Prime Minister's XI v England - Canberra

ahsan17 · Nov 10, 2006

abdul9383 said:
Mahmood

9-0-97-1

)

)

)

infamous9383 · Nov 10, 2006

ahsan17 said:
) ) )

if they gave him one more over he would surely break the record for most runs given up

ahsan17 · Nov 10, 2006

abdul9383 said:
if they gave him one more over he would surely break the record for most runs given up

This could be the most runs given in a spell of 9 overs :))

Sadly it doesn't count because its not an official ODI :6:

Amir · Nov 10, 2006

And the Ashes are under way!

UJ · Nov 10, 2006

Good innings by Jacques, another reason why he should be opening ahead of Watson or Katich!

nadeem · Nov 10, 2006

Guys how fast were mahmood and tait today plz?

UJ · Nov 10, 2006

Daoud said:
Just lie down on the coach, and relax

So thats the coaching technique they're using these days huh?

Amjid Javed · Nov 10, 2006

Well yet another limited overs game and another shameful defeat for england!

They should quit playing short version of game!

Rob H · Nov 10, 2006

)

)

)

)

)

)

Thanks Saj, you can take your plane home now. Hopeless performance by England but i'm not looking into it too much. We've taking bashings in warm up matches in nearly every away tour. Just good to see Flintoff got 10 overs under his belt.

UJ · Nov 10, 2006

Tait looked good. I think the ball that got Flintoff was 150.8 Km/h. Not bad at all.

Asim2Good · Nov 10, 2006

abdul9383 said:
Mahmood

9-0-97-1

& I heard from freind that one British newspaper wrote 2 page article on him with headline "Swing King" :))

)

)

James · Nov 10, 2006

Complete rubbish. I'm trying not to read too much into it because we always play like mongs in the practice games, but it's embarassing to wake up to scorecards like that.

in_cutter · Nov 10, 2006

Why did Flintoff allow Panesar to bowl only 3 overs? Looks like he wants Giles in the team!

p.s that Jaques guy is a class act :19:

Hash · Nov 10, 2006

Good performance by England.

the_love_machine · Nov 10, 2006

God, this Ashes series will be no contest. Even our prime ministers XI can thrash England lol, so just imagine what pain our best XI would inflict upon them. If your an English fan, stay well clear of the ground, T.V and news...hahah

Easa · Nov 10, 2006

)

) Mahmood.

England have been thrashed.

the Great Khan · Nov 10, 2006

shaun tate looked really pacy..man aussies got some major pace riches at the moment..johnson,tait,lee...

Taurus · Nov 10, 2006

Not worried about the result.

Worried that we chose to bowl on a belter. Worried that Panesar was given his usual "opportunity" when Freddie is captain. Why wasn't Strauss picked as captain? I think we've won two matches in any form of the game with Flintoff as the captain.

Oh, and I'm worried that we chose to play a One-Day game, when we're rubbish at them, and would blatantly lose.

And Trescothick looks absolute rubbish - the Cook/Bell/Collingwood debate may soon not be an issue if he carries on like this. Just push Cook up to where he belongs. Not sure who would bat at 3 though then.

Same old Geraint, too...

Daoud · Nov 10, 2006

Beichara Saj. Awesome stuff by the PM's XI. Well, its not going to get any worse so the only way is up from here

the Great Khan · Nov 10, 2006

personally i thinkl strauss is a better captain..and i liked how how he used monty..freddy just doesnt seem that clever as a captain...i fear the aussies are gonna unleash major vengeance on england in this series!!

infamous9383 · Nov 10, 2006

Englands sami pefoming worse than Paksitani sami. I thought i never would see the day

PlanetPakistan · Nov 10, 2006

ENG lost the warm up in SA yet won the series then they lost the warmup in PAK but still should have won the 1st test so i am not going to read too much in to this result however Jacques and Tait deserve a lot of credit!

infamous9383 · Nov 10, 2006

PlanetPakistan said:
ENG lost the warm up in SA yet won the series then they lost the warmup in PAK but still should have won the 1st test so i am not going to read too much in to this result however Jacques and Tait deserve a lot of credit!

just a sign of things to come

Rickz · Nov 10, 2006

England has got better stuff to come........they will bounce back hard.

OZGOD · Nov 10, 2006

UJ said:
Good innings by Jacques, another reason why he should be opening ahead of Watson or Katich!

If he keeps doing this eventually the muppets in charge will have no choice but to pick him.

Re: the game, good hitout for the PMs. But the Poms were likely rusty. They normally take a long time to wind themselves up.

OZGOD · Nov 10, 2006

Here's the card:

Code:

England tour of Australia - Tour Match
Prime Minister's XI v England XI 	2006/07 season

Played at Manuka Oval, Canberra, on 10 November 2006 (50-over match)

Result Prime Minister's XI won by 166 runs

							
 Prime Minister's XI innings (50 overs maximum) 	R 	M 	B 	4s 	6s 	SR
	PA Jaques 	c Cook b Collingwood 	112 	166 	110 	9 	2 	101.81
wicket-keeper 	TD Paine 	c wicket-keeperJones b Flintoff 	6 	22 	16 	1 	0 	37.50
	MJ Cosgrove 	c Strauss b Giles 	24 	54 	34 	4 	0 	70.58
	TR Birt 	b Mahmood 	40 	53 	45 	2 	2 	88.88
	SE Marsh 	not out 	78 	96 	56 	5 	1 	139.28
	AC Voges 	c Pietersen b Anderson 	39 	43 	32 	4 	0 	121.87
captain 	CL White 	not out 	30 	17 	14 	1 	3 	214.28
	    Extras 	(b 1, lb 1, w 9, nb 7) 	18 					
								
	    Total 	(5 wickets; 50 overs; 228 mins) 	347 					

Did not bat BR Dorey, AM Ritchard, SW Tait, BW Hilfenhaus

Fall of wickets1-15 (Paine, 5.3 ov), 2-75 (Cosgrove, 16.4 ov), 3-162 (Birt, 29.1 ov), 4-214 (Jaques, 36.4 ov), 5-292 (Voges, 46.2 ov)

							
	 Bowling 	O 	M 	R 	W 	Econ 	
	 JM Anderson 	10 	1 	65 	1 	6.50 	(2w)
	 A Flintoff 	10 	0 	55 	1 	5.50 	(1nb, 1w)
	 SI Mahmood 	9 	0 	97 	1 	10.77 	(6nb, 4w)
	 MS Panesar 	3 	0 	17 	0 	5.66 	
	 AF Giles 	8 	0 	53 	1 	6.62 	(2w)
	 PD Collingwood 	10 	0 	58 	1 	5.80 	

							
 England XI innings (target: 348 runs from 50 overs) 	R 	M 	B 	4s 	6s 	SR
	ME Trescothick 	c White b Tait 	2 	3 	6 	0 	0 	33.33
	AJ Strauss 	c Hilfenhaus b Tait 	67 	92 	67 	12 	0 	100.00
	AN Cook 	c wicket-keeperPaine b Hilfenhaus 	4 	24 	14 	0 	0 	28.57
	PD Collingwood 	c Jaques b White 	35 	53 	41 	5 	0 	85.36
	KP Pietersen 	c wicket-keeperPaine b Hilfenhaus 	7 	15 	10 	1 	0 	70.00
captain 	A Flintoff 	b Tait 	1 	9 	3 	0 	0 	33.33
wicket-keeper 	GO Jones 	not out 	13 	70 	41 	0 	0 	31.70
	AF Giles 	run out (White/wicket-keeperPaine) 	13 	30 	19 	0 	0 	68.42
	SI Mahmood 	st wicket-keeperPaine b White 	22 	22 	22 	0 	2 	100.00
	JM Anderson 	lbw b Ritchard 	0 	4 	4 	0 	0 	0.00
	MS Panesar 	c White b Ritchard 	1 	6 	9 	0 	0 	11.11
	    Extras 	(lb 3, w 9, nb 4) 	16 					
								
	    Total 	(all out; 38.4 overs; 169 mins) 	181 					

Fall of wickets1-3 (Trescothick, 0.6 ov), 2-24 (Cook, 6.6 ov), 3-107 (Collingwood, 19.6 ov), 4-119 (Strauss, 21.5 ov), 5-123 (Pietersen, 22.5 ov), 6-124 (Flintoff, 23.1 ov), 7-146 (Giles, 30.5 ov), 8-177 (Mahmood, 35.4 ov), 9-178 (Anderson, 36.4 ov), 10-181 (Panesar, 38.4 ov)

							
	 Bowling 	O 	M 	R 	W 	Econ 	
	 SW Tait 	8 	2 	21 	3 	2.62 	(1nb, 3w)
	 BW Hilfenhaus 	8 	1 	49 	2 	6.12 	(3nb, 3w)
	 BR Dorey 	5 	0 	27 	0 	5.40 	
	 AM Ritchard 	4.4 	0 	24 	2 	5.14 	
	 CL White 	7 	0 	32 	2 	4.57 	(3w)
	 AC Voges 	2 	0 	13 	0 	6.50 	
	 MJ Cosgrove 	4 	0 	12 	0 	3.00

Taurus · Nov 10, 2006

Some things never change, eh? Like this:

"Kevin Pietersen looked like he'd left an important part of his brain somewhere in a field in Hampshire." (Rob Smyth)

OZGOD · Nov 11, 2006

Augustus said:
Not worried about the result.

Worried that we chose to bowl on a belter. Worried that Panesar was given his usual "opportunity" when Freddie is captain. Why wasn't Strauss picked as captain? I think we've won two matches in any form of the game with Flintoff as the captain.

Oh, and I'm worried that we chose to play a One-Day game, when we're rubbish at them, and would blatantly lose.

And Trescothick looks absolute rubbish - the Cook/Bell/Collingwood debate may soon not be an issue if he carries on like this. Just push Cook up to where he belongs. Not sure who would bat at 3 though then.

Same old Geraint, too...

The PM XI game is a traditional game that's always been played against a touring side though. As for Panesar, I reckon Flintoff was hiding him from the OZ, the way the OZ sometimes hide Warne if he has this "great new delivery he's been working on".

James · Nov 11, 2006

Augustus said:
Some things never change, eh? Like this:

"Kevin Pietersen looked like he'd left an important part of his brain somewhere in a field in Hampshire." (Rob Smyth)

He is a great player but a nob head. He only seems to be up for it when there is 1 or 2 fantastic bowlers to play against, especially when they are a spinner. He plays like a donkey when he is actually required to apply himself and treat 'lesser' bowlers with respect.

Good points on Fred's captaincy too, but lets not get ahead of ourselves. A lot can still happen ahead of the 1st test (and it had better do!)

James · Nov 11, 2006

OZGOD said:
The PM XI game is a traditional game that's always been played against a touring side though. As for Panesar, I reckon Flintoff was hiding him from the OZ, the way the OZ sometimes hide Warne if he has this "great new delivery he's been working on".

They are saving him so he can unleash his newly-developed doosra on you in Brisbane

nadeem · Nov 12, 2006

JUst read in sports section of Times that Tait hit a top speed of 95 mph which is 152.9 kph

Prime Minister's XI v England - Canberra

First Class Captain

ODI Debutant

First Class Captain

Senior ODI Player

T20I Debutant

T20I Debutant

T20I Debutant

PakPassion's 100,000 posts man

Senior T20I Player

T20I Debutant

T20I Debutant

World Star

Senior T20I Player

Senior Test Player

Tape Ball Regular

Senior Test Player

Senior Test Player

Local Club Star

Test Debutant

Senior Test Player

ODI Debutant

Senior ODI Player

ODI Debutant

First Class Player

Senior Test Player

Senior Test Player

Local Club Star

Senior Test Player

World Star

World Star

T20I Debutant

Similar threads