cricketjoshila
ODI Captain
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Runs
- 46,482
- Post of the Week
- 1
Pretty sure ICC can just saying.
The whole bcci money backing is an over exaggerated concept.
The reason people want India to play isn't because they have complete control over ICC, it's because India vs Pakistan are lucrative matches regardless of whether India is a million times superior or not.
A tournament without India is boring in general, If Australia boycotted the tournament and India accepted then ICC would be making similar concessions with Australia or England, that's just how it is.
Pretty sure ICC can just saying.
The whole bcci money backing is an over exaggerated concept.
The reason people want India to play isn't because they have complete control over ICC, it's because India vs Pakistan are lucrative matches regardless of whether India is a million times superior or not.
A tournament without India is boring in general, If Australia boycotted the tournament and India accepted then ICC would be making similar concessions with Australia or England, that's just how it is.
Court puts price tag on ICC action against India
The Delhi high court directed the government to stop foreign exchange transactions by Indian sponsors of the World Cup to the ICC if the Indian team is disqualified.
m.rediff.com
You need to read just one article. This is what can happen to the ICC.
80 percent of ICC money comes from India.
Last edited by a moderator: