Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cummins made 63 against us and almost threatened to chase us down along with Hazlewood in 4th innings.Outside of Hazlewood, almost everyone in Aussie lineup can bat. Their tail is good enough to score 100 runs between them.
There was some chance but its not like keeper is missing easy byes.Well then explain? How is it not a wide if keeper has no chance of reaching it?
This is the keeper you guys have screamed and wanted in your side over Sarfaraz. He has to be good enough to stop those??? Sarfaraz missing them was the reason why Rizwan should be back?!There was some chance but its not like keeper is missing easy byes.
Me? I don't care who is keeping.This is the keeper you guys have screamed and wanted in your side over Sarfaraz. He has to be good enough to stop those??? Sarfaraz missing them was the reason why Rizwan should be back?!
It fell on the ground after it hit his palms. Correct decision.Not sure I agree with that decision, seemed like out to me
So poor.Half-centutry!
It’s not the same pitch or the same bowling so you can’t compare the number of byes per match so easily like that.This is the keeper you guys have screamed and wanted in your side over Sarfaraz. He has to be good enough to stop those??? Sarfaraz missing them was the reason why Rizwan should be back?!
Also, Sarf is getting old. How old is he?It’s not the same pitch or the same bowling so you can’t compare the number of byes per match so easily like that.
Rizwan is clearly the better wicket keeper. This is accepted by not just Pakistani cricket fans but also analysts and fans in all countries across the entire world. The whole talk of the first Test even amongst the Australian analysts was why Rizwan did not play in place of Sarfraz.
Yeah Sarfraz was good in his prime but even in his prime he was horrible in overseas conditions.Also, Sarf is getting old. How old is he?
I am not sure he should be the one playing for Pakistan when Rizwan is doing reasonably well.
Amazing stuff to go from 200-3 to all out just over 300 is great. Thought they’d get at least 350. If we bat well we actually have a shot now.
Also, Sarf is getting old. How old is he?
I am not sure he should be the one playing for Pakistan when Rizwan is doing reasonably well.
LOL, but reflex will become a bigger factor on bouncy pitches for Sarf. I remember him being good on low bounce pitches against spin. I am not sure why some posters are pushing for Sarf here and why he actually played in the first test.I’m not a Sarfraz fan but have you heard of a film called The Curious Case of Benjamin Button?
It's been after a long long time that Pak pace unit has bowled in partnership throughout the inning. And they did reasonably well I'd say here I'd say. Shan's captaincy has been very good so far.I am not giving an excuse. Infact, just adding historical context. If anything, it tells how mediocre the fast bowling has been in Australia. On pitches with not much movement , the bowling has been completely toothless in Australia. They failed to utilise the pace and bounce on offer in Australia due to poor lengths, lack of control and pace.
I just hope Pakistan doesnt get bundled out for 100.Score is not 400 so Pakistan is in the game here. Needs to bat well and bat long.
Lets judge the pitch after both sides have batted.
I think it has a lot to do with conditions. They bowled well but gave away far too many easy runs as well.It's been after a long long time that Pak pace unit has bowled in partnership throughout the inning. And they did reasonably well I'd say here I'd say. Shan's captaincy has been very good so far.
Yah, just sitting there will eventually get you out. Ball was moving entire time so needs to look for runs without being reckless.I just hope Pakistan doesnt get bundled out for 100.
The pitch has quickened on day 2. The only way to go on this is by attacking.
How to attack though? It is almost suicidal to drive on this pitch unless it is really full. They hardly give any short and wide deliveries. You can't just attack if the ball isn't there.I just hope Pakistan doesnt get bundled out for 100.
The pitch has quickened on day 2. The only way to go on this is by attacking.
You don't need to do that but you do need to always look for runs. Some balls comes where you can score, but if you are just looking to survive then you don't score even on those balls.How to attack though? It is almost suicidal to drive on this pitch unless it is really full. They hardly give any short and wide deliveries. You can't just attack if the ball isn't there.
Perhaps the best way to go is take middle leg stump guard and start taking chances on short of length deliveries by throwing your bat with horizontal bat. Just hope you don't get thin edges!
Those 'some' balls are few and far between.You don't need to do that but you do need to always look for runs. Some balls comes where you can score, but if you are just looking to survive then you don't score even on those balls.
LOL, but reflex will become a bigger factor on bouncy pitches for Sarf. I remember him being good on low bounce pitches against spin. I am not sure why some posters are pushing for Sarf here and why he actually played in the first test.
One weird thing I noticed was all of the Australian team’s pacers were down in the last match as well.Starc 127 kph first ball, learning from the maestro Shaheen.
Starc did tocuh 145 kph during some of his spells.One weird thing I noticed was all of the Australian team’s pacers were down in the last match as well.
Is it just something about the Australian pitches?
lol Rawalpindi highway specialist exposed by GillyImam’s average against the short ball is the most useless stat ever.
Good to see Gilchrist suss out why it’s so high.
I meant that may be the actual ground and pitch is harder on the legs in some way?Starc did tocuh 145 kph during some of his spells.
Cummins' pace was a bit down, I agree.
But in any case, the speed is measured in the air after the ball is released by the bowler. So cant be pitch-related.
But one thing that is clearly noticeable is the difference in pace off the pitch. Australian bowlers mostly don't lose that much pace off the pitch while with Pakistan bowlers, you can clearly feel the lack of pace after the ball pitches.
Thanks for the clarification.I meant that may be the actual ground and pitch is harder on the legs in some way?
Just weird seeing both sides have lower pace than usual.
Same goes for Abdullah to be honest. Infact, from what I am seeing, Imam looks more assured than Abdullah.Imam looks like he'll get out at any moment.