shaaik
First Class Star
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2010
- Runs
- 3,983
What's wrong with Hafeezs action then ??That is because both Ashwin and Jadeja have clean actions.
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's wrong with Hafeezs action then ??That is because both Ashwin and Jadeja have clean actions.
What's wrong with Hafeezs action then ??
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
Wasn't he tested before as well which he had passed so how can you say that he checked all his life.Yes. I don't have respect for chuckers.
And what do u base ur judgement on ??He is a chucker. Not as big a chucker as Ajmal, but still a chucker.
Ashwin and Jadeja are not chuckers.
Wasn't he tested before as well which he had passed so how can you say that he checked all his life.
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
And what do u base ur judgement on ??
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
No worries.
Many people believe many things, but they are not the one to call the shots.
As long as the concerned authority (the umpires) does not believe that Ashwin's action is suspect, there is no reason to test him.
Just like Junaid khan then
So u trust icc's testing procedure only when it supports your notion.He got away with it in 2011 due to systematic failure. The testing procedures were not refined and the ICC was not serious about chucking.
Yes his action deteriorated with time, but he has never had a clean action ever since he started playing for Pakistan.
Don't know how his action was in domestic cricket all those years ago. Probably chucked back then as well.
ICC were not serious about chuckers until the Big 3 takeover. However, Ajmal didn't survive for long once they got serious.
So u trust icc's testing procedure only when it supports your notion.
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
That's what I said in my very first post, no player from big 3 has ever had any issues since its inception even before big 3 players from india , aus , eng. have almost all the time hv had a smooth sailing.Based on the fact that the umpires have not reported Ashwin and Jadeja for chucking but did report Hafeez.
ICC were serious for during Murali days or are you saying he was a chucker? And the same could be said for Harbijan and even Saqlain
That's what I said in my very first post, no player from big 3 has ever had any issues since its inception even before big 3 players from india , aus , eng. have almost all the time hv had a smooth sailing.
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
Exactly my point as well , how wd you know that whether someone is chucking or not unless u test them. All the off spin bowlers should be tested randomly in the same manner as dope tests are conducted. Leaving it to on field umpires descreation is not fair at all.I trust ICC's testing procedure anyway.
I personally didn't think that Hafeez chucks but since the ICC says so, I agree.
If you look up my posts from 2013-2014, you will find that I was critical of Ajmal's action but not Hafeez's.
If the ICC deems Junaid's current action as legal, I will accept that he is not a chucker.
Exactly my point as well , how wd you know that whether someone is chucking or not unless u test them. All the off spin bowlers should be tested randomly in the same manner as dope tests are conducted. Leaving it to on field umpires descreation is not fair at all.
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
So u think they don't play ojha for his action ?That is because they don't play chuckers in their national teams and leave them home, like Ojha.
In Pakistan, we celebrate chuckers like heroes.
No worries.
Many people believe many things, but they are not the one to call the shots.
As long as the concerned authority (the umpires) does not believe that Ashwin's action is suspect, there is no reason to test him.
Then why not check all the off spin bowlers who bowl doosra ?It is not about me or you, it is about the umpires.
The umpires are the decision-makers and we have to take their word. If they see a chucker, they will report him.
It is not an anti-Pakistan conspiracy and it is neither a pro-Big 3 conspiracy.
Why should he?Just because you want him to be?
Lyon Moeen Ali Herath Jadeja Mishra Yasir Zulfiqar etc etc havent been tested either.
None of them admitted to chucking on purpose.
Many people believe Ashwin chucks hence he should be tested. Thanks for clearing things up
Who are these MANY people? Post few prominent names in this thread. Handful of conspiracy theorists from one country cannot dictate ICC.
Ashwin has one of cleanest action in game.
Who are these MANY people? Post few prominent names in this thread. Handful of conspiracy theorists from one country cannot dictate ICC.
Ashwin has one of cleanest action in game.
Where was that cleanest action when he was wearing sleeves in Asia Cup 2014
Ashwin wore full sleeves to mock chuckers.
Ashwin is most vocal against chuckers.
Ashwin said everyone was getting advantage and he made a claim that he didn't want to be left behind when asked about it in a press conference.
It was a very intelligent move, likes of Ashwin/Broad/Vaughan played huge role in curbing chucking menace.
He can say whatever he wants, he intentionally broke the rules in match situation. He will forever be known as a cheater.
And you can never trust a cheater, who is to say Ashwin won't start chucking again when the going gets tough for him. He did it before and got away with it. He will do it again.
Cricket is not yet BCCI's that Indian cricketers are free to invent their rules and decide when they can chuck and when they can't. Maybe they won't be punished due to indian influence but people will always call out the truth: Ashwin is a cheater.
What rules he broke ? Wearing full sleeves was symbolic, how can you accuse him of chucking without any evidence.
Ashwin is well educated person with good wit and humour, pompous at times. I don't like him. It was his way of bringing attention to chucking menace.
It's just a mystery he's never ever been tested. Does anyone know of a top flight chest on off spinner that hasn't been tested? Except Ashwin of course lol
Saqlain
He can say whatever he wants, he intentionally broke the rules in match situation. He will forever be known as a cheater.
And you can never trust a cheater, who is to say Ashwin won't start chucking again when the going gets tough for him. He did it before and got away with it. He will do it again.
Cricket is not yet BCCI's that Indian cricketers are free to invent their rules and decide when they can chuck and when they can't. Maybe they won't be punished due to indian influence but people will always call out the truth: Ashwin is a cheater.
I trust ICC's testing procedure anyway.
I personally didn't think that Hafeez chucks but since the ICC says so, I agree.
If you look up my posts from 2013-2014, you will find that I was critical of Ajmal's action but not Hafeez's.
If the ICC deems Junaid's current action as legal, I will accept that he is not a chucker.
What about all the wins Ajmal and Hafeez got blatantly throwing ?
Ashwin accepted chucking in 1 interview yet still did not get suspended
He never admitted to chucking. He just claimed that wearing long sleeves gave him unfair advantage while bowling. He never said that he exploited said unfair advantage.
Smart man Ashwin. Fooled all internet marks and left them fuming.
He said everyone is using their "elbow" so i will try that as well.None of them admitted to chucking on purpose.
You will not decide what is required.Is that why he admitted to chucking and got away with it?
If you ask me to start throwing the ball I'd find it vertically impossible let alone to do it in an international or IPL game - and with suck accuracy and guile to deceive the umpires.
The guy had proven he can chuck effectively - test required I'm afraid
Ajmal was not only a chucker but also a liar.
He said he had a deformed elbow due to which he cannot bowl with a clean action.
That proved to be a lying excuse because now he is able to bowl with a clean action and he did not undergo any surgical treatment.
So u think they don't play ojha for his action ?
Sent from my SM-N750 using Tapatalk
He can say whatever he wants, he intentionally broke the rules in match situation. He will forever be known as a cheater.
And you can never trust a cheater, who is to say Ashwin won't start chucking again when the going gets tough for him. He did it before and got away with it. He will do it again.
Cricket is not yet BCCI's that Indian cricketers are free to invent their rules and decide when they can chuck and when they can't. Maybe they won't be punished due to indian influence but people will always call out the truth: Ashwin is a cheater.
Who are these MANY people? Post few prominent names in this thread. Handful of conspiracy theorists from one country cannot dictate ICC.
Ashwin has one of cleanest action in game.
I have to say, the still pics from the First Test in the West Indies look terrible.
I suspect that, as with Saeed Ajmal, a previously mediocre off-spinner has become lethal after starting to chuck.
You know that still pics do not say anything about chucking?
Harsh but I would not disagree, as IIRC he claimed a deformed elbow (die to an accident?) and then all of a sudden the elbow 'undeformed' itself.
I dunno about the poster you asked this question of,but I think so.
I think the above is a classic example of refusing to look beyond the obvious,and to try and tar everyone with the same brush. Here's how it goes:
Situation: Three Pakistani players get convicted. Response - Hey look others are cheating too.
Situation: A Pakistani bowler gets called for chucking. Response-Hey Indian/Big 3 players chuck and have not been called.
Instead of looking inwards, instead of working with the process, instead of righting the situation, the emphasis is on blaming others.
Yes I do.
But I combine them with the experience over decades of mediocre finger spinners (from Tony Lock through to Saeed Ajmal) being transformed from toothless pie throwers to lethal spinners by starting to chuck.
It's as suspicious as a mediocre Flo Jo athlete suddenly becoming a world beater.
R Ashwin was a pie thrower until a year ago. And now for the last year he has suddenly become lethal.
No he wasn't. Check his numbers.
What was his average at the start of 2015?
What's your point?
What was his average at the start of 2015?
1) That no other spinner cheated the game on the whole.
2) Get ashwin tested.
Did he pass latest ICC bowling tests? Every bowler is chucker until they pass the test. No umpire will call Ashwin because BCCI is too powerful and they will shorten his umpiring career. That is why umpire should not have any role in calling bowlers for chucking. It should be random test like drug test in sports.
Nothing to do with Pakistan or Bangladesh, he cheated the game as a whole.
Can we please avoid discussing Ajmal here. This thread is about Ashwin. Ajmal, the magician actually had a genuine case - accident due to which arm was deformed and gave an illusion of chucking.
Show the statement where he said he was chucking. I am not looking for a blog or an article. I am looking for a quote.
This does not prove anything. He said others are taking advantage of the 15 degree rule and so will he. He never said he will cross the limit.
I know he is implying he can chuck too but it has been worded very smartly to avoid any ramifications.
Yea but any dunce can read between the lines
Otherwise whats the advantage lol if everyone is within the legal limits anyway.
Yea but any dunce can read between the lines
Otherwise whats the advantage lol if everyone is within the legal limits anyway.
Yeah but somehow most dunces don't understand that he was actually trying to point out the issue that a lot of finger spinners were chucking at the time.
Yea but any dunce can read between the lines
Otherwise whats the advantage lol if everyone is within the legal limits anyway.
^^ Where exactly in that interview does ashwin admit to cheating?
I trust ICC's testing procedure anyway.
I personally didn't think that Hafeez chucks but since the ICC says so, I agree.
If you look up my posts from 2013-2014, you will find that I was critical of Ajmal's action but not Hafeez's.
If the ICC deems Junaid's current action as legal, I will accept that he is not a chucker.
There's a big difference between "i may do it" and "i have done it".
Based upon former, you can't give verdict of guilty. Latter, easily.
There was a time in Bangladesh when you bowled with long sleeves. What was that about? You spoke about it in detail in the press conference, where you spoke about comparative advantage. Was that about utilising the 15-degree allowance?
As I said, forming rules is not my job; playing is. If there is a 15-degree rule to be used as an advantage, why should I lag behind? There is a precise advantage that I wanted to use. People started thinking I had gone mad but I did not take offence. I felt only mad people succeed in life and if you're mad about something and believe in something, you will come out on top. I felt to a greater degree that I did come out on top. If I hadn't ventured into those things, I would not have learned as much as I did