IndianWillow
T20I Debutant
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2010
- Runs
- 8,271
- Post of the Week
- 1
That may work with other here, not me.
Ashwin and any left armer are good ODI bowlers in Asia. Just like HAfeez, who is a nothing bowler in reality, but does his job in ODI's.
It's all about the conditions you are playing in. The only real good fast bowler in the match was Wahab Riaz, and he went for 4 overs 50 because his pace on that pitch worked for the batsman.
Still Amla 150 >> Kohli 183.
Ashwin was in poor form during that time. In 2012, Ashwin was one of the easier Indian bowlers to tackle, even in India. The English won a test series in India primarily because Ashwin was not in form, and was outbowled by both Swann and Panesar even on our hometracks.
And so Ajmal was no force on a subcontinental pitch? And Gul is a better bowler than Riaz in ODIs. Hafeez is also a very decent bowler in Asian conditions. Pakistan bowling for that match was much superior to India's. Kohli against that Indian bowling unit (against which YK got a 35 ball 50) could have scored a triple ton, not 183!