What's new

Pakistan vs South Africa | 2nd Test | 23/11/2010 | Abu Dhabi | Day 4 : Session 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
No reason to sweep. Another one gone.

Let's hope our remaining wickets can put on some runs
 
there's glove and thats exactly what i thought of the first replay
chalooooo!
 
poor lbw decision again- replay shows it hit glove first. I really want URDS at times like these
 
Last edited:
117.5
Harris to Umar Gul, OUT, plays one sweep too many, round the wicket, tossed up, he bent low to sweep it square, missed, it didn't turn at all, struck him on the pads and he was caught plumb. But replays show it flicked his glove on the way to the pad, we need to take a look at it again.
 
these umpires or what
i stand by my opinion even more now..the little respect i had for the tradition of umpires has gone..so my opinion which is to decide everything by technology even no balls
 
do Umpires have some personal grudge against Pakistan- there is no other explanation for all these terrible decisions
 
I have a feeling that even if Pakistan gets out before 384, SA will not enforce the follow on. We have managed to bat out 100+ overs in 2 consecutive innings (BIG achievement in my eyes), and they'd be aware of that.

My guess is that if they get the last 2 wickets within the next 20 minutes, they'd bat until maybe tea and score about 150 runs, and try to get Pakistan out. What do you guys think?
 
starchild said:
I have a feeling that even if Pakistan gets out before 384, SA will not enforce the follow on. We have managed to bat out 100+ overs in 2 consecutive innings (BIG achievement in my eyes), and they'd be aware of that.

My guess is that if they get the last 2 wickets within the next 20 minutes, they'd bat until maybe tea and score about 150 runs, and try to get Pakistan out. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

Why won't they enforce the follow on?
 
starchild said:
I have a feeling that even if Pakistan gets out before 384, SA will not enforce the follow on. We have managed to bat out 100+ overs in 2 consecutive innings (BIG achievement in my eyes), and they'd be aware of that.

My guess is that if they get the last 2 wickets within the next 20 minutes, they'd bat until maybe tea and score about 150 runs, and try to get Pakistan out. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

No, I think they will take it
 
starchild said:
I have a feeling that even if Pakistan gets out before 384, SA will not enforce the follow on. We have managed to bat out 100+ overs in 2 consecutive innings (BIG achievement in my eyes), and they'd be aware of that.

My guess is that if they get the last 2 wickets within the next 20 minutes, they'd bat until maybe tea and score about 150 runs, and try to get Pakistan out. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...
Yeh I was thinking along those lines but from Pakistans point of view, win is now very unlikely- we will bat for a draw
 
They have been bowling a lot... follow-on seems to be on if we get out before the target.
 
Ryan: "I think someone should tell the pakistani batsman that Paul Harris has never had a ball spin. So they should stop playing for the spin as Harris cant even turn a door knob. Treat him as a real slow medium pacer play the line of the ball and they will be OK."

Except that in the first Test he surprised a couple of batsmen with turn
 
starchild said:
I have a feeling that even if Pakistan gets out before 384, SA will not enforce the follow on. We have managed to bat out 100+ overs in 2 consecutive innings (BIG achievement in my eyes), and they'd be aware of that.

My guess is that if they get the last 2 wickets within the next 20 minutes, they'd bat until maybe tea and score about 150 runs, and try to get Pakistan out. What do you guys think?
Click to expand...

so what if pak can bat for 100 overs doesn't mean they wouldn't force follwon. if pak get out before 384. it means pak would trail by more then 200 runs. even if sa collaps that would be at least for 200 runs. that means pak would need to make more then 400 runs at least. that means pak would need to bat for at least 5 sessions. that means 5 days over. some times i wonder some ppers who's posting on PP even watch cricket.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

G
Australia vs India | 2nd Test | Perth | Dec 14-18, 2018 | Day 4 Thread
4 5 6
Replies
449
Views
11K
wrongun
W
A
Pakistan hit back with 2 wickets after being bowled out for 282 on Day 1 of the 2nd Test
5 6 7
Replies
550
Views
21K
gazza619
gazza619
A
Report - 2nd Test, Day 1 : Azhar Ali stands strong but Australia edge ahead on rain-hit day
Replies
26
Views
2K
Syed1
Syed1
A
Report - 2nd Test, Day 3 : Azhar Ali (105) and Misbah-ul-Haq (99) help Pakistan to edge ahead
Replies
8
Views
1K
Ami
A
A
Report - 3rd Test, Day 2: Pakistan post 376 after Azhar's hundred, fifties from Misbah and Sarfraz
Replies
6
Views
2K
khurram39
K
Back
Top