They being the panel;. My point is the appeal was to have the decision over turned. So it was up to the evidence provided and it had to be sufficient enough to overturn. If there was a chance that it was the correct decision then do you think they would have overturned? I am thinking along the lines of "beyond reasonable doubt".
I don't claim to know the appeals process however I do know that not many red cards are overturned in this day and age especially since VAR...unless its a howler. Which this was.
Also I think its important to note that Arsenal won the game so you cant really say we are "moaning" because we lost.
I didn't know about the Joelinton foul going to a panel, i moved on from it. Why did it go to a panel? Was it an official appeals panel? or was it some review people. I don't know the process that well. Even if it was deemed the wrong decision there were no repercussions with that one so not sure if them agreeing with the refs call made any difference to anything other than antagonise fans by saying it was a foul.
Honestly speaking. I have spoken to a lot of people about this, fans of different clubs. Seen lots of Podcasts with ex footballers, MOTD Ref Watch on Sky etc
Not 1 person said they thought it was a red and all said it was a horrific decision. Apart from you. LOL
I respect you sticking to your opinion but I think you might have black and white striped glasses this time