I do not think it makes sense to point towards his record in Pakistan as proof that he relied on good pitches to get wickets. Had he played more, he surely would have improved upon this record. Considering he only played 4 total Tests at home, even one decent series at home would have dramatically brought down his averages.In Pakistan Asif has played 4 tests. He didn't take any fifer as well. ONe test he clicked was the pitch where IRfan Pathan took a hatrick. I was responding to the post which said he is some kind of a bowler who can take pitch out of the equation. No he can't. He does well when there is a bit of seam movement of the pitch.
When you are already dealing with a small sample size, it makes even less sense to dive into subsets of that sample size. They will be too small to actually be meaningful.The only place where he played more Test matches is in England (7 Tests). He played just 23 Tests, so it's obvious the sample size will be small in most places.
He is not a great, merely an interesting "what if" story.The sample size is too low to find any flaws, but is large enough to call him a great.
The legend of Asif developed because some legendary batsmen like AB de Villiers, Hashim Amla, and Kevin Pietersen declared him the best bowler they had ever faced. The fact that these amazing batsmen who faced legendary bowlers themselves declared Asif the best means something. Even Imran Khan stated that he had never seen a new ball bowler as good as Asif and surely you would not deny that Imran Khan has a good eye for fast bowling talent.