There was a period of 5–7 years when Indian fast bowling was arguably world-class, with Ishant Sharma, Jasprit Bumrah, and Mohammed Shami leading the attack, occasionally supported by Umesh Yadav.
While India did win a Test series in Australia with new pacers, many of them—like Natarajan and Saini—failed to sustain that level and have since faded.
At the moment, it feels like India is heavily reliant on Bumrah, with the rest of the pacers lacking the same edge. In contrast, Pakistan’s pacers, such as Khurram Shahzad, Mir Hamza, and Amir Jamal, performed admirably in Australia, showcasing a more versatile and well-rounded attack. Pakistan could have even eked out a win or two had the batting stood up.
With Shaheen and Naseem also in the mix, it looks like a more balanced attack.
The way Bumrah is being overburdened to carry the hopes of a billion people raises concerns about his longevity. Has the balance shifted back to Pakistan as the land of pacers, with India returning to its reputation for trundlers like Harish Rana, Reddy, etc.?
While India did win a Test series in Australia with new pacers, many of them—like Natarajan and Saini—failed to sustain that level and have since faded.
At the moment, it feels like India is heavily reliant on Bumrah, with the rest of the pacers lacking the same edge. In contrast, Pakistan’s pacers, such as Khurram Shahzad, Mir Hamza, and Amir Jamal, performed admirably in Australia, showcasing a more versatile and well-rounded attack. Pakistan could have even eked out a win or two had the batting stood up.
With Shaheen and Naseem also in the mix, it looks like a more balanced attack.
The way Bumrah is being overburdened to carry the hopes of a billion people raises concerns about his longevity. Has the balance shifted back to Pakistan as the land of pacers, with India returning to its reputation for trundlers like Harish Rana, Reddy, etc.?
Last edited by a moderator: