Master Blaster
Local Club Star
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2007
- Runs
- 1,896
Umar Akmal is still miles ahead of Ghambir and Shewag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Umar Akmal is still miles ahead of Ghambir and Shewag.
Rohit averaging 288 in test
If i was Sehwag or Gambhir i will create a fake account on this forum and starts threads like Sehwag versus Umar Akmal or Gambhir versus Umar Akmal.
If i was Sehwag or Gambhir i will create a fake account on this forum and starts threads like Sehwag versus Umar Akmal or Gambhir versus Umar Akmal.
Sharma had a huge temperament issue for a long time. Who knows may be Umar may get better. He is not old and has plenty of years left.
Well said.Exactly. They dismiss good players after one or two failures and, nowadays, bring up list A averages to put down newbies.
Well said.
What's worse is the same fans want to make Afridi (despite his performances) and Alam captain.. Just goes to show how much weight their opinion should hold..
Amin looks a classy batsmen but seems mentally weak. I never expect much from him when he comes to bat he lacks confidence and isn't really good at reading the game.IMO, Amin is more similar to Rohit than Ukmal because Ukmal doesn't have a pleasing technique like Rohit, on top of temperament issues.
Amin looks a classy batsmen but seems mentally weak. I never expect much from him when he comes to bat he lacks confidence and isn't really good at reading the game.
We need to make this thread active again to boost rohit performance!
Not sure if Umar is capable of playing such innings anymore, that Rohit just pulls out of the hat once in every 2-3 months.
First it used to be Umar Akmal vs Virat Kohli comparisons
Then its Umar Akmal vs Rohit Sharma
Soon or I should say now it should be Umar Akmal vs Ashwin
In the future it will be Umar Akmal vs Umar Akmal
I dont see any hopes for Umar Akmal as a batsman. He is what he is cannot change him
Umar Akmal is limited player. He can play only 2 shots, midwicket and cut
An average of 30 (which is inflated by runs against Zimbabwe) after so many years shows what an overrated and garbage player he is. He is 26 now, not even a youngster.
He isn't even a poor man's Umar Akmal let alone more talented than him hahaha.
When and where has he shown this huge amount of talent? If he can't prove end product what is the use of his unbelievable talent?
Go and watch Umar bat and not just highlights. I admit he throws his wickets away but he isn't a cross batted slogger at all. He is a very well rounded batsman. It isn't about playing beautiful shots. Even Hafeez plays some gorgeous shots but we all know what a useless batsman he is?
Is this thread title some kind of a Joke? Comparing Rohit to Akmal LOL
Can you guys plz make threads like Bhuvaneswar Kumar vs Wahab Riaz? lets see if our bowlers start outperforming your bowlers or not
Rohit Sharma is a hack overseas He can't pierce the gap along the ground in first 10 overs. Whoever said that Rohit is the most talented batsman in India should take a walk.
Two odi hundreds against the best ODI team of this era in their own backyard. That too at Melbourne and Perth.
lol Akmals record is far superior in odis . Sharma hasnt played tests, akmal has played all but one innings in asia and during that time period had the highest average for a pakistani bat.
only in t20s does sharma take the apple
Sharma? Who avges 22 in his last 12 odis and 31 overall?
Please!! Akmal all the way
Lost patience with Rohit now. He's got it all yet continues to fail. Plays with legends, is supported to play his natural game and is still failing. Has had so many chances. Been moved around the order but still failing.
Umar is a lot different. Averaging a lot more then Rohit. Best PAK batsman(stats wise) and he isn't allowed to play in his natural position.
Umar > Rohit.
Rohit is a poor man's Bopara with the bat.
^ Rohit averages around 30 in ODIs
Umar averages nearly 40 in ODIs
Don't see how they're comparable
Umar is a far better batsman and performer, despite being denied playing at home he averages a lot more than rohit.
Indian posters say Rohit is talented but how, Kohli is much better,Rohit is not international standard
Rohit is a nobody, he can bugger off.
Pakistan however will sink without Akmal's middle-order batting and keeping skills.
Lol what a poor comparison.
Rohit is a poor man's Umar at best.
It has taken him years to take his average beyond the 20s.
His talent is imaginary; got very little to show for it.
Umar has a far better average and far better strike rate. He's in a different league to Rohit. Very lame comparison.
Umar is definitely better
rohit lol..another batsman who is bekaar..bit of swing, bit of pressure and the glass man shatters..another boring indian player.
Based on what?
Both toured WI in the space of few days.
Rohit - 5 matches, 217 runs at an average of 54.
Umar - 5 matches, 175 runs at an average of 58.
Since Rohit was opening, he had the opportunity to score more runs. But on balance of play, it is very fair to say that both had equally good tours.
Umar's last 15 matches before he was dropped = average of 43.
Umar' last 6 matches before he was dropped = average of 50.
How is that inconsistent? and why shouldn't we focus on overall averages? because it makes Rohit look bad and Umar look good?
Besides, no of hundreds are not the most important factor. It is your consistency of runs.
Hussey, one of the greatest ODI batsman of all time has only 3 hundreds compared to someone like Tharanga who has 13. So who is a better ODI batsman?
Please stop living under this delusion that Umar and Rohit are players of similar class and pedigree who have both followed similar career paths. Sorry to say but that is pure **.
it took Rohit 100 matches to take his ODI average beyond 30. Tried and tested failures like Farhat and Malik average more than him.
Umar Akmal is in a completely different league to Rohit. No comparison between the two.
Talent is meaningless when you have nothing to show for it at the highest level. 1/2 good series cannot wash away the 6 years of garbage.
Comparing Rohit to Umar is as pathetic as comparing Umar to Kohli.
Kohli is on a different level to Umar and Umar is on a different level to Kohli.
I dont remember a single batsmen in India's Odi history who has gone on to represent the country for more than 100 times, undeservingly and with such ease.
Even the likes of Sidhu, Ajay Jadeja, kaif, Manjrekar, Kambli gave more better performance after 100 Odis.
Its a shame that a more talented bat like Umar Akmal is being forced to keep wickets to earn a place in the time while a crap performer like Rohit is being given chances as dole.
Who would u consider a better player and bigger asset to his team?
There are two questions here and doesn't necessarily make the same answer.
1. Who is better player? ***** sharma. He has a place in Indian batting lineup that says a lot.
2. Who is bigger asset to his team? here Umar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ***** sharma.
Hack, Umar is bigger asset to his team than Tendu to indian team.
Two different frame of reference on the latter question.
^ What a stupid logic. Umar is not an Indian hence he cannot play for India and have a place in their batting line up so how does that make Rohit better than him?
Answer this. If Umar could play for India, would you pick him ahead of Rohit? looking at their track record, any sane person would.
Rohit behind UA....now that goes to show how pathetic Rohit has been that he is behind UA...... rohit's main problem is his attitude.....he looks like taking his place for granted and has looked so for 6 years now...UA is better
Reading the posts on page 1 and 2 especially Mamoon's
What a remarkable turnaround from Rohit! Incredible.
He's turned from complete garbage to diamond ever since he started opening.
Jokes aside, I think Umar Akmal is clearly the better player.
No bias.
This thread is proof that its about getting the best out of your players. Attapatu was a failure in his first few years.
Rohit Sharma had played a hundred plus ODI's and was averaging 30 and many ex players were losing patience with him and calling for him to be dropped. Umar Akmal at that stage in 2013 had a higher average than Rohit.
How times change. Umar Akmal will probably never play for Pakistan again now.
Reading the posts on page 1 and 2 especially Mamoon's
What a remarkable turnaround from Rohit! Incredible.
He's turned from complete garbage to diamond ever since he started opening.
If Rohit Sharma had done all the antics Umar did and had the same ill discipline, he wouldn't be selected again. Kambli, Sreesanth are some examples
5 years is a long time in cricket. More than Umar’s demise, Rohit’s rise as a top class opener deserves more attention.
From 2007 to 2013, he was hardly better than Umar of today, and whoever was behind the decision to make him open deserves a lot of credit. Right up there with the decision to make Dilshan open for Sri Lanka after 10 years of mediocrity in the middle-over.
Of course Rohit deserves a lot of credit for the transformation as well, he has improved his temperament leaps and bounds.
Maybe Umar could have been tried as opener 5-6 years back, was surely a better bet than Imran Farhat and a few others, but that ship has sailed now. I don’t think he would have transformed like Rohit, but it could have saved his career.
People digging up old posts and making fun of them should understand the timing, context and the reason(s) behind those posts. No one can predict the future, including me, except that Pakistan cricket will remain mediocre for a long, long time.
If Umar played for India or any other team, he'd be the best batsman in the world right now.
Kohli & Rohit have got the blessings of Umar Akmal
Hopefully Rahul also benefits from that
Also need Umar Akmal vs Shaw/Gill threads so that they can also blessed from the Lord
Is there a Rahul vs Akmal thread?
Jokes aside, I think Umar Akmal is clearly the better player.
No bias.
Lol so true )Kohli vs Akmal...............that thread made Kohlis career take off like a smooth plane.
I guess time will tell where this thread takes Rohits career
Umar Akmal is still miles ahead of Ghambir and Shewag.
5 years is a long time in cricket. More than Umar’s demise, Rohit’s rise as a top class opener deserves more attention.
From 2007 to 2013, he was hardly better than Umar of today, and whoever was behind the decision to make him open deserves a lot of credit. Right up there with the decision to make Dilshan open for Sri Lanka after 10 years of mediocrity in the middle-over.
Of course Rohit deserves a lot of credit for the transformation as well, he has improved his temperament leaps and bounds.
Maybe Umar could have been tried as opener 5-6 years back, was surely a better bet than Imran Farhat and a few others, but that ship has sailed now. I don’t think he would have transformed like Rohit, but it could have saved his career.
People digging up old posts and making fun of them should understand the timing, context and the reason(s) behind those posts. No one can predict the future, including me, except that Pakistan cricket will remain mediocre for a long, long time.
If Rohit Sharma had done all the antics Umar did and had the same ill discipline, he wouldn't be selected again. Kambli, Sreesanth are some examples
Jokes aside, I think Umar Akmal is clearly the better player.
No bias.
Umar Akmal should be made into an opener, he could really reinvent himself as a batsman. Majority of his false shots would be boundaries during the powerplay