All of you are missing the key point here - what is conclusive in Cricket?
I am given LBW on something that pitched 51% with in line, 3rd Umpire 'll keep that. I am not given out for anything 49% within line, the call'll remain Not Out. Same for catches or any other form of dismissal.
Then they limit the DRS options - a mockery that was exposed in Kandy Test. Angelo went for couple of close calls, which could have easily given out & Aussies would have wasted Reviews (if they had any). Then Umpire makes a howler & whole stadium/world could see that - but the DRS policy doesn't allow to rectify that & had rain came couple of hours earlier at Kandy that day ........... you know.
I keep repeating that, DRS should be kept with Umpires. These days, 90% decisions remains with Umpires & many of them ends as one side being upset - take out the DRS appeal, whatever is given by Field Umpire should stand & player would accept that as part of the game. If the Umpire (both on field or 3rd Umpire) is not sure, or can notice a gross mistake - field umpire can cross check or even can call back the batsman (or give him out) before batsman leaves the field or the next ball is bowled.
They are calling back batsman being dismissed of an un-called No Ball.
)
