SarfiBabarHaris
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2017
- Runs
- 6,545
Faheem has been poor after management has put all the faith in him and gave him backing.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Did handscomb just did the white power hand gesture?
Pandya vs Faheem thread needs to be deleted as soon as possible because it is disrespect to a player like Pandya.
Imad has finesse with the bat. Faheem would have missed out on the delivery that he guided for a four.
Shadab and Faheem are cancerous all-rounders who should not be part of the playing XI. Imad needs to be the only all-rounder for now.
Nah, it wasn'tIf he did then ICC Need to ban him
Pandya was always several levels above Faheem. People were setting themselves up for embarrassment.
However, the usual suspects have not made the comparison for months now. It appears that they have accepted defeat and would prefer to be one with their humiliation in solitude.
He's not A magician, even Murali didn't have 2 wickets/ODI on average. He's there for the Afridi role (1/45 +25 off 20) and is doing that well enough, much better than Faheem 'air swings' Ashraf
Pandya hasn't been playing much recently that's why.
He has already played better knocks than Faheem will in his entire career. Don’t make it worse for yourself.
The reason Imad should bat at 6. He is a genuine bat.
He can hit but being wasted so low down the order.
Faheem started well but he has been badly exposed. He's not good enough to be in the team as a bowler nor as a batsman and we don't want a faux all-rounder that will weaken both aspects of our game. He shouldn't be in the WC squad.
Imad, on the other hand, is developing into a proper all-rounder.
Btw i dont get the recent love for Imad in this forum too.
His main job is to bowl 10 overs and take 2 wickets but he is not doing that.
In batting too he is not reliable.
He needs to step up atleast in UAE.
A bowling average of 40 is not even close to doing his job.
I dont like Afridi but he was a far better bowler than Imad in his later career.
Faheem's batting has been poor too no one is doubting that.
We can do much better with a bowler like Umer Khan who can win matches with his bowl by taking multiple wickets.
A bowling average of 40 is not even close to doing his job.
I dont like Afridi but he was a far better bowler than Imad in his later career.
Faheem's batting has been poor too no one is doubting that.
We can do much better with a bowler like Umer Khan who can win matches with his bowl by taking multiple wickets.
deluded
Pakistani batters in recent matches are doing much better than their Indians counterparts. India needs to be very cautious in the World Cup.
Sohail Akhtar, Umar Siddiq, Amir Yamin and maybe Shahzad should have been a part of this series.
His bowling needs new tricks though or he will be another loss.
We have better spinners than Imad.
A bowling average of 40 is not even close to doing his job.
I dont like Afridi but he was a far better bowler than Imad in his later career.
Faheem's batting has been poor too no one is doubting that.
We can do much better with a bowler like Umer Khan who can win matches with his bowl by taking multiple wickets.
Imad like Afridi is more of an economical bowler than a wicket taker. He does need to attack a bit more though, agreed to that
We have better spinners than Imad.
Please educate yourself on cricket
Please educate yourself on cricket
The problem is not Imad but with Shadab. Imad is a brilliant partner for a genuine wicket-taking spinner.
Think pak have score something like 55 in the last 9 overs
Again back to back delusion - Imad is there as a specialist all rounder. He's also Pakistan's best lower order hitter in ODIs.
Give it a rest now.
Shadab or his fans don't even know what his role in the team is.
Instead of Rizwan they should have sent Imad at 4.
At the least could have gotten close to 330 then.
Yeah by accepting a bowler who averages 40? Thanks but no thanks.
Apko apki cricket knowledge mubarak ho but i will take a pure bowler like Kuldeep or Umer Khan over Imad.
I will take India's route and play proper bowlers rather than all rounders who are not idher kay not udher kay.
And stop lecturing me, you are the one who quoted me not I.
I hope we never see Faheem coming in before Imad
There's something called having roles in a team.
He's fulfilling the role of being the run container.
And he's not a bowler he's an all rounder, he's doing his job perfectly.
Umer Khan should be in yes, but in a bowlers slot. His competition isn't Imad.
Imad makes the team on batting alone if averages are so important to you