What's new

Pakistan v New Zealand | 3rd Test - Day 2 | Napier | 12/12/09

salman24 said:
I was right again :). I was calling for Kaneria's inclusion in test matches when everyone was obsessed with Ajmal.
You and me for sure. Danish is much better than Ajmal in test
 
Well, If batsman HAS nicked it then he Should be a sportsman and walk. Why stand and waste time>?
 
This is the best Danish Kaneria has bowled for a very long time. He will win a lot of fans over if he keeps peforming like this.
 
Danni boy is ideal for Test matches, True donkey work you can get out of him. LOL
 
90MPH said:
This is the best Danish Kaneria has bowled for a very long time. He will win a lot of fans over if he keeps peforming like this.
he will unless selectors listen to some of Ajmal fans here:)
 
we need a wicket here because they both are playing their shots and getting runs
 
Gul bowling beautifully here.

If he goes wicketless this innings it would be a real travesty.
 
Why is Gul bowling shot of a length when the ball is reversing ?? He should bowling right at the toes.
 
This partnership hold the key for NZ. We need to break it fast INSHALLAH!


DUA STARTS AGAIN! LOL I've been saying this again and again Allah has listened to Us all. Cm'On PakPassioner's.

ThunderCat HOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooo!
 
I don't understand why it wasn't out. The whole ball has to be hitting the wicket? Can someone really explain the logic to me...
 
Desi said:
I don't understand why it wasn't out. The whole ball has to be hitting the wicket? Can someone really explain the logic to me...

The logic is simple - idiots are dealing with the referral system, until that changes we will continue to get baffling decisions like this
 
Back at Cricinfo they're still crying:

Dan from New Zealand: "While I believe it was out, why should Flynn be giving out on that evidence. Yesterday when O'Brien referred one (which would of been his 5-for) it was giving not out. The situation was the same. You could hear a sound but see nothing on hotspot. Why should it be out for one team and not for the other.. I thought this system was going to bring consistency not inconsistency"
 
Kamranz said:
This partnership hold the key for NZ. We need to break it fast INSHALLAH!


DUA STARTS AGAIN! LOL I've been saying this again and again Allah has listened to Us all. Cm'On PakPassioner's.

ThunderCat HOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooo!
this partnership won't last long
 
but rules r rules and will apply to all teams equally
 
That ball was hitting the middle of leg-stump! Taufel has sold us a dummy here, that was dead out
 
It was JUST less then half a ball on the wicket. WOW. Simon Taufel had to stick with the on field decision. If doctrove had given it out .. I am sure Taufel would have swayed in his direction.

Looked plumb though.
 
Guys< We Need To Start Countering These Comments On Cricinfo Seems ****:s Doing Alot Now.
 
kingusama92 said:
It was JUST less then half a ball on the wicket. WOW. Simon Taufel had to stick with the on field decision. If doctrove had given it out .. I am sure Taufel would have swayed in his direction.

Looked plumb though.
that's what i think. Decision on the field had to hold in that situation
 
kingusama92 said:
It was JUST less then half a ball on the wicket. WOW. Simon Taufel had to stick with the on field decision. If doctrove had given it out .. I am sure Taufel would have swayed in his direction.

Looked plumb though.

Exactly - this referral system seems to be more of a 'pat your buddy on the back' rather than lets make the correct decision
 
90MPH said:
Taufel got that wrong.

Nope he didn't.

According to the laws .. half the ball has to be hitting the wicket to change the decision. 1/3 of the ball was hitting thus the decision stays.

I know it's a stupid rule but it's the way it is.
 
At least we need one change in review system that is on field call thing if the ball is hitting the stumps(whether or not it is hitting zone of certainity) it should be out
 
GUYS< WE NEED TO START COUNTERING THESE COMMENTS ON CRICINFO SEEMS G0ray's DOING ALOT NOW.
 
Geordie Ahmed said:
Exactly - this referral system seems to be more of a 'pat your buddy on the back' rather than lets make the correct decision

We are learning one thing from this.

Doctrove sucks even more then we thought. :)))
 
KA$H said:
taufel just felt bad abt the flynn decision - so thats fair

Even thats a fair decision it was correct according to laws but seriously UDRS laws are flawed
 
Two of ICC's worts Umpires on the ground today in one of the most Important Test deciders.

Rudi and Doc Do little to cricket.
 
Back
Top