mosh101
Test Debutant
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2012
- Runs
- 14,381
86 lead ! Tricky game this :/
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Nothing will save England now..
They had their chances but now India have upper hand..
They are not able to chase 142 against Pak....
can any one tell me the difference between 86 and 50..
What a donkeys tail we have! Even the Bangladeshi tailenders are better than this. Another 30 runs would have been crucial. 30 runs less in the 4th innings to chase
Well, when England's innings began I would have jumped at an 86 lead.
Yeah but when Kev had India on the ropes, we were looking at lead of 200 and possibly an innings victory! Now we will have one tricky chase in the last innings.Well, when England's innings began I would have jumped at an 86 lead.
Nope ot was Broad. He refused to take the single and shoulf have offered his own wicket.
Yeah but when Kev had India on the ropes, we were looking at lead of 200 and possibly an innings victory! Now we will have one tricky chase in the last innings.
Can any one tell me the difference between 86 and 50..
Is this difference too huge...say like 100 or 2000
Please buddy ask your time to show a bit of mercy on EnglandBetter you wont keep any more hopes..chase wont be less than 275...
Maybe you should look at the Ind vs WI match last time here and you'll know there is a whole lot of difference between 50 and 51 runs, forget about 50 and 86.
Can any one tell me the difference between 86 and 50..
Is this difference too huge...say like 100 or 2000
31 overs left for the day & 178 on day 4 & 5 making it a total of 209 overs . A result only possible if we get bowled out in around 109 overs or less .
i will make myself clear..
I am not against england side..but indian team is too superior for them in indian conditions
eh cant think of a test match where a team led by that much.
Lol....
If this match wont get result none will have
.
50 overs are more than enough to bowl England out in 2nd innings..
Its for some peopke who thought lead will be over 150..
I predicted 50 runs lead during lunch session....
) ) )
If this is too superior situation for you, then your standards are very low.
and you predicted England would be 150 all out in the first innings.
We lost our last 5 wickets for 31 runs, now that's really sh*t batting. We should've scored 100 runs between our last 5 batsmen.
Need big contributions from Sehwag and Pujara. I don't have much faith in anybody else.
Anderson trying to exploit Gambhir's weakness outside the off side.
Barring KP and Cookie, all your batsmen failed! Be happy for 400..lol
You guys always criticising the opponents but it's just Pujara and Ashwin who scored for India and every other batsmen failed for you as well.
I'm disappointed because our tail got 110 and 50 in the last inns but failed here and I also know we are better than this.
india wll score 400 and england will be all out 150
What a donkeys tail we have! Even the Bangladeshi tailenders are better than this. Another 30 runs would have been crucial. 30 runs less in the 4th innings to chase
Gambhir and Tendulkar are walking wickets, Sehwag and Pujara are the big scalps. Come on Monty.
You guys always criticising the opponents but it's just Pujara and Ashwin who scored for India and every other batsmen failed for you as well.
I'm disappointed because our tail got 110 and 50 in the last inns but failed here and I also know we are better than this.
lol I love it when people say 'minus two or three players and look at the England team then'...the whole idea is that a team has 11 players in it and some of them are particularly good, minus Sehwag and Pujara from India and they would suck too
We need 2-3 wickets before scores are level.