Gabbar Singh
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Runs
- 15,550
A fantastic innings - batted with the tail beautifully.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just scored his 38th ton and its 4 centuries in consecutive games. Unreal stuff.![]()
Don't know about talent, but Virat has the best temperament. I think, from PAK Umar & Shehzad can match him stroke by stroke, but Virat is groomed by a great batting coach at NCA Bangalore (notoriously tough for his unmindful students, believing in make or break, no half measures) in his early teens & has developed into very good batting habits, like conversion of starts & make the fielding side get you out. On contrary, Umar is trained by novices who think, either you drop youngsters to learn from club level domestic games or put him in pads isolated at a corner so that they don't repeat the same mistake.
Then comes the mentor, SRT/Rahul vs..........
Umar & Shehzad are lucky than Nazir that, at least, better late than never, they have got someone as batting coach, who knows a few things more than arranging nets. I told it early several times & stick to that, if anyone breaks SRT's ODI hundred record, first person 'll be Virat. I am a fan of the boy & like his attitude. He 'll be a tremendous Captain.
Less 7 years, and he is more than half way though - a tremendous Captain as well; for more than tactics & motivation most weight-age on Captaincy I give is for leading from the front; rest little is for fan boys to back their non-performing heroes (applicable everywhere - none needs to be sensitive for this line).
great call there but come on Shehzad and Akmal can match Kohli sot for shot - I dont think so![]()
They indeed did in 2011. In fact, Umar did better in 2010 - Shane Bond will tell you that.
Yes I watched that kings but With due respect there is hardly any comparison between Kohli's shot making and Umar both are very different players ... the key difference is the laser sharp ball placement along the ground , extreme use of wrists to generate power and just the overall asthetics of shot making.
Yes I watched that kings but With due respect there is hardly any comparison between Kohli's shot making and Umar both are very different players ... the key difference is the laser sharp ball placement along the ground , extreme use of wrists to generate power and just the overall asthetics of shot making.
Kohli is a great batsman, no doubt about it. But, He needs to work on his attitudes to gain respect from the average cricket fans. He acts like a kid on the field. It's difficult to even imagine that a grown up man can act like that. He has a lot to learn from the likes of Dhoni, Mushfiqur, Williamson about how to behave maturedly both on and off the field.
He has a lot to learn from the likes of Mushfiqur, about how to behave maturedly both on and off the field.
He will be an ok Type of Batsman , certainly not a Legend.
Kohli's aggression and attitude on the field is what makes him what he is. True, some fans from other countries don't like it. But who cares, most of us Indian fans don't want him to change at all. If he does, it will be massively disappointing for us.
Kohli is a great batsman, no doubt about it. But, He needs to work on his attitudes to gain respect from the average cricket fans. He acts like a kid on the field. It's difficult to even imagine that a grown up man can act like that. He has a lot to learn from the likes of Dhoni, Mushfiqur, Williamson about how to behave maturedly both on and off the field.
ODI century #40
Welcome to the elusive club Kohli.
To put this in context, Smith, Williamson and Root have a combined total of 33 ODI 100s
That's quite phenomenal.
Though his real competition in ODIs have been ABD, Amla, Warner.
Bit too much, no?Warner averages 43 he is as much a competitor to kohli as rayudu is a competitor to kohli
Kohli's success is much more amplified by lack of competition from other batsman. There isn't any batsman with similar stats as him today.
Sachin's stats are similar to many other players, and it's only longevity where he stands out.
I am convinced that he is the most complete batsman to have ever lived.
I am convinced that he is the most complete batsman to have ever lived.
virat is just on a different level.
tendulkar is more on the level of rohit sharma and shikhar dhawan
Scaling his 23 year achievement in 10 years means he is already within the touching distance. His career is not even half done.
That would be Tendulkar or Viv.
Dude I am not a Tendulkar fan but don't compare him to the likes of Rohit and Dhawan
Tendulkar was a GOAT as well.
Remember how he smoked the bowling attack of the three greatest fast bowlers Pakistan ever produced during the WC 2003 match in alien conditions of South Africa.
agreed but the w's were past their best.
That's quite phenomenal.
Though his real competition in ODIs have been ABD, Amla, Warner.
Need only 57 to complete 11K runs.
Looking forward against Pakistan.
He’s been outstaged so far by Warner and Williamson.
Kohli is hitting half centuries and his counterparts are hitting 150s
Where has his form gone?
He has been his usual brilliant self, but he hasn’t had the time to score big hundreds because of the consistency of the Indian openers.
He scored 80s and 70s against Australia and Pakistan because he came too late to the crease, and his 67 today on a sluggish pitch was a remarkable effort.
Absolutely. In both the matches against Australia and Pakistan, he came in to bat around the 25th over.
Yes, agree that he is batting very well and that he is near his best.
Just that his best is not better than others.
Si far, In this WC he is way behind Root and Williamson and just behind Smith.
Let’s see in witch order they will finish.
Hes evolved in the role of a proper leader this WC.. Hes not only concerned about how he is doing but also how to get the maximum from all of those around him.
People comparing Sharma with him are just being short sighted. The last match against AFG clearly demonstrated the different roles and responsibilities these two have in the Indian team. Sharma is remarkable but Kohli is just on another level. I honestly dont believe ive seen anyone quite like him.
Yes, agree that he is batting very well and that he is near his best.
Just that his best is not better than others.
Si far, In this WC he is way behind Root and Williamson and just behind Smith.
Let’s see in witch order they will finish.
His best is twice as good as anyone else. 41 hundreds at only 30.
Yes, agree that he is batting very well and that he is near his best.
Just that his best is not better than others.
Si far, In this WC he is way behind Root and Williamson and just behind Smith.
Let’s see in witch order they will finish.
Behind Smith?
How
Smith played a match winnings innings against West Indies, also his innings against Sri Lanka, coming in after 23 overs at 100/2 he gave the acceleration.
Kohli is yet to play an innings with such impact.
Both his fifties against Aus and Pak were fine innings but he came in very favorable conditions.
I will put Smith in front but it’s marginal, if someone thinks they are at the same level or even puts Kohli a little in front, it’s fine.
Agree but some times you need to focus on personal milestones aswell
This is good chance to him to reach 300 but he declared