Shoaib Malik Support & Performance Watch

Should Malik be in the plans for the 2019 WC?


  • Total voters
    421
  • Poll closed .
He was selected as a batsman in eng..failed miserably..selected as a batsman recently..failed miserably..so we should select him as a bowler only?? Kyon jee malik kay chachay ki team hay??
 
Nai zardari ke team hai nai nawaz ke hai oh sorry mushraf ke oh koi aur reh gaya wah g wah kurban jayo ap ke socho per its pakistan team brother so take care for that k kay chachaa
 
he is not only who fail in last innings you not read pp article from ba.Rr he fail in bat but good on bowling his average is under 10 in bowling here he will be back in form soon so you just COUNTINUE YOUR posting her but not Oh yaar ha g ho hai kya bacha like gp shp

We play 4 Proper Bowlers
We also play Afridi and Hafeez

Thats total 6 Bowlers
From those 6 three are Spinners

We have Ajmal, Hafeez, Afridi all three ranked in Top 10 ODI Bowlers
No additional Bowlers are needed

We need Batsmen and like u said
he fail in bat but good on bowling

U acknowledge he failed as a batsman
U cannot deny Ajmal Hafeez Afridi are better Spinners
U can see we already have 6 Bowlers

Malik is not needed
 
Last edited:
Is there anyone still even "supporting" anymore in the "support" thread lol
 
Good to see this has turned into a Shoaib Mailk "Bash" Thread :)
 
Firdous Ashiq Awan suffers from a broken foot in a car accident. No doubt she will want to recuperate with a game of tennis with her favourite couple :malik
 
The Shoaib Malik 'Support' Thread VS Shoaib Malik! Who scored the most runs!
shoaibmalikrunsvspakpas.png


shellshocked.jpg
 
A true test/international batsman should have a good firstclass record.
Anyone know what's SM's firstclass batting average?
 
I just checked but I must be mistaken because it shows his firstclass average as 33.4.

Could this be true? If so then I'd like to apologise to firstclass maestros such as Hick and Ramps, because Malik is not even a domestic bully. In fact his entire batting record is distinctly average.
How can a player with such a record be expected to do consistently well at international level.
It's also another nail in BZ's argument about Malik ending up with a similar average to that of YK.
Why? Because YK averages 50 in Firstclass cricket and has the ability whereas Malik if Malik can't do it in our domestic system then what chance does he have in international cricket??
 
Yes but YK and Malik have similar career path in test cricket.

After 20 games YK averages 45 and Malik 35.

After 33 tests YK averaged 40 Malik 33.

YK had 6 hundreds Malik 2.

To me it's freakish how similar records they have.

Another thing that proves this theory is the test matches(20) they featured together.

YK averages 57 Malik 40.

Again YK has 7 hundreds Malik 2.
 
I just checked but I must be mistaken because it shows his firstclass average as 33.4.

Could this be true? If so then I'd like to apologise to firstclass maestros such as Hick and Ramps, because Malik is not even a domestic bully. In fact his entire batting record is distinctly average.
How can a player with such a record be expected to do consistently well at international level.
It's also another nail in BZ's argument about Malik ending up with a similar average to that of YK.
Why? Because YK averages 50 in Firstclass cricket and has the ability whereas Malik if Malik can't do it in our domestic system then what chance does he have in international cricket??


I'm going to have to disagree with that reasoning. There are a lot of players who have had average domestic careers but have done well internationally. Most recently, you should look at Azhar Ali's stats. If you take out his Test stats from his FC stats, his FC stats are quite ordinary. Not saying that Malik has done better in tests than domestic matches, just trying to make a point that just because your domestic average is low doesn't mean you can't do well in intl crkt
 
^^^ who cares about pak domestic cricket? If malik was playing in county he would average 100 easily...pak domestic is not worthy of his immense talunts..
 
I'm going to have to disagree with that reasoning. There are a lot of players who have had average domestic careers but have done well internationally. Most recently, you should look at Azhar Ali's stats. If you take out his Test stats from his FC stats, his FC stats are quite ordinary. Not saying that Malik has done better in tests than domestic matches, just trying to make a point that just because your domestic average is low doesn't mean you can't do well in intl crkt

Azhar Ali hasn't played firstclass or international cricket on and off for 10/12 years! That's the difference!

Those with poorer firstclass records who have done well internationally have just done that, I.E they have succeeded.
On the hand SM has done nothing internationally on a aceptably consistent basis BUT doesn't even have a decent firstclass record to fall back on..

It's almost criminal how a player like SM keeps getting selected over upcoming players...
 
Yes but YK and Malik have similar career path in test cricket.

After 20 games YK averages 45 and Malik 35.

After 33 tests YK averaged 40 Malik 33.

YK had 6 hundreds Malik 2.

To me it's freakish how similar records they have.

Another thing that proves this theory is the test matches(20) they featured together.

YK averages 57 Malik 40.

Again YK has 7 hundreds Malik 2.

Enjoy YK as he wont be here for long.

i won't reply to your partial stats as then it wud make you a sad.
 
top 6 or 6th?

Yk and misbah so insecure ..dont give anyone else any chance.

Against Zim/SL he batted at #5 in four ODIs.
Against BD he batted at #6 in two ODIs.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...an;template=results;type=batting;view=innings


08 Sep 2011 ODI # 3188 vs Zim 4-129 (Shoaib Malik is out at 25.5 ov)
14 Sep 2011 ODI # 3194 vs Zim Malik come to bat in 34th over.
20 Nov 2011 ODI # 3215 vs SL 4-69 (Shoaib Malik is out at 21.6 ov)
23 Nov 2011 ODI # 3216 vs SL 4-113 (Shoaib Malik is out at 25.3 ov)
03 Dec 2011 ODI # 3220 vs BD Malik come to bat in 39th over.
06 Dec 2011 ODI # 3222 vs BD Malik come to bat in 36th over.

this is why i voted for wl.
 
Fawad Alam is also a lucky charm. He did nothing in World T20 2009 and check the result.

Why don't we include him in Playing XI in Next World T20?
 
The third guy apart from BZ and Riff is not replying i wonder where he is :akhtar
 
Malik is a lucky charm
pakistan hasn't lost any match when malik played....

Any 11 Random guys from Domestic Cricket will win vs Zim and Ban

vs SL we were 10 vs 11

Malik is dead weight and needs to be kicked
If u want Lucky Charm then bring in Fawad Alam atleast he will make more runs than Malik and provide the luck aswell
 
He needs time.... if we stick with him, he will be our major batsman for LOI.. and im not kidding :P
 
He needs time.... if we stick with him, he will be our major batsman for LOI.. and im not kidding :P

Is 12 years not enough time?

Why not give a youngster 12 months to succeed? I'm sure that would be enough time for someone to cement their place.

Can you give reasons as to why you think Malik could be succesful as a batsman? How does his overall record inspire you with confidence?
 
^and half these matches against minnows

as BZ would say........

but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but but (not :butt) ... he is not a minnow-basher. Only :afridi and :sachin are.
 
Black Zero said:
you need to establish your statements with data first...

otherwise statements = opinions

and you are entitled to have one.
Enjoy YK as he wont be here for long.

you need to establish your statements with data first...

Where is the damn data??????????????????????? :P
 
Last edited:
One day , A thesis will be written on this thread. I am sure some of the arguments must have been repeated like 50 times.
 
Lol , True. It is a hardwork though. Well , I must say it takes some balls to be a malik fan at the moment and defending him as he is don bradman. :D

There are some other possibilities.... besides being fan.... specially if the fans are blind enough to see that Malik has never done anything wrong....

+ the person defending Malik could be Malik himself.
+ the person defending Malik could be Sania.
+ the person defending Malik could be a Malik relative.
+ the person defending Malik could be a Malik friend.
+ the person defending Malik could be a teenage girl with a huge crush on Malik.
+ the person defending Malik could be just plain stupid.
+ the person defending Malik could be brilliant at trolling.
 
There are some other possibilities.... besides being fan.... specially if the fans are blind enough to see that Malik has never done anything wrong....

+ the person defending Malik could be Malik himself.
+ the person defending Malik could be Sania.
+ the person defending Malik could be a Malik relative.
+ the person defending Malik could be a Malik friend.
+ the person defending Malik could be a teenage girl with a huge crush on Malik.
+ the person defending Malik could be just plain stupid.
+ the person defending Malik could be brilliant at trolling.

You forgot:

The person defending Malik might be getting paid to do so.

That must be some sort of record! Well done mr mirza

Chris Martin is worse.
 
There are some other possibilities.... besides being fan.... specially if the fans are blind enough to see that Malik has never done anything wrong....

+ the person defending Malik could be Malik himself.
+ the person defending Malik could be Sania.
+ the person defending Malik could be a Malik relative.
+ the person defending Malik could be a Malik friend.
+ the person defending Malik could be a teenage girl with a huge crush on Malik.
+ the person defending Malik could be just plain stupid.
+ the person defending Malik could be brilliant at trolling.

+ the person defending Malik could be <img src="http://lh3.ggpht.com/-mC4SUL2Pp2k/Tt4EEhaPdrI/AAAAAAAAFV0/bIuNjEdTSlY/s800/FAA.png" >
 
Liar liar ... pants of fire.... ! :))

Against Zim/SL he batted at #5 in four ODIs.
Against BD he batted at #6 in two ODIs.
http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/en...an;template=results;type=batting;view=innings


08 Sep 2011 ODI # 3188 vs Zim 4-129 (Shoaib Malik is out at 25.5 ov)
14 Sep 2011 ODI # 3194 vs Zim Malik come to bat in 34th over.
20 Nov 2011 ODI # 3215 vs SL 4-69 (Shoaib Malik is out at 21.6 ov)
23 Nov 2011 ODI # 3216 vs SL 4-113 (Shoaib Malik is out at 25.3 ov)
03 Dec 2011 ODI # 3220 vs BD Malik come to bat in 39th over.
06 Dec 2011 ODI # 3222 vs BD Malik come to bat in 36th over.


SS.... sharam karo yar... ab tu vote de du... yeh to jhoot and sach main jang hai! :P

just to be on same page, i was talking about 3rd ODI

There were reports about Malik Playing One-Down, and i had mentioned it in farhat's thread.

View attachment 21091

Misbah/YK could have given Malik a break but they are so insecure.
anyway no biggy..
 
- Check in PP Interview section and see what Malik says about this issue.
- Go through this thread as i have also addressed this issue and also asked a simple question...that is still unanswered.

answer that question and we can go from there.

70 Pages and you want me to go through this thread which is on Crap player?

Why don't you answer this simple question

Should he be selected in squad against England series in UAE?

This is what he did after comeback

1.png


His last 38 innings performance

1323170007506.png
 
70 Pages and you want me to go through this thread which is on Crap player?

if you care to post in this thread, you ought to read the background of the discussion...otherwise new comers will keep jumping in the "end" of discussion and needlessly keep asking same old questions.

nothing against you...but if you can't read then don't expect others to spoon feed you.
 
this is why i voted for wl.

I never knew that you also like blue color like WL...
anyway, i counted on you for vote...next time i'll try to use blue as my font color.

I wonder how you knew on Nov 28th (when you casted the vote) that WL likes Blue as WL posted on Dec 6th (effect before cause)...


now, qq, are you withdrawing your withdrawal?

View attachment 21093
 
One day , A thesis will be written on this thread. I am sure some of the arguments must have been repeated like 50 times.

Thats the reason, I have to pass questions that has been asked 100 of times and answered atleast 10 times.

But then some want personalized answers ...so not really a win situation.
 
if you care to post in this thread, you ought to read the background of the discussion...otherwise new comers will keep jumping in the "end" of discussion and needlessly keep asking same old questions.

nothing against you...but if you can't read then don't expect others to spoon feed you.

Why should I care about ''Background of the discussion''?

My Question is on Malik's recent failure(s). Why don't you answer that one instead of ignoring it? :))

Should he be selected in squad against England series?

This is what he did after comeback

1.png


His last 38 innings performance

1323170007506.png
[/QUOTE]
 
Why should I care about ''Background of the discussion''?

My Question is on Malik's recent failure(s). Why don't you answer that one instead of ignoring it? :))

Should he be selected in squad against England series?

This is what he did after comeback

1.png


His last 38 innings performance

1323170007506.png
[/QUOTE]

of course yes!

(had you gone through this thread, you wudn'y have asked this question)
 
Do you like to put yourself in a hole?


How can you know Malik was the best bowler(which he was NOT), when you haven't even watched the match?


Infact, everything you have said about this series has now become invalid.

I checked the scorecard at cricinfo...Malik and ajmal got three each...while ajmal was helped by umpire (so technically he got two)
 
I can't believe that even Muzy has stopped supporting malik (and even she only mainly supported him because SHE thought he was a bit of alright).

Riff and BZ (Anwar) - you're undying love is actually quite disturbing - esp considering you claim not to be of the female population

Problem with answering your question is that you ask question and then you disappears for weeks and return with same/different question...

i have answered in other thread that why Muzy stopped supporting Malik

cause Malik refused to give him/her an autograph...

and Muzy mentioned this in a furious post ...serach it yourself or ask him/her.
 
Last edited:
some facts about this season:

Malik played most of the ODI/T20 series.
Malik was not given chance in Tests.

Only one series left and then there is a big gap...

and, FYI
next season, Malik will be back.. :Riff
 
some facts about this season:

Malik played most of the odi/t20 series.
Malik was not given chance in tests.

Only one series left and then there is a big gap...

And, fyi
next season, malik will be back.. :riff

0, 17, 2, 2*, 0, 2, 11, 7, 14, 2, 3, 3, 9
 

of course yes!

(had you gone through this thread, you wudn'y have asked this question)[/QUOTE]


And Reason?

Parchi of Firdous Aashiq Awan? :))
 
Riff you were asking about that match Malik quit, well heres an article from cricinfo:

Malik fined for conceding game, chaos follows

On a day of controversial developments, Shoaib Malik, captain of the Sialkot Stallions, was fined Rs10,000 [US$170 approx] for his decision to concede a game against the Karachi Zebras in the ongoing Twenty20 domestic competition. Chasing a target of 176, the Stallions moved to 151 for 3 at the end of the 16th over and were favourites to clinch the game with 25 needed in four overs. However, Malik and Shahid Siddiq mustered just 20 in the last four and the Stallions ended up losing by four runs.

Malik insisted this was done as a protest to bring attention to his team's game against the the Lahore Eagles, which was affected by a slow over-rate penalty imposed by the umpires. The result of the game ensured that the Zebras, and not the Eagles, would make it past the league round, but the Pakistan board stepped in to declare the match null and void, which meant that the Eagles advanced to the next stage, where they will be joined by the Karachi Dolphins and the Faisalabad Wolves.

In a further twist, the The News, a Pakistan based daily, reported that had Sialkot won, they would have reached the next stage of the competition thereby implying that Malik's move had backfired. Had Sialkot won, they would have been tied on points with Lahore, whose run-rate was significantly lower than Sialkot's - a point Malik seemed to be unaware of.

But he had more immediate problems to deal with: the Pakistan board set up an inquiry committee comprising Shafiq Ahmed, Haroon Rasheed and Asghar Haider, and Malik will face them on Saturday morning.

Malik was also at the receiving end of hostility from the secretary of the Karachi association. "What is the fault of our team?" Sirajul Islam Bukhari, the secretary, said. "The Board should ban or do whatever they want with Malik but why penalise us. We played wholeheartedly to win the match and who can say ... perhaps Sialkot also lost because our bowlers bowled well in the final overs."

On being asked by a commentator about why he lost the game, Malik was quoted by the Nation as having said, "Where were they [the critics] when our team lost on slow over-rate against Lahore Eagles. Our timing was going fine in that match and even umpires told us that we bowled in time but we were penalised and we lost the match."
http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan/content/story/208310.html
 
Riff you were asking about that match Malik quit, well heres an article from cricinfo:


http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan/content/story/208310.html

for Riff:

I am surprised if you were not aware of this incident.

in that tournament there was a rule of penalty runs awarded to opponent if team bowls at slow over rate.

SS got awarded penalty runs..and while defending the target Malik ensured that their over rate remain better than required..and he kept asking the officials and was told numerous times that over rate of SS was fine.

technically SS won the match but later they (tournament officials)added 18 runs (relying on memory as it happened in 2005/6) to opponent's score and hence declared opponents the winner.

in next match, Malik protested by not winning the match... (played-out last two overs and scored nothing, while he could have easily won the match)

had SS won, they still could have qualified for next round but i believe it was required by malik to bring this dishonesty of officials to light...

and in result that rule was scarped and now officials can't pick winners in the room, and now they have to win in the ground.

Great act by Malik...

Note: those two losses were not actually losses for SS as one was given by officials and second was lost in protest :inzi

and after that SS remain unbeaten for 5 years...so we can say...SS remained unbeaten since start to the point when RR defeated them last year.
 
Riff you were asking about that match Malik quit, well heres an article from cricinfo:


http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan/content/story/208310.html

When did I ask for this match? Remind me

I can remember when this happened. I guess peoples' opinion of Malik changing since then might have affected their view of this incident now but Im sure back then people were split as to whether they thought he made the right move. I cant find the particular thread.

Anyone got the video of Malik's post-match interview with Rameez after this match?
 
Last edited:
I don't think SS appreciate YK (or anyone else) scoring 100 against minnows...
SS is quality conscious person.

Phir ulti baaat .... hamesha ki tarah?? Has YK scored a 100 yet? He could be out first ball tomorrow.

I was talking about SIX THOUSAND test runs......

Now can you congratulate him?
 
Last edited:
Phir ulti baaat .... hamesha ki tarah?? Has YK scored a 100 yet? He could be out first ball tomorrow.

I was talking about SIX THOUSAND test runs......

Now can you congratulate him?

no, I'll wait for the time when YK scores in testing conditions against top bowlers...

P.S. first time in my life I realize Pakistan should not have divided...
what a meaningless team.
 
I don't think SS appreciate YK (or anyone else) scoring 100 against minnows...
SS is quality conscious person.

Yes I am quality conscious and admire a player who scored all his hundreds against the major teams.

Now it's about time he cashed in his due share against the minnows.
 
i sense a conflict here, but then it's me.

look who is talking!!! :))

yes.... we know .. .you are a man of your words, ethics and morals! :P you never say conflicting things..... and never had double standards! ;-)


this thread is living proof of that!
 
no, I'll wait for the time when YK scores in testing conditions against top bowlers...

P.S. first time in my life I realize Pakistan should not have divided...
what a meaningless team.

So in Eng 06 was not testing conditions? He scored at 65 in a team where apart from Moyo no averaged 40 on that tour.

His only series in Aus was not testing against Warne n McGrath where he was our best batsman on tour.
 
So in Eng 06 was not testing conditions? He scored at 65 in a team where apart from Moyo no averaged 40 on that tour.

His only series in Aus was not testing against Warne n McGrath where he was our best batsman on tour.

No those were not testing conditions...(already discussed in YK threads )

I'll show again, if you'd insist.
 
Back
Top