Vikram1989
Local Club Star
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2022
- Runs
- 2,172
Sry bro I really took u as another subcontinent passionate fan with out logicCome on bro, understand sarcasm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Sry bro I really took u as another subcontinent passionate fan with out logicCome on bro, understand sarcasm
for now i am only talking about single aspect which is a shot selection in which saim is obviuosly better than him but yeah they both havent played much T20I cricket so cant really compare for now.Have you seen Jaiswal's performances in T20 cricket? There is literally no aspect of batting at which Ayub is better than him. None.
It's just fan obsession to create spite matchups simply because it's Pakistan and India.Saim and Jaiswal are not even a comparison anymore. One guy is not having a good time in the t20s and the other guy is almost phenomenal in ALL FORMATS and he is equally good in all IMO.
So after "talent", "range of shots" is the new unquantifiable thing with which Pakistani players are put on a higher pedal.
You couldn’t be more wrong even if you tried and you still have time to recover from this fumble before it is too late.for now i am only talking about single aspect which is a shot selection in which saim is obviuosly better than him but yeah they both havent played much T20I cricket so cant really compare for now.
Generational player? We are loosely using this word for every batsman who looks to be flamboyant. The same was said about Brevis. He set the under-19 World Cup on fire. Then showed some sparks in IPL. They even called him Baby AB. Where is he now? Same with Tom Prest from England. Prithvi Shaw looked like a million dollar when he was young. He looked like Sehwag clone. More recently in the county one-day cup, he showed a glimpse of why he had the hype. Saim has to do a lot more to earn the hype these guys had.Look, Saim is talented and is a generational player for Pakistan. Proper 3 dimensional player and like most modern Pakistan players, he's a very likeable lad as well.
Babar in the World Cup was inferior to all of Rohit, Kohli, Iyer, KL . But that doesn't mean he's not a generational batsman for Pakistan .
Basically for Pakistani fans, any player who looks cool and plays some unorthodox strokes happens to be a once in a lifetime generational player lol.Generational player? We are loosely using this word for every batsman who looks to be flamboyant. The same was said about Brevis. He set the under-19 World Cup on fire. Then showed some sparks in IPL. They even called him Baby AB. Where is he now? Same with Tom Prest from England. Prithvi Shaw looked like a million dollar when he was young. He looked like Sehwag clone. More recently in the county one-day cup, he showed a glimpse of why he had the hype. Saim has to do a lot more to earn the hype these guys had.
So after "talent", "range of shots" is the new unquantifiable thing with which Pakistani players are put on a higher pedal.
Too early to call. Give it 2-3 years.So, should this thread still be alive? Or is it going the U. Akmal vs. Kholi way?
So, should this thread still be alive? Or is it going the U. Akmal vs. Kholi way?
Jaiswal had 7-8 failures in the IPL before that hundred. Indians have plenty of patience with their players and give the right players the long run unlike Pakistan.
Way ahead? He's already crossed an entire milky way while saim is stuck in the stone ageJaiswal has took the world by storm and he is already leading this race and is way ahead of Saim.
That is one way of defining " way ahead" but yes, Jaiswal is winning this race by miles.Way ahead? He's already crossed an entire milky way while saim is stuck in the stone age
Yes, but again being generous, India is leagues ahead.That is one way of defining " way ahead" but yes, Jaiswal is winning this race by miles.
Almost every player from india's unit is superior to our batters tbh.Jaiswal is miles better than 90% of the Pakistani batters who played post 2010. No point of illogical comparisons.
You are looking glass half empty-full. Before those failures he had a stellar series vs England. Jaiswal is backed because he has a body of work: U 19’s, Domestics followed by standout performances in IPL and international cricket. This is why his failures are overlooked and he is given a longer rope. He is not just picked on some perceived “xfactor” or “talent”.Jaiswal had 7-8 failures in the IPL before that hundred. Indians have plenty of patience with their players and give the right players the long run unlike Pakistan.
I wouldn't mind being proven wrong or whatever but Ayub looks to me a copy of Ishan Kishan. In fact I checked their record just now and it's uncanny how identical their records are across all formats.
Kishan doesn't have the time against pace that Saim has and Saim is 4 years younger.
Ayub is very similar to Abhishek Sharma.
Left handed opening dashers who bowl slow left arm spin.
Who do you rate more between Abhishek and Yashaswi?Abhishek is in a different league. He has come through ranks. An under-19 world cup representative. Played a crucial part in winning the domestic championship for his state. Also his hitting technique is vastly superior with a lot of power.
Jaiswal. Technically one of the best going around. Especially backfoot defense is very good. Also leaves the ball very well. Already proved in several tournaments he has both temperament and technique. Now the real thing he has to fix is switching between formats.Who do you rate more between Abhishek and Yashaswi?
In domestic League, it's valid to compareAyub is very similar to Abhishek Sharma.
Left handed opening dashers who bowl slow left arm spin.
Kishan isn't a bad player bro, a bad player cannot score an odi 200 even if the next matches were failures.I have to apologize for my initial assessment. Ayub is NOT a copy of Ishan Kishan. Rather, he looks like a poor man's version of Ishan Kishan.
This is of course not to suggest he cannot kick off from here and carve a decent career for himself. But for now, he's too much of a leg side hack to merit much discussion.
Better thread would be Abdullah shafiq vs Jaiswal even though abd is Right handed.
Jaiswal may he more explosive but Abdullah already had centuries in both test and white ball even if the units didn't have the best bowling.
Case in point Abdullah has something to show for while saim doesn't and both are reasonably young still.
Abdullah has one odi 100 and 4 test centuries.Jaiswal has 2 test double tons and a T20I century.
Jaiswal has 2 test double hundreds against England and a test hundred in WI.Abdullah has one odi 100 and 4 test centuries.
That's why I'm saying Abdullah vs Jaiswal is a better comparison or at the very least Gill vs Abdullah
Ik jaiswal is superior, I never said he isn't. I'm just saying a better comparison for the thread would be ABD and not saim because saim hasn't achieved anythingJaiswal has 2 test double hundreds against England and a test hundred in WI.
Bro, please don't call shafique AbdIk jaiswal is superior, I never said he isn't. I'm just saying a better comparison for the thread would be ABD and not saim because saim hasn't achieved anything
Ik jaiswal is superior, I never said he isn't. I'm just saying a better comparison for the thread would be ABD and not saim because saim hasn't achieved anything
It's an abbreviation. I ain't ever comparing anyone to the ABD.Bro, please don't call shafique Abd
Jaiswal came from extreme poverty. He became a man at the age of 8.What is the difference in process? Both have talent, but Jaiswal is on the next level, and Saim is just struggling to find form. What is the special ingredient in Jaiswal's success?
He was born to an owner of a small hardware store? And he travelled to Mumbai to receive cricket training in an academy?Jaiswal came from extreme poverty. He became a man at the age of 8.
It wasn't PR. He was indeed poor albeit that pani puri story was overblown by media.He was born to an owner of a small hardware store? And he travelled to Mumbai to receive cricket training in an academy?
That's not poverty, If you're referring to the panpuri PR stunt nonsense which is overblown by Indian media, Lots of students take part tome work to make ends meet, that doesn't mean their poor.
Jaiswal isn't rich or anything, infact he was lower class I agree, but poverty is stretching it. Poverty is extreme. His father shop was earning money and he had enough to casually travel to Mumbai, people from poverty don't have fathers earning cash and travelling lol.
He was lower class aka below middle class, he wasnt poverty or a gipsy
He was lower class which means poor. And I only said the pani puri thing was overblown not the rest.It wasn't PR. He was indeed poor albeit that pani puri story was overblown by media.
Saim is underperforming because he is more concerned about showboating than grinding runs, but his talent is nowhere near Jaiswal’s.What is the difference in process? Both have talent, but Jaiswal is on the next level, and Saim is just struggling to find form. What is the special ingredient in Jaiswal's success?
Poverty and being poor are 2 separate things. A father owning a hardware shop and making ends meet is not the definition of poverty
It's PR stuff. People will say anything. Jeff bezos received 500,000 from his parents to start Amazon, Inflation adjusted that's 800,000 dollars today.His Interview before under 19 wc.He has spoken about selling panipuris,staying in a tent with out any basic facilities and lack of support/money from his family.
He said in the interview (2019 dec 13)when he was unknown quantity .do u think it was pr stuff when he didn't know what will happen to him in the future? He himself said some one have taken care of him from 17 (past 2 years of that interview) .so he must have gotten in to reasonable shape by then. Wasim jaffer also have taken care of jaiswal .If Any kid born after 2000 in india is not able to speak English means ,he is ultra poor and no educational background at all.It's PR stuff. People will say anything.
Also lastly, No person born in Poverty looks like jaiswal lol, look at kids in Africa and actual poor people in India and look at this guy.
Just like dhoni's story is exaggerated, anyone sane who does a bit of background check would realise he ain't poverty struck.
Saim is underperforming because he is more concerned about showboating than grinding runs, but his talent is nowhere near Jaiswal’s.
Jaiswal is the real deal. He is better than guys like Saeed Anwar, Ganguly and Dhawan let alone Saim.
Brother, it doesn't matter what I think. I'm fully aware of how Marketing and PR works.He said in the interview (2019 dec 13)when he was unknown quantity .do u think it was pr stuff when he didn't know what will happen to him in the future? He himself said some one have taken care of him from 17 (past 2 years of that interview) .so he must have gotten in to reasonable shape by then. Wasim jaffer also have taken care of jaiswal .If Any kid born after 2000 in india is not able to speak English means ,he is ultra poor and no educational background at all.
Jaiswal is definitely a real deal and will go on to have a good international career. Saim Ayub most probably will fade away soon.Jaiswal has a long way to go to be considered better than Anwar, Ganguly, Dhawan. All the 3 names mentioned were top batters.
Jaiswal is definitely a real deal and will go on to have a good international career. Saim Ayub most probably will fade away soon.
whatever he is ,lets hope he utilises his potentialBrother, it doesn't matter what I think. I'm fully aware of how Marketing and PR works.
If the kid can travel to Mumbai and has a father who owns a hardware shop does not classify as poverty. His father having one shop alone is enough to classify him to not be a poverty stricken kid.
Based on my observations of both technique, temperament, and shot selection, Jaiswal appears to have a wider range of shots, whereas Saim Ayub currently relies on one or two shots and is more limited as a player. Given this, Jaiswal seems to be a much better prospect in terms of potential.They are both guesses.
People hyped Gill to the moon and he’s struggling to keep up with it.
Based on my observations of both technique, temperament, and shot selection, Jaiswal appears to have a wider range of shots, whereas Saim Ayub currently relies on one or two shots and is more limited as a player. Given this, Jaiswal seems to be a much better prospect in terms of potential.
For a batsman at the beginning of his career, potential is often judged by three key factors: technique, temperament, and shot range. A batsman lacking in any of these areas is likely to be exposed by international-class bowlers, who have entire teams working with them to devise strategies against every player.