Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Augustus said:I'm all for guys playing naturally, but if I were England captain right now, Pietersen would find himself on the receiving end of a bollocking that wouldn't end till tomorrow. Stupid dismissal.
kablooee87 said:50 up.
Whats the thing with Shah? Nasser also mentioned him, but do u really think he is a capable TEST batsmen?Robert said:That's the end of Shah's career then (unless he replaces Vaughan).
Good for Wobbles, he was an inch from being dropped and now he's forced England into a position where they can win the match.
Mohsin_Pak786 said:I know the pitch was suppose to break up but come on! Why waste the new ball?
lollol said:Kallis gone
From a full-toss
He really must've been nervous or something else, cause it didnt see such a good delivery to me![]()
sightscreen is low and his bowling arm goes above it. something with blue seats at the end too maybe.lollol said:Ok, flintoff is bowling really good.
But the batsmen arent picking his full deliveries at all? Whats happening there????? Sure, he bowled great, dont get me wrong, but the way which the batsmen react......
U must be blind than, if u cant see SOMETHING is wrongAugustus said:What a whinger. No-one else has had problems with the sight-screen that I've seen, at least not for more than one ball (McKenzie). If he thinks it should have been called a no-ball on height then he needs an anatomy lesson - you couldn't possibly be lbw to a ball that was over waist height. Idiot.
The Amla decision was a shocker, but I'm grateful for it.
Its a fair game, ofcourse the umpires are making sure it is!! Both teams have played under the same conditions.TurkishCricketFan said:What is wrong with the sight screen? And was it the same when England were batting? If not this is quite pathetic gamesmanship.
lollol said:Its a fair game, ofcourse the umpires are making sure it is!! Both teams have played under the same conditions.
But i think its related to flintoff's height, im not sure cause i just joined the match
And it was....lollol said:28.6 Panesar to Prince, no run, delivery looped up down the leg side, Prince goes on the backfoot and looks to flick it away, HUGE APPEAL!! for caught behind, they think it is off the glove, the umpire doesn't, Panesar might just be on the border line of appealing and trying to intimidate the umpire!!!
This actually seemed to have gloved it...![]()
Yeah, he is indeed.....TurkishCricketFan said:surely Morkel is as tall as Freddie ?
anyways this kind of things just leaves a sour taste, but if England batted in the same conditions can't really complain that much.
Can u tell me more about the terrible umpiring? Was it really that bad???Hooker said:England will win I think but is this victory in the spirit of the game ??? i think not , this is a sad day for cricket it really is a shame that they couldnt fight this out without the advantage of poor sight screening and terrrible umpiring.
Could u imagine if England were on the recieving end I dont think Beefy would be to happy .
lollol said:Im sure some would say thats its not in the spirit of the game, but i believe its perfectly right, as the ENG batsmen also played in these conditions!
lollol said:SAF can still win this.....
As long a smith is there...
For us its simple after seeing the replays, but the umpire needs to be certain about it.wanted_desi said:OK that was out, since smith didn't offer shot. SMith very lucky man here
lollol said:cars, why do u support SAF btw?