 2002. I understand why its still such a sore spot for so many Indians and Indian Muslims. Human Rights Watch did a report in May 2002 and found there was some forewarning of violence from within the police itself. Additional DG of police G. C. Raigar, had provided intelligence ahead of the Godhra incident that VHP volunteers were moving in and out of Gujarat and could instigate communal violence. He was removed from his post.
What I will say to Modi supporters who say "just get over it, it was 13 years ago" - you have to remember how bad the violence got. On February 28 at least 65 people were killed by a 5,000-strong mob that torched the entire locality within minutes. Women and girls were gang-raped in public view before being hacked and burned to death. You can't expect people to simply forget those things, and if one thought the Chief Minister of the state failed in his duty to protect his people, or worse was complicit in the violence then you can't expect them to simply move on and forgive him.
However Modi's relationship with Muslims is more complex than I thought looking at it from an outsider. One would think that after Gujarat, he'd be persona non-grata amongst Muslims. Not so.
In the town of Salaya in Jamnagar 90% of the population is Muslim. For the 27 seats at stake at the 2013 municipal elections, the BJP put up 24 Muslim candidates who were all successful and BJP governed the town for the first time. Congress which has won the town elections for decades did not win a single seat. There appears to be Muslim voters who are willing to look past 2002 and Modi's record of development has been a massive factor in his success.
Its a really informative book and definitely recommend it to everyone.
What did the book say about the burning of Hindus at Godhra?
Had a quick glance at Lance Price's book on Modi and found it fascinating on many levels.
Firstly, Modi's 2014 campaign was astonishingly impressive. He appeared at 5,857 events, many of them via holographic transmissions that had him addressing villagers live in 100 locations at once. His first national TV interview of the election campaign achieved the highest TV ratings in Indian history.
Then of course the book talked about Gujarat 2002. I understand why its still such a sore spot for so many Indians and Indian Muslims. Human Rights Watch did a report in May 2002 and found there was some forewarning of violence from within the police itself. Additional DG of police G. C. Raigar, had provided intelligence ahead of the Godhra incident that VHP volunteers were moving in and out of Gujarat and could instigate communal violence. He was removed from his post.
What I will say to Modi supporters who say "just get over it, it was 13 years ago" - you have to remember how bad the violence got. On February 28 at least 65 people were killed by a 5,000-strong mob that torched the entire locality within minutes. Women and girls were gang-raped in public view before being hacked and burned to death. You can't expect people to simply forget those things, and if one thought the Chief Minister of the state failed in his duty to protect his people, or worse was complicit in the violence then you can't expect them to simply move on and forgive him.
However Modi's relationship with Muslims is more complex than I thought looking at it from an outsider. One would think that after Gujarat, he'd be persona non-grata amongst Muslims. Not so.
In the town of Salaya in Jamnagar 90% of the population is Muslim. For the 27 seats at stake at the 2013 municipal elections, the BJP put up 24 Muslim candidates who were all successful and BJP governed the town for the first time. Congress which has won the town elections for decades did not win a single seat. There appears to be Muslim voters who are willing to look past 2002 and Modi's record of development has been a massive factor in his success.
Its a really informative book and definitely recommend it to everyone.
No bro. It means undivided India.
A-khand� = uninterrupted, without break.
Khand means to "interrupt".
Pronunciation: A-khandd a in both instances has the sound of u in fund which rhymes with khand.
It can be used for Entire, Unbroken.
From the brief glance through the chapter he basically talked about how VHP volunteers had been going back and forth from Godhra train station to Ayodhya for weeks and trouble had been brewing with the local Muslims.
He didn't go into specifics or who was to blame but like I said, only had a brief chance to look through the book, I do want to know more details about the sequence of events which has been disputed.
First Indian PM to visit Ireland in 60 years.That's how insignificant you were to us.
PM Narendra Modi ‘best Indian leader since independence’, says Rupert Murdoch
http://indianexpress.com/article/in...nce-says-rupert-murdoch/#sthash.5Hm5NCKP.dpuf
Why does the world look at Modi totally different to the way some Pakistanis see him ?![]()
It's quite ironic modi the masskiller is being cheer by leprechauns, it was just a decade or two back the Irish were being oppressed by the English
What do you think is happening here ? You raise a valid point about the Irish being opressed and instead of being empathetic to the muslims they are embracing Modi. This seems to be a common trend, do you think the world doesnt take muslims seriously ?
Naaah, the world (the irish in this case) are just looking out for there personal interests, but you would expect an oppressed community to empathize with another oppressed one
Dont see how the Irish are oppressed in any way. Power sharing in Northern Ireland, peace in the island and overall a pretty decent place living wise.
Economically we're not doing great true, thats all the more reason to roll out the red carpet when the leader of a nation of 1.2 billion english speaking people arrives, especially when both nations invest a couple billion in each others economies, not to mention Ireland and India have historically been allies due to our combined efforts for independence. Hell India's 4th president V.V Giri was expelled from Ireland when he was a student studying law due to his involvement in the Easter Rising. Modi's role in the Gujarat riots is not our concern and is for other parties to uncover and solve.
And to be honest I dont think most people would even have known about the riots, I didnt until I signed up here.
Rupert Murdoch is a right wing nut who owns some of the most garbage media establishments in the UK. Having his endorsement while important to Modis portrayal in the media isnt exactly a glowing Character reference. India is an economic powerhouse of course western leaders will try buttering Modi up. A lot of Indian companies are keeping the manufacturing industry alive in many western countries e.g TATA. Makes sense for them to invite Modi over. Whatever happened to Gujarat is irrelevant. Western countries have been in bed with much worse people than Modi. Saddam Pinochet Mubarak etc a long line of mass murderers. And tbh outside of Pakistan and India the Gujarat riots are not that well known. General public in West have little knowledgr of it nor do they care.PM Narendra Modi ‘best Indian leader since independence’, says Rupert Murdoch
http://indianexpress.com/article/in...nce-says-rupert-murdoch/#sthash.5Hm5NCKP.dpuf
Why does the world look at Modi totally different to the way some Pakistanis see him ?![]()
Modi could go down in history as the greatest and most popular politician of all time.
Dont see how the Irish are oppressed in any way. Power sharing in Northern Ireland, peace in the island and overall a pretty decent place living wise.
Economically we're not doing great true, thats all the more reason to roll out the red carpet when the leader of a nation of 1.2 billion english speaking people arrives, especially when both nations invest a couple billion in each others economies, not to mention Ireland and India have historically been allies due to our combined efforts for independence. Hell India's 4th president V.V Giri was expelled from Ireland when he was a student studying law due to his involvement in the Easter Rising. Modi's role in the Gujarat riots is not our concern and is for other parties to uncover and solve.
And to be honest I dont think most people would even have known about the riots, I didnt until I signed up here.
Modi could go down in history as the greatest and most unpopular politician of all time.
Only among terroristsModi could go down in history as the greatest and most popular politician of all time.
...The greatest ever ?
Move over FDR, Churchill, Attlee, Lincoln, Washington, Lee Yuan Kew, Mandela, JFK. I mean what did they ever do ?
CORRECTION!
Modi could go down in history as the most unpopular politician of all time like Hitler by mainly muslims.
.
Corrected... Also Ayub Khan takes the example from Hitler, hang your head in shame..
Do you know your history?
For future reference say Yahya Khan or GEneral Niazi so that you can make your point without looking foolish
Modi could go down in history as the greatest and most popular politician of all time.
Correct my bad, I meant to say Agha Khan...
wrong again lol
Jiyee Khalistan![]()
Last I checked, Agha Muhammad Yahya Khan was in charge till part of Pakistan became Bangladesh...
sikhs are a non entity they have no power, just wet dreams of Nri sikhs.
You dnt knw anything about sikhs...so should not have anything to say on this topic
Last time they rose up Zia ul haq backed them with weapons, despite their holy place being bombed the sikh population didn't rise up and the few that did were killed, or fled abroad it's obvious that the average sikh doesn't care about khalistan.
MODS please merge this with the Narendra Modi Mega Thread.Thank You
[MENTION=138379]#GreenRoars[/MENTION]
Like Pakistan trying to seperate Kashmir for eternity but still couldnt do a jackKhalistan Zindabad!
Everybody wanna separate from India man!
oh my bad. I thought you meant Agha Khan - as in the Agha Khan
Yea thats his full name but he is referred as Yahya Khan always.
Whenever you meet a Khalistani, just utter one name and see him go crying to mommy -
KPS Gill![]()
Khalistan Zindabad!
Everybody wanna separate from India man!
He should have been sent to Kashmir to teach the beghairat brigade of separatists a lesson.
Punjabi's hate Punjab state government more than Indian Central government.
Punjabi's don't have a single credible political leader.
Congress and Akali/BJP alliance are ruling the state by rotation. New player AAP has no credibility, too fickle.
if India does hold a referendum in Punjab I can pretty much say with surety tht the Khalistan movement will be routed and then even the die hards will not be able to raise it up ever again. Unlike Kashmir where there is a likelihood of India losing out in a referendum no such threat exists in Punjab
Last time Sikh politics was relevant and fought for genuine social cause was before Bhindranwale movement started. Post Bhindranwale, the sikhs have got divided and drifted way off track. While we should have debated development and education, we debated the security of khalsa from 80s to as long as the last decade which is a total shame. I'm glad the khalsa in danger BS has somewhat died out in recent times and more and more Punjabis have started questioning the sincerity of Akalis and other so called sikh leaders. The akal takht, shromani gurdwara committee i'm sorry to say, while happen to be top sikh establishments are all a massive joke and have never raised proper issues at the national forum rather than bickering about khalsa in danger BS.
From one of the most influential and powerful states in the 60s and 70s Punjab has turned into one of the least influential and slowest in terms of development. If only the rural sikh youth had cared about education and development rather than wasting it all on stupid khalistan cause.
You are insinuating Sikhs fully back Akali Dal, which is totally wrong. Akali's have given tickets to Hindus and Muslims and they have won.
It's the Punjab Congress and Captain Amrinder Singh who wants Akali's to debate on 1984. Captain has always maintained that Badal betrayed Sant Harchand Singh Longowal. Badal never made any remark on 1984. Badal is most hated by Khalistanis, watch treatment of Akali leaders on Youtube.
It's the Sikhs who voted for AAP, they won in Moga/Ludhiana/Sangur/Patiala. Malwa region of Punjab, Jatt land.
Religion plays no role in Punjab elections, number of seats won by non-Sikhs on Akali tickets is a testament to that.
It is Badal's Akali Dal, his personal property not the Shiromani Akali Dal of yesteryears.