- Joined
- Jul 8, 2018
- Runs
- 12,487
- Post of the Week
- 4
In one game, any team can win. In home conditions, Pakistan would have more of a chanceAnd Pakistan still losing the game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
In one game, any team can win. In home conditions, Pakistan would have more of a chanceAnd Pakistan still losing the game
In one game, any team can win. In home conditions, Pakistan would have more of a chanceAnd Pakistan still losing the game
But it's PakistanIn one game, any team can win. In home conditions, Pakistan would have more of a chance
The idea of India playing all their matches in Lahore sounds like something that could potentially happen
It's not happening.The idea of India playing all their matches in Lahore sounds like something that could potentially happen. Logistically it makes sense and would take care of alot of the security related issues. I think the Indian players will like Lahore if they are allowed to move around a little bit. It is quite similar to Delhi in alot of ways. Only better
+1If sharma & kohli will be retired by then tell Indians to stay home.. Ind Pak rivalry died ages ago no one will want to invest in rinku Singh vs saim Ayub!
Why would it be Pakistans job to compensate the other boards for lost revenue
They were given hosting rights by ICC.Because pakistan is hosting.
Sometimes even a blind squirrel finds a nutBut it's Pakistan
Its very hard to imagine but crazier things have happened.It won't happen.
They were given hosting rights by ICC.
If Pakistan is deemed safe and secure then it's not the issue of the hosts whether India attend or not. That will be between the ICC and India.
If any board has to provide compensation, it will have to be the Indian board who under the instruction of their fascist government is unwilling to tour a country which is considered safe by all the other participating Nations.Then ICC can take away the tournament if its financially unviable?
No, if India has a problem, they just get replaced with another team. Simple as that. Why would India pay anything? They don't want to participate, well and good. Their right to. ICC moves on. Brings in another team as replacement.If any board has to provide compensation, it will have to be the Indian board who under the instruction of their fascist government is unwilling to tour a country which is considered safe by all the other participating Nations.
If only India has a problem, then India shall pay for whatever losses that are incurred while hosting the tournament in Pakistan.
Tournament will have to be hosted in Pakistan at any cost, it's the usual procedure by ICC to allot Global events to different parts of the World. Pakistan's right to host the tournament cannot be taken away due to some Fanatic currently ruling in India and his vote bank Politics .
Tournament will be taken away and no money will be given..If any board has to provide compensation, it will have to be the Indian board who under the instruction of their fascist government is unwilling to tour a country which is considered safe by all the other participating Nations.
If only India has a problem, then India shall pay for whatever losses that are incurred while hosting the tournament in Pakistan.
Tournament will have to be hosted in Pakistan at any cost, it's the usual procedure by ICC to allot Global events to different parts of the World. Pakistan's right to host the tournament cannot be taken away due to some Fanatic currently ruling in India and his vote bank Politics .
That should be the rule but we know, that is not going to happen. ICC and BCCI are on one page so we know what is going to happen in the end.No, if India has a problem, they just get replaced with another team. Simple as that. Why would India pay anything? They don't want to participate, well and good. Their right to. ICC moves on. Brings in another team as replacement.
In that case, the problem is with the ICC. Everyone's beef should be with the ICC. Not the BCCI. ICC should be the ones the needs to be asked questions.That should be the rule but we know, that is not going to happen. ICC and BCCI are on one page so we know what is going to happen in the end.
LOL. DO you think ICC will take any action against BCCI????In that case, the problem is with the ICC. Everyone's beef should be with the ICC. Not the BCCI. ICC should be the ones the needs to be asked questions.
Of course not. But that does not change the facts. ICC is the problem.LOL. DO you think ICC will take any action against BCCI????
No jokes
Yes ICC has the issues. They are biased.Of course not. But that does not change the facts. ICC is the problem.
They don't have any option. Others boards specially PCB talk big but not generated revenues .Yes ICC has the issues. They are biased.
ICC should have thought about this before making Pakistan the host for the Champions Trophy 2025.They don't have any option. Others boards specially PCB talk big but not generated revenues .
They have 2nd largest cricketing market but they doesn't generate enough revenue for icc like India .
So PCB should know the limitations before talking Big .
Happy if indian tean tour.Gut feeling is that the reports of India traveling to Pakistan and playing all matches in Lahore is true.
That's a possibility yeah.Then ICC can take away the tournament if its financially unviable?
I remember 2006 ind vs pak series.match started around at 11.30 am in day and night .In second innings ball used to swing crazy for first 15 overs.In 4th match at Lahore, umar gul bowled brilliantly ,Sachin survived and scored good later to win the match.Lahore is a horrible place for D/N ODI cricket.
It's a wicket on which anything can be chased thanks to dew at night. BCCI must insist on NSK, Karachi which varies somewhat.
It will be amazing if it happens. Lahori crowd is always noisy and jam-packed.Gut feeling is that the reports of India traveling to Pakistan and playing all matches in Lahore is true.
ICC - Think......Oil - Water.ICC should have thought about this before making Pakistan the host for the Champions Trophy 2025.
That is not an excuse now that India does not want to come so we are shifting the tournament. That's your problem, not Pakistan's.
If any board has to provide compensation, it will have to be the Indian board who under the instruction of their fascist government is unwilling to tour a country which is considered safe by all the other participating Nations.
If only India has a problem, then India shall pay for whatever losses that are incurred while hosting the tournament in Pakistan.
Tournament will have to be hosted in Pakistan at any cost, it's the usual procedure by ICC to allot Global events to different parts of the World. Pakistan's right to host the tournament cannot be taken away due to some Fanatic currently ruling in India and his vote bank Politics .
LOL. DO you think ICC will take any action against BCCI????
No jokes
Gut feeling is that the reports of India traveling to Pakistan and playing all matches in Lahore is true.
ICC must have a plan B.ICC - Think......Oil - Water.
It would mark a new milestone. As a Cricket lover. I do want this to happen once. Players like Kohli, Rohit and Bumrah should once play in Pakistan.There is a chance that India will travel as this is a ICC event.
Yeah, they can resist and have no option.There is a chance that India will travel as this is a ICC event.
they should be as Pakistan also visited for ODI WCThere is a chance that India will travel as this is a ICC event.
It's India bro, ego won't let them visit Pakistan.they should be as Pakistan also visited for ODI WC
Depends on the local political elections cycle and any terror attack before Champions trophy.Gut feeling is that india will travel (will be decided at the last moment), they will play all matches in Lahore. Hope kohli and rohit dont retire by then.
History gonna repeat itself, India won't be coming to Pakistan.Depends on the local political elections cycle and any terror attack before Champions trophy.
'ICC's duty to ensure that all teams visit Pakistan': Former Pakistan skipper Salman Butt
"We try sensationalizing everything. There have been a few reports suggesting that Jay Shah has given a positive signal. However, I don't think he's given any signals. I wouldn't have been excited even if there had been a signal from him because it is the ICC's duty to ensure that all teams visit Pakistan,"
"If they come, then they welcome, if they don't, the ICC has to deal with it. We will find out if they can just deal with all the other countries or can do the same with India as well. It will show how much authority they have as a regulator and how neutral they can be,"
And you will pay the all revenue lost due to India . rightI agree with Salman Butt.
If India don't come, I say treat India's games as forfeited games. The 3 teams from India's group should get 2 points each. India can have a "group stage elimination with 3 losses" in their record.
Another option is to replace India with Sri Lanka (who finished 9th in ODI WC).
Moving CT out of Pakistan or even having a hybrid model would be disrespectful toward Pakistan.
And you will pay the all revenue lost due to India . right
I hope you are being sarcastic.All these revenue talks are due to greed.
I refuse to believe cricket can't be played if India do not participate. Do affiliate/associate nations not play cricket? There are no India in their tournaments.
I hope you are being sarcastic.
You realize that associate and affiliate cricket generate zero revenue and almost completely funded by ICC who in turn is funded by BCCI ?
You can believe in space aliens for all those you want. I don't care.I refuse to believe 11 Test nations can't have a global tournament without India. Many of these nations are rich first world nations (Australia, England etc.).
ICC needs to diversify and not rely on one country for revenue. ICC shouldn't be greedy.
Well said.This has been discussed endlessly for the past one and a half decade and this is my stance on the matter.
* Pakistan deserves the right to host global tournaments just like every major member nation and if the governing body gives due security clearances then there should be no hurdle for PCB in hosting such tournaments.
* Indian government’s decision to not send the cricket team to Pakistan is sentimental and political and must be respected. But the only injustice i see in this situation is that while India is usually able to negotiate shifting of its matches to neutral venues, the same doesn’t happen for Pakistan. Pakistan are forced to visit India to participate in ICC tournaments and they’re not given the same option to play their matches at neutral venues. Please correct me if I am wrong here. This is not correct. Both nations and their respective boards might have different politicoeconomic clout but Pakistan being full member nation and a former world champion must get this much.
* Forefeiting tournaments is not an option for either nation as both their fans are cricket crazy and aspire for championships. It’s necessary for their sense of pride.
Golden chance for India to beat Pakistan at their home soil.
Golden chance for India to beat Pakistan at their home soil.
It really is. They can finally take revenge for aane do series
Agree completely. But will the ICC do it?I refuse to believe 11 Test nations can't have a global tournament without India. Many of these nations are rich first world nations (Australia, England etc.).
ICC needs to diversify and not rely on one country for revenue. ICC shouldn't be greedy.
I think the next T20 WC is also in India. Absolutely horrible conditions with dew playing the role of a massively impactful 12th man.Lahore is a horrible place for D/N ODI cricket.
It's a wicket on which anything can be chased thanks to dew at night. BCCI must insist on NSK, Karachi which varies somewhat.
Most sponsors are Indian companies. If there are foreign sponsors, it's possible. But it would be a flop tournament with not much money made.I refuse to believe 11 Test nations can't have a global tournament without India. Many of these nations are rich first world nations (Australia, England etc.).
ICC needs to diversify and not rely on one country for revenue. ICC shouldn't be greedy.
I understand this attitude from sponsors and corporates but I find it funny how Indian fans judge a tournament as flop or not based on the money it can make.Most sponsors are Indian companies. If there are foreign sponsors, it's possible. But it would be a flop tournament with not much money made.
Things have changed since the 70's and 80's. In a big way. The issue is not that matches cannot be organized. Or cricket will die. Economics has changed.How was England hosting Odi World Cups once upon a time from 75-83 ? Was India funding all the travel expenses and match arrangement costs for teams including Champions WI ?
Were Pakistan WI series in the 80s funded by BCCI or the Indian market ? Lol.
Were Ashes series not happening in the 70s and 80s and earning some money ? I refuse to believe Cricket will come to a standstill without BCCI, many more obscure Sports in the World are surviving which don't have even have a fraction of Crickets popularity minus India..
Besides, BCCI only makes money because there is an opposition which plays against India. The foreign players are the ones who make IPL a spectacle.
If International teams won't play BCCI then how will BCCI make money through tours ? Will India organize matches between India A , India B and India C ?
IPL without foreign players will be a boring domestic T20 tournament that nobody matches..
Television rights went for peanuts in 70s and 80s. The explosion in tv viewership coincided with rise in Indian economy and middle class. Most sponsors are Indian companies even now and their target audience is an Indian fan. Foreign players were important in the beginning until fan loyalty was established. Even now it's important but that doesn't mean Indian fans don't watch IPL. I'd say foreign players will leave their own national teams to play in IPL if there is resistance from foreign boards. Also, the foreign boards actually make money if their players play in IPL. They also get favorable schedules for home series. At this stage cricket will die without Indian money.How was England hosting Odi World Cups once upon a time from 75-83 ? Was India funding all the travel expenses and match arrangement costs for teams including Champions WI ?
Were Pakistan WI series in the 80s funded by BCCI or the Indian market ? Lol.
Were Ashes series not happening in the 70s and 80s and earning some money ? I refuse to believe Cricket will come to a standstill without BCCI, many more obscure Sports in the World are surviving which don't have even have a fraction of Crickets popularity minus India..
Besides, BCCI only makes money because there is an opposition which plays against India. The foreign players are the ones who make IPL a spectacle.
If International teams won't play BCCI then how will BCCI make money through tours ? Will India organize matches between India A , India B and India C ?
IPL without foreign players will be a boring domestic T20 tournament that nobody matches..
It's all idealistic to.talk about love and passion but at the end it's a business. Viability is key for any business. Losing money isn't sustainableI understand this attitude from sponsors and corporates but I find it funny how Indian fans judge a tournament as flop or not based on the money it can make.
Are they fans of the sport or fans of the sponsor deals?
But the ICC and boards are the ones with this attitude. They are the ones that matter. They want the easy money, period. Selfishness, greed and corruption being the reasons.I understand this attitude from sponsors and corporates but I find it funny how Indian fans judge a tournament as flop or not based on the money it can make.
Are they fans of the sport or fans of the sponsor deals?
Exactly. Real world. Reality.Television rights went for peanuts in 70s and 80s. The explosion in tv viewership coincided with rise in Indian economy and middle class. Most sponsors are Indian companies even now and their target audience is an Indian fan. Foreign players were important in the beginning until fan loyalty was established. Even now it's important but that doesn't mean Indian fans don't watch IPL. I'd say foreign players will leave their own national teams to play in IPL if there is resistance from foreign boards. Also, the foreign boards actually make money if their players play in IPL. They also get favorable schedules for home series. At this stage cricket will die without Indian money.
Same here.. Rohit and Virat’s last chance for 2017 Revenge ! lol jk just want to see some games there been so long sincE ICT went there.I wish India to travel to Pakistan this time
ICC didn’t make any money(no additional funds) as such until Dalmiya hosted the 1998 CT in Dhaka.How was England hosting Odi World Cups once upon a time from 75-83 ? Was India funding all the travel expenses and match arrangement costs for teams including Champions WI ?
Were Pakistan WI series in the 80s funded by BCCI or the Indian market ? Lol.
Were Ashes series not happening in the 70s and 80s and earning some money ? I refuse to believe Cricket will come to a standstill without BCCI, many more obscure Sports in the World are surviving which don't have even have a fraction of Crickets popularity minus India..
Besides, BCCI only makes money because there is an opposition which plays against India. The foreign players are the ones who make IPL a spectacle.
If International teams won't play BCCI then how will BCCI make money through tours ? Will India organize matches between India A , India B and India C ?
IPL without foreign players will be a boring domestic T20 tournament that nobody matches..
Gut feeling is that the reports of India traveling to Pakistan and playing all matches in Lahore is true.