I havent been following this mate, but why has it been disastrous, in your view?
Because we displayed club-standard shot selection to get bowled out on the first day of the series for a pitiful score, which was put into its most brutal perspective when NZ practically trebled our total in response. Thankfully a few cloudbursts saved us from an upset.
The second Test swapped the roles around, but even when rain supposedly came to the rescue of Frodo, Bilbo and co we had only taken 2 second innings wickets for 150, a frankly diabolical effort with a large first innings lead to play with.
Cook in spite of his very useful hundred has looked distracted. India is usually such a hopeless space for us that he knew he would never be judged on it - to win while playing so well was a bonus for him. But in the eyes of the world, this year with its back-to-back Ashes actually matters, and I fear that he is struggling to cope with the pressure.
To be fair to Alistair he has been unable to conduct an operation from home soil yet, which will do plenty to settle his nerves and focus his mentality, and also the Aussies are hardly in great shape either - but something has just not felt right in this series. When we lost to Pakistan I kind of knew that we were going to lose to South Africa as well: beyond results, it's the manner of things that strike you.
The bowling has been worse yet. This is a lineup which in Swann's absence appears to have no constantly ticking cricket brain at its core - on this basis, far from being another overhyped English cricketer I would consider Graeme to be underrated. His immense skill and streetwise Middle England intelligence helps get these arrogant little boys into order.
Stuart Broad is undoubtedly a bright and talented guy but since his exit from a high-class private school has appeared to possess the maturity and grace under pressure of a 14 year-old, and James Anderson is a typical Burnley lad with all of the admirably feckless commitment in the world but not much between the ears, and this adds up to a career bowling average of 30 despite playing much of his cricket under clouds as a swing bowler. At the end of the day, a mediocre bowling record is mediocre. And don't even get me started on Monty Panesar, the spin bowler who just bowls the same delivery with the same flight at the same pace 120 times a day and thus appears to have learned absolutely nothing about Test cricket in seven years.
Sorry but it's supposed to be the second best side in the world versus the eighth best. We can take solace from the fact that South Africa only managed a 1-0 win from the same tour, but their superiority was notable throughout the series. This series however has looked worryingly balanced, perhaps even slightly in New Zealand's favour, and these facts have to be dealt with and addressed. I'd actually propose the idea that going on to lose the match would not only be what England deserves, it would be good for them.
All this talk of flat pitches being the ruination of our cricket is insolent and embarrassing when not only have we played pretty well on flat pitches in Australia and India, but more to the point our batting and bowling in New Zealand of all places has been so palpably poor. My feeling is that the England team failed to research the difference in both conditions compared to previous tours of NZ - there are few bowler-friendly pitches now - and personnel: the New Zealand team for the first time in 20 years looks fresh, unspoiled, confident, and dynamic.
At present I'm seeing a lot of negatives, but hopefully (win, lose or draw) a few more positives appear over the next three days. What we've seen from New Zealand has been good for the game of cricket, then, but it has also served England some harsh lessons which they need to take more seriously than they took the Hobbits in order to hold on to the Ashes.