What's new

"Operation Sindoor is now India's new policy against terrorism, a new line has been drawn": Narendra Modi

The fact that he has quoted a random number without any proofs itself is questionable. Rafael is a massive jet...1 down made such a big news in French and Global media. If you think if 5 were down, no one apart from Subramaniam swamy will question it? LOL. Any sensible Indian will question his statement and from where he is getting that number. I can only see Pakistanis and you are taking his quote as face value. Wonder why?

:rabada2
Rafael or Rafale? Did he say that five Rafales were down? No, he said five jets were down. People like you didn't even believe that one jet was down on May 7th. Aur gaddar apne pyo ko bol, jo tujhe India se bhaga ke England le gaya. :inti
 
Did he say that five Rafales were down? No, he said five jets were down. People like you didn't even believe that one jet was down on May 7th. Aur gaddar apne pyo ko bol, jo tujhe India se bhaga ke England le gaya. :inti
LOL I have said on 7th itself here that 1 Rafael jet was down in the thread opened by Major. Even if 5 jets were down, as a responsible Indian...you should be asking from him the proof of it and not towing the line of Pakistanis here. Then act surprised when people call you Gaddar.

:rabada2
 
LOL I have said on 7th itself here that 1 Rafael jet was down in the thread opened by Major. Even if 5 jets were down, as a responsible Indian...you should be asking from him the proof of it and not towing the line of Pakistanis here. Then act surprised when people call you Gaddar.

:rabada2
So I am allowed to ask for proof that five jets were downed but I can't ask for proof of Pakistan's involvement in the attack? Andhbhakht logic. And someone who ran away from the country himself should be the last person to call someone still living here a traitor. We call people like you 'thaali ka baingan'. :rabada2 :inti
 
So I am allowed to ask for proof that five jets were downed but I can't ask for proof of Pakistan's involvement in the attack? Andhbhakht logic. And someone who ran away from the country himself should be the last person to call someone still living here a traitor. We call people like you 'thaali ka baingan'. :rabada2 :inti
Leaving the country legally for better livelihood overseas is not gaddari...LMAO. However, staying in a country but siding with enemy nation is. Then again, I thought this should be obvious.

Why are you asking me for proof? Considering the history of India and Pakistan and how Pakistan tried to do terrorism in India for last 3 decades, one can easily take a calculated guess which country was behind Pahalgam. You need not be rocket scientist.

However, you seem to be quoting Subramaniam Swamy multiple times. So one can expect as a sensible Indian you would rather questioning him from where he is getting the numbers rather that taking it as a facevalue and siding with Pakistanis.
 
Leaving the country legally for better livelihood overseas is not gaddari...LMAO. However, staying in a country but siding with enemy nation is. Then again, I thought this should be obvious.

Why are you asking me for proof? Considering the history of India and Pakistan and how Pakistan tried to do terrorism in India for last 3 decades, one can easily take a calculated guess which country was behind Pahalgam. You need not be rocket scientist.

However, you seem to be quoting Subramaniam Swamy multiple times. So one can expect as a sensible Indian you would rather questioning him from where he is getting the numbers rather that taking it as a facevalue and siding with Pakistanis.

He’s more Indian than you’ll ever be, because he’s asking the hard questions that actually matter. Meanwhile, you’ve reduced yourself to parroting whatever propaganda spills out of the Butcher of Gujarat’s echo chamber.

Standing up to domestic religious extremism isn’t optional, it’s a constitutional and moral responsibility for every Indian. Hiding behind economic stats to justify electing bigots isn’t patriotism, it’s cowardice in disguise.
 
Leaving the country legally for better livelihood overseas is not gaddari...LMAO. However, staying in a country but siding with enemy nation is. Then again, I thought this should be obvious.

Why are you asking me for proof? Considering the history of India and Pakistan and how Pakistan tried to do terrorism in India for last 3 decades, one can easily take a calculated guess which country was behind Pahalgam. You need not be rocket scientist.

However, you seem to be quoting Subramaniam Swamy multiple times. So one can expect as a sensible Indian you would rather questioning him from where he is getting the numbers rather that taking it as a facevalue and siding with Pakistanis.
So, just because I ask questions, I am suddenly siding with an enemy nation? Meanwhile, people like you who left India for a better life and now act ultra-patriotic from abroad are the real nationalists? Oh, cut the cr@p.

You can't use evidence from the previous attacks to justify actions in 2025. That's not how logic or accountability works.

And I only brought up your Swamy guy because he is from your beloved BJP. If even his words don't convince you, then who will? Use some common sense.

And why should I be the one asking him for proof? You should be questioning him, he is the one casually claiming five jets were downed, while making a mockery of people like you who are busy fighting social media wars for India but from the comfort of England. :kp :inti
 
He’s more Indian than you’ll ever be, because he’s asking the hard questions that actually matter. Meanwhile, you’ve reduced yourself to parroting whatever propaganda spills out of the Butcher of Gujarat’s echo chamber.

Standing up to domestic religious extremism isn’t optional, it’s a constitutional and moral responsibility for every Indian. Hiding behind economic stats to justify electing bigots isn’t patriotism, it’s cowardice in disguise.
Nah not true at all and I disagree. India is a multi party democracy and anyone has the right to support any political party or leader. However, 24*7 being a critic of a country in every field and towing the line of Pakistan is gaddari. As I said before, in this war, I have seen every Indian, Modi supporter or his hater, everyone was unanimously standing with govt except this guy.

Also, why are you bringing religious extremism into this discussion. Everyone must stand against religious extremism and no one will call you gaddar for it. Intentionally acting ignorant or today is a special day?
 
Nah not true at all and I disagree. India is a multi party democracy and anyone has the right to support any political party or leader. However, 24*7 being a critic of a country in every field and towing the line of Pakistan is gaddari. As I said before, in this war, I have seen every Indian, Modi supporter or his hater, everyone was unanimously standing with govt except this guy.

Also, why are you bringing religious extremism into this discussion. Everyone must stand against religious extremism and no one will call you gaddar for it. Intentionally acting ignorant or today is a special day?
The Butcher of Gujrat, known as Modi ji, is a religious extremists.

Try not to forget this important fact, if you had remember then you wouldn't have typed up whatever that is you typed up.
 
The Butcher of Gujrat, known as Modi ji, is a religious extremists.

Try not to forget this important fact, if you had remember then you wouldn't have typed up whatever that is you typed up.
Critic of Modi and hater of a country are two completely different thing.

Btw, he is only known as Butcher of Gujarat among your fellow. No one out of that echo chamber calls him that.

:kp
 
Nah not true at all and I disagree. India is a multi party democracy and anyone has the right to support any political party or leader. However, 24*7 being a critic of a country in every field and towing the line of Pakistan is gaddari. As I said before, in this war, I have seen every Indian, Modi supporter or his hater, everyone was unanimously standing with govt except this guy.

Also, why are you bringing religious extremism into this discussion. Everyone must stand against religious extremism and no one will call you gaddar for it. Intentionally acting ignorant or today is a special day?
The so called 24*7 critic is still living in his country even though he has an option to live abroad but the so called nationalist is hiding in the UK and showing his fake support for India. :yk :inti
 
Critic of Modi and hater of a country are two completely different thing.

Btw, he is only known as Butcher of Gujarat among your fellow. No one out of that echo chamber calls him that.

:kp
Most people in the West only know what they’ve been told—or they choose to overlook the facts for business and profit. But facts don’t change, in the subcontinent, he’s still known as the Butcher of Gujarat.


And every time you respond with “haters” or “jealous,” you remind of this guy.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
Most people in the West only know what they’ve been told—or they choose to overlook the facts for business and profit. But facts don’t change, in the subcontinent, he’s still known as the Butcher of Gujarat.


And every time you respond with “haters” or “jealous,” you remind of this guy.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Let’s set aside what the West thinks and focus on the subcontinent.

Indians living in India voted him into power three times as their prime minister, through democratic process and with strong mandates.

The Indian Supreme Court and its SIT (Special Investigation Team) have given him a clean chit regarding the Gujarat riots.

Only Pakistanis & Bangladeshis and our resident call him Butcher of Gujarat. It’s not a view held widely or officially, especially after judicial scrutiny has cleared him.


Modi or no Modi.

:kp
 
Let’s set aside what the West thinks and focus on the subcontinent.

Indians living in India voted him into power three times as their prime minister, through democratic process and with strong mandates.

The Indian Supreme Court and its SIT (Special Investigation Team) have given him a clean chit regarding the Gujarat riots.

Only Pakistanis & Bangladeshis and our resident call him Butcher of Gujarat. It’s not a view held widely or officially, especially after judicial scrutiny has cleared him.


Modi or no Modi.

:kp
Ahh, that is the point, Indian voting for religious extremists to represent them. Duh!
 
The so called 24*7 critic is still living in his country even though he has an option to live abroad but the so called nationalist is hiding in the UK and showing his fake support for India. :yk :inti
Living in a country doesn’t automatically make someone loyal to it. History shows us that some of the most well-known traitors — like Jaychand, Mir Jafar, and Vibhishan have betrayed from within. I’m not directly comparing you to them, but simply pointing out that betrayal isn’t always from the outside.

There are hundreds of Indian users on this platform across the political spectrum, both Modi supporters and critics and nearly all of them seem to share a similar view about your posts. Many even question whether you're truly Indian, given your consistent and often blind defence of Pakistan across topics.

However, I know you are an Indian muslim from Delhi, which makes your stance even more surprising to me (or perhaps not?)

Anyway, koi nei... happy posting. Atleast you make the place here interesting.

:kp
 
Ahh, that is the point, Indian voting for religious extremists to represent them. Duh!
Millions of Indians voted for Modi, not once, not twice but three times. Are you saying all those people deliberately voted him because he is a religious extremist and not for any other reason?

Wah re Pakistani :yk
 
Millions of Indians voted for Modi, not once, not twice but three times. Are you saying all those people deliberately voted him because he is a religious extremist and not for any other reason?

Wah re Pakistani :yk
I don’t claim to know millions of people from India, but we all know who Modi is. He’s shown us, time and time again, through his own words and actions.

And that’s exactly the point, millions voted for a man infamous for being a bigoted religious extremist. That speaks volumes, not just about him, but about the direction those voters are willing to take their country.

Millions voting for him does not make him less of a bigot? does it?
 
I don’t claim to know millions of people from India, but we all know who Modi is. He’s shown us, time and time again, through his own words and actions.

And that’s exactly the point, millions voted for a man infamous for being a bigoted religious extremist. That speaks volumes, not just about him, but about the direction those voters are willing to take their country.

Millions voting for him does not make him less of a bigot? does it?
When a leader is elected by a large majority, not just once, but re-elected with an even greater mandate, and then chosen again for a third term , it clearly indicates that he is doing something right for the country. Millions of voters across India, from all age groups, genders, and financial backgrounds, have supported him for reasons that resonate with them.

What’s amusing is watching you throw your toys out of the pram and question the intelligence of Indian voters, as if their democratic choice somehow needs your validation.
 
When a leader is elected by a large majority, not just once, but re-elected with an even greater mandate, and then chosen again for a third term , it clearly indicates that he is doing something right for the country. Millions of voters across India, from all age groups, genders, and financial backgrounds, have supported him for reasons that resonate with them.

What’s amusing is watching you throw your toys out of the pram and question the intelligence of Indian voters, as if their democratic choice somehow needs your validation.

Why would anyone need validation from those who can’t even vote for Modi? That’s not a counterargument, that’s a deflection.

Criticism of Modi’s religious extremism stands on its own merit. If a majority elect a bigot, that doesn’t make him less of a bigot, it just says something about the majority.

If Nazi Germany re elected Hitler after torching synagogues and incinerating Jews, would that magically cleanse him of being a genocidal extremist? Of course not.

So no, Modi being elected, even 100X, doesn’t erase the fact that he has a long, well documented record of fanning religious hatred.

Time for you to go back to being that 'airport' guy, "Jealousy".
 
Criticism of Modi’s religious extremism stands on its own merit. If a majority elect a bigot, that doesn’t make him less of a bigot, it just says something about the majority.
So I was right, you are basically questioning the intellect of those millions of voters 🤡

If Nazi Germany re elected Hitler after torching synagogues and incinerating Jews, would that magically cleanse him of being a genocidal extremist? Of course not.
How is Nazi Germany related to Modi?

Bhai kya kar raha hai tu?

Modi incarnated who?

:murali

So no, Modi being elected, even 100X, doesn’t erase the fact that he has a long, well documented record of fanning religious hatred.

Can you show me that document please?

Time for you to go back to being that 'airport' guy, "Jealousy".
I know you will cry again if I call you being jealous of Modi, which is quiet apparent but I swear I will not call you today for the sake of this debate. Lets continue.
 
So I was right, you are basically questioning the intellect of those millions of voters 🤡


How is Nazi Germany related to Modi?

Bhai kya kar raha hai tu?

Modi incarnated who?

:murali



Can you show me that document please?


I know you will cry again if I call you being jealous of Modi, which is quiet apparent but I swear I will not call you today for the sake of this debate. Lets continue.
Continue? Continue what, dodging the actual point?

The reality is simple Indians did vote for a man known globally for his religious extremism and bigotry. And your brilliant counterargument is“but millions voted for him”?

That’s not a debate. That’s fan service.

Before you talk about debating, you might want to understand what a debate actually is. Hint, it’s not parroting crowd size as a defense for extremism. You haven’t even entered the arena yet.
 
At this rate, Hindutva fanboys will soon argue that slavery in America was a great idea, after all, it had widespread support back then too, right? People voted, so it must’ve been justified.

That’s how far gone the logic is when you start defending extremism with popularity contests.
 
BrahMos is the greatest missile on the planet today.

A supersonic cruise dagger that almost impossible to intercept.
The development of a new, compact air launched version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, the BrahMos-NG (Next Generation), is at an advanced stage,

india already have around 1500 brahmos missile and we just used 15 Brahmos missiles in the operation Sindoor .

:kp
 
The development of a new, compact air launched version of the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, the BrahMos-NG (Next Generation), is at an advanced stage,

india already have around 1500 brahmos missile and we just used 15 Brahmos missiles in the operation Sindoor .

:kp

Brahmos brought Pakistan to its knees in minutes.
 
Back
Top