Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Its stupid. I mean, How can people actually say Australia and Pakistan played tricks so India could not qualify? Pakistan played very well yesterday and they beat Australia fairly. We could not defend 120 against South Africa as our bowling was poor." - Virat Kohli.
This kid is class not just on the field. Double thumbs up![]()
Kohli is already better than tendulkar because his only goal is to win matches for India and Tendulkars only goal when he was 23 was to earn money . He said that and I can swear that .
For India's sake I hope Kohli is not another Sachin...a grade-A selfish loser who plays high percentage cricket for his average and milestones...there is no flair, flamboyance or desire to play spectacularly on the part of Sachin when it came to Test cricket...and India's record over the years has adequately shown this fact...
You are so ignorant that it is embarrassing. Tendulkar at 23 (i.e. during 1996) was a freak of a batsman. Not many in 100+ years of Cricket history have managed to reach the same level, he was untouchable.
I was not talking about class or talent but the mindset and priority. Tendulkar priority was to earn money whereas Virats priority is to win matches for India. Kohli has already beaten Pakistan single handedly than Sachin was able to do in the entire 20 years he batted.
I was also only talking about mentality. Tendulkar has played far better innings against far better bowlers in his career, it doesn't hurt him if you don't remember those efforts.
I was also only talking about mentality. Tendulkar has played far better innings against far better bowlers in his career, it doesn't hurt him if you don't remember those efforts.
Thats what hurts me the most. All those innings and how many of those actually helped India win???
Kohli hasn't been tested here... that has to do with the overall quality of pace bowling around the World too!
Most of them. Nobody has collectively contributed more to our world cups wins over Pakistan than Sachin, are you for real? Post after post you are showing your ignorance regarding Indian Cricket.
I just remember 2003 world cup where he gave a decent contribution
I just remember 2003 world cup where he gave a decent contribution
Kohli is the most complete batsman in the world currently. He hasn't ever looked like getting out besides 2 balls v Cummins. Cummins v Kohli may eventually be a battle of the ages, similar to McGrath v Tendy.
Also has only lost 40 international matches which means losing another 220 is going to be tough work.
I just remember 2003 world cup where he gave a decent contribution
Most of them. Nobody has collectively contributed more to our world cups wins over Pakistan than Sachin, are you for real? Post after post you are showing your ignorance regarding Indian Cricket.
yes, they were in the 90s many times. I'm sure Indianwillow and Velu will produce the 'misleading' stats but those who have seen the Indian team in 90s will know what SRT's failures meant for the team.Some posters saying Kohli has the class of Tendu.. In your dreams.
Kohli's scoring been very good .. but he is doesnt have the technique like Sachin's.
I sure do hope he wins more matches and outperforms all contemporaries.
Making a comment of Sachin loosing matches (alone) .. as if other 10 were there just to fill the seats.
Dumb comment.
^^RA seems to have been influenced by haters it seems. Cant help it if he is that gullible and cant see the woods for the trees.
Anyways, People keep calling him selfish and playing for money.. well he himself stayed away from t20s. He never went for scoring for 300 in tests. Doesnt goes about advertising about his charity foundation, and neither does give statements/replies in the media for the salvos fired against him.
His current picking and choosing matches is questionable of late, but other than that.. he has been every bit a class player.
^^RA seems to have been influenced by haters it seems. Cant help it if he is that gullible and cant see the woods for the trees.
The post 2000 fans are really annoying to be honest. The ignorance is quite offensive.
"Sachin took the elevator and I took the staircase," said Kambli. If the last year is anything to go by, Kohli is in the same elevator, heading inexorably for greatness.
In 15 years' time, somebody might be saying the same about Kohli. It's hard to see him fading away like another batsman with the same initials, Vinod Kambli. He was Tendulkar's peer – they added 664 together in one school game – but played only 17 Tests, the last at the age of 23. "Sachin took the elevator and I took the staircase," said Kambli. If the last year is anything to go by, Kohli is in the same elevator, heading inexorably for greatness.
Kambli did not take the stair case. He took off on a plane and crash landed, never to go up again.![]()
This forum pays far too much attention to a player like Kohli, who chokes in all important matches and is yet to prove himself at the Test level. A few knocks against Sri Lanka and Pakistan in flat tracks have made him a new hero. He still has to go miles.
On topic, if Umar Akmal plays at 4, he'll surely do much better and win many more games for Pakistan.
This forum pays far too much attention to a player like Kohli, who chokes in all important matches and is yet to prove himself at the Test level. A few knocks against Sri Lanka and Pakistan in flat tracks have made him a new hero. He still has to go miles.
On topic, if Umar Akmal plays at 4, he'll surely do much better and win many more games for Pakistan.
i dont think batting at 3rd or 6th really matter.as long as misba,kamran,afridi will be there i dont think umar has any opportunity to improve hi stats.Put him into indian team instead of nohit i am sure he will started to flow
Batting at no 6 is not necessarily a big issue. Dhoni at no 6 or 7 has averaged 50+ in ODI at a healthy S/R. In a relatively weak batting line up like Pakistan, Umar should grab his chances at any batting position, because the top order of Pak is not such that the top three bat until the 40th over and give Umar Akmal very few opportunities. Why not stand up at no 5/6 and deliver big? That will automatically promote him up the order, in due course.
another U Akmal thread?!Is there no other batsman in entire Pakistan?
Originally Posted bySandeep99
I'd never have an Akmal in our team
This forum pays far too much attention to a player like Kohli, who chokes in all important matches and is yet to prove himself at the Test level. A few knocks against Sri Lanka and Pakistan in flat tracks have made him a new hero. He still has to go miles.
On topic, if Umar Akmal plays at 4, he'll surely do much better and win many more games for Pakistan.
I'd never have an Akmal in our team![]()
Not very funny, my lord.
On a serious note, the problem I see is Umar Akmal will not have enough partners left at the other end...
won't you like someone who can actually play short pitch stuff?![]()
SRT. Double the promise and performance. Include Tests here, and overseas performance against quality bowlers. Kohli has feasted on mediocre SL and Pakistani bowlers, and has shat while facing quality SA/Aus bowlers.name a player who has shown half the promise as kohli at such a young age?
Not really we have good emerging talent in the form of Azhar Ali,Nasir Jamshed and Afridi.
SRT. Double the promise and performance. Include Tests here, and overseas performance against quality bowlers. Kohli has feasted on mediocre SL and **** bowlers, and has shat while facing quality SA/Aus bowlers.
Control exactly what?Control mate..
Not very funny, my lord.
Please check his scores in all the final matches he has played and let me know if I am wrong. Also his average in WI and in Aus. Also, his average against Australia or South Africa (when not playing at home).
Kohli started at 6? R u sure?To play at 3 you have to be successful at 3. People think playing Umar up the order is going to make him a world class batsmen all of a sudden? No. Sorry, it won't. All great players start from the bottom. Ponting started at six. Kohli started at six. You earn your way up.
It is not like Pakistan haven't given a chance to Umar at 4 and he has failed most of the time.
Control exactly what?
I am new here, so please enlighten me - is pointing out the relevant flaws of a cricketer disallowed here?
mediocre SL and **** bowlers
Umer akmal is not really a power hitter. He is not a finisher. He is a player who can come in early and make sure we dont need a finisher or "power hitter" in the end.. Ponting had a very good strike rate too ,he could hit big sixes too ,australians never sent him down the order.. It is not neccessary that u should always have an anchor or a relatively defensive player at the top.Pakistan see Umar Akmal as their finisher... Even Asad Shafiq can come in at 4 (and do what Umar Akmal would do if he's at 4) But runs at the death is what Pakistan is looking at... Pakistan have always played their power hitters down the order... this is not anything new
Ah okay. Didn't see it in that way at all, and have corrected myself. Thanks for pointing out!In your early statement, you used some slang term for a Nation I suppose and it appeared ****, so just warning you... If you didn't, chill!
in tests,hes still at 5Kohli started at 6? R u sure?
in tests,hes still at 5
That 30+ in the WC final was an okay innings, nothing which shows 'special talent'. Was a pretty easy pitch to bat on, and had some okay bowlers barring Malinga. I was talking about his single digit averages in Tests in WI, and his 30 odd average against Australia in Tests.scored a good 37 in WC final wen he came in at 31-2 chasing 275
avg in WI-40 in Aus 54.avg v SA in SA-48.
only avg v Aus in Aus is bad.but nobody's perfect n we r talking about a young man.countries like England,NZ matter too.n hes done well v Pak in both Asia Cup n T20 which shows how much of a big match player he is
That 30+ in the WC final was an okay innings, nothing which shows 'special talent'. Was a pretty easy pitch to bat on, and had some okay bowlers barring Malinga. I was talking about his single digit averages in Tests in WI, and his 30 odd average against Australia in Tests.
Two things are clear about Kohli as of now:
a) He is very, very good against average bowlers and on flat tracks in low-pressure tournaments and does averagely in high pressure tournaments and in finals
b) He is pretty ordinary in overseas Tests and struggles against real fast bowlers/good quality bowlers in unfamiliar conditions.
Too sum up, still a long way to go before he gets all this adulation. Also, this is his purple patch. I shudder to think what he'll do when he is not in such good form (which is bound to come sooner or later).
That 30+ in the WC final was an okay innings, nothing which shows 'special talent'. Was a pretty easy pitch to bat on, and had some okay bowlers barring Malinga. I was talking about his single digit averages in Tests in WI, and his 30 odd average against Australia in Tests.
Two things are clear about Kohli as of now:
a) He is very, very good against average bowlers and on flat tracks in low-pressure tournaments and does averagely in high pressure tournaments and in finals
b) He is pretty ordinary in overseas Tests and struggles against real fast bowlers/good quality bowlers in unfamiliar conditions.
Too sum up, still a long way to go before he gets all this adulation. Also, this is his purple patch. I shudder to think what he'll do when he is not in such good form (which is bound to come sooner or later).