786warrior
Local Club Captain
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
- Runs
- 2,261
- Post of the Week
- 1
why don't they show the foot landing fully before they adjudge a noball on the replay??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Lets bring in Afridi?
To many kids here trying to act smart by pretending they understand Test cricket better than other posters.
This is what your rubbish blocking against Peterson have cost you. No runs taken and now losing the wickets.
why don't they show the foot landing fully before they adjudge a noball on the replay??
So asking a batsman to score 2-3 overs, is not Test cricket. How old are you?
Now he is gone too, after blocking the spinner. Learn to understand Test cricket before you call things nonesense
As a bowler
As an inspiration
As a enthusiastic leader
Cheerful celebrator on field
And as a great entertainer
So? It is not limited over game were if you do not score fast enough the other batsman gets under pressure to keep the RR high. Learn to know the difference between a limited over match and Test (no limit on overs)
Doesn't need to fully land
with a different ball....Philander has answered waqar , what a bowler.
To many kids here trying to act smart by pretending they understand Test cricket better than other posters.
This is what your rubbish blocking against Peterson have cost you. No runs taken and now losing the wickets.
Umpires made another honest mistake and gave a replacement ball that is moving like it is 10 overs new
Pakistan should logde a complaint the ball has to be replaced with a ball of the same condition...
Actually clearly you dont know test cricket. I agree with iafzal, go watch 2020, its more suited for you from your posts.
If Misbah & Sarfraz had just kicked away Peterson like Azhar did, we wouldnt have been in this mess. They got confident against the spinner, especially Misbah, trying to score for no reason...
Players have to pay within their limitations. ..
If Azhar attacked he would have got out.
If umar akmal defends he would have got out.
That's why u need a mixture of player types.
philander is swinging because the newer ball that was gifted to them by umpires .. this combined with a brain-farts our batters had
i would like to applaud the icc umpiring panel for the great work they've done in this series, when umar gul wanted to change the ball in pakistans bowling innings when the ball lost its shape he was ballantly refused, but offcourse, why would they refuse sa, just look how much the ball has started misbehaving, thank you icc.
Both of them played poor shots. How difficult is to understand that? Misbah already decided to sweep but he could easily got to back foot and play.
You need to understand what positive cricket is. No one is asking them to slog like some crazy fools.
Restpect the good balls, but punish the bad ones. They did not punish the bad ones, hence the lead is only 160+ and not 200+ at the moment.
While I agree with all your other posts, this I do not agree with. Anybody can attack. The point was, Peterson was bowling a negative line. He was bowling AROUND the wicket, into the rough, hoping for typical Pakistani stupidity.
Any other country in the world would just use their left leg and kick that ball away 100 times out of 100. But Misbah probably realized if he defends, he will get criticized, he tried to sweep, got out and we collapsed.
Should have just kicked Peterson away ALL day!
156 overs STILL left! Why were we worried about RR so early??? No other country worries about RR in a test until after day on day 4, but Pakistani must have their pointless slogging....